Question Description
Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.Q. Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?a)Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.b)From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.c)Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.d)The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.e)It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.