Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in...

Join the Discussion on the App

Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?

a)
The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.
b)
The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.
c)
Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.
d)
Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.
e)
The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

NMAT Mock Test - 5 (New Pattern)

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent l...

From option 1, even if the cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost, the final price might be lesser than that of from state B. hence, option 1 is not correct answer.

Option 2 is contrary to the fact given in the statement

If entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B, then final price of cars from state B will more than that of from state A. hence, option 4 is not correct answer.

Option 5 does not necessarily mean that cars from state B will be cheaper than cars from state A

If only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A, then cars from state B might be cheaper than cars from state A.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Attention CAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 percent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C. Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage carefully and select the best answer out of the given four alternatives.What if globally designed products could radically change how we work, produce and consume? Several examples across continents show the way we are producing and consuming goods could be improved by relying on globally shared digital resources, such as design, knowledge and software. Imagine a prosthetic hand designed by geographically dispersed communities of scientists, designers and enthusiasts in a collaborative manner via the web. All knowledge and software related to the hand is shared globally as a digital commons. People from all over the world who are connected online and have access to local manufacturing machines can, ideally with the help of an expert, manufacture different commodities. There are no patent costs to pay for. Less transportation of materials is needed, since a considerable part of the manufacturing takes place locally; maintenance is easier, products are designed to last as long as possible, and costs are thus much lower.Take another example. Small-scale farmers need agricultural machines to support their work. Big companies rarely produce machines specifically for small-scale farmers. And if they do, the maintenance costs are high and the farmers have to adjust their farming techniques to the logic of the machines. Technology, after all, is not neutral. So the farmers decide to design the agricultural machines themselves. They produce machines to accommodate their needs and not to sell them for a price on the market. They share their designs with the world – as a global digital commons.Experts are now exploring the contours of an emerging mode of production that builds on the confluence of the digital commons of knowledge, software, and design with local manufacturing technologies. They call this model "design global, manufacture local" and argue that it could lead to sustainable and inclusive forms of production and consumption. It follows the logic that what is light (knowledge, design) becomes global while what is heavy (manufacturing) is local, and ideally shared. When knowledge is shared, materials tend to travel less and people collaborate driven by diverse motives. The profit motive is not totally absent, but it is peripheral. Decentralised open resources for designs can be used for a wide variety of things, medicines, furniture, prosthetic devices, farm tools, machinery and so on.There is now a new idea called cosmolocalism that comes partly from discourse on cosmopolitanism which asserts that each of us has equal moral standing, even as nations treat people differently. The dominant economic system treats physical resources as if they were infinite and then locks up intellectual resources as if they were finite. But the reality is quite the contrary. We live in a world where physical resources are limited, while non-material resources are digitally reproducible and therefore can be shared at a very low cost.However, there are some limitations too. A limitation of this new model is its two main pillars, such as information and communication as well as local manufacturing technologies. These issues may pertain to resource extraction, exploitative labour, energy use or material flows. A thorough evaluation of such products and practices would need to take place.Q. What is the most likely reason for the profit motive being only peripheral under the methodology of design global and manufacture local?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage carefully and select the best answer out of the given four alternatives.What if globally designed products could radically change how we work, produce and consume? Several examples across continents show the way we are producing and consuming goods could be improved by relying on globally shared digital resources, such as design, knowledge and software. Imagine a prosthetic hand designed by geographically dispersed communities of scientists, designers and enthusiasts in a collaborative manner via the web. All knowledge and software related to the hand is shared globally as a digital commons. People from all over the world who are connected online and have access to local manufacturing machines can, ideally with the help of an expert, manufacture different commodities. There are no patent costs to pay for. Less transportation of materials is needed, since a considerable part of the manufacturing takes place locally; maintenance is easier, products are designed to last as long as possible, and costs are thus much lower.Take another example. Small-scale farmers need agricultural machines to support their work. Big companies rarely produce machines specifically for small-scale farmers. And if they do, the maintenance costs are high and the farmers have to adjust their farming techniques to the logic of the machines. Technology, after all, is not neutral. So the farmers decide to design the agricultural machines themselves. They produce machines to accommodate their needs and not to sell them for a price on the market. They share their designs with the world – as a global digital commons.Experts are now exploring the contours of an emerging mode of production that builds on the confluence of the digital commons of knowledge, software, and design with local manufacturing technologies. They call this model "design global, manufacture local" and argue that it could lead to sustainable and inclusive forms of production and consumption. It follows the logic that what is light (knowledge, design) becomes global while what is heavy (manufacturing) is local, and ideally shared. When knowledge is shared, materials tend to travel less and people collaborate driven by diverse motives. The profit motive is not totally absent, but it is peripheral. Decentralised open resources for designs can be used for a wide variety of things, medicines, furniture, prosthetic devices, farm tools, machinery and so on.There is now a new idea called cosmolocalism that comes partly from discourse on cosmopolitanism which asserts that each of us has equal moral standing, even as nations treat people differently. The dominant economic system treats physical resources as if they were infinite and then locks up intellectual resources as if they were finite. But the reality is quite the contrary. We live in a world where physical resources are limited, while non-material resources are digitally reproducible and therefore can be shared at a very low cost.However, there are some limitations too. A limitation of this new model is its two main pillars, such as information and communication as well as local manufacturing technologies. These issues may pertain to resource extraction, exploitative labour, energy use or material flows. A thorough evaluation of such products and practices would need to take place.Q. Each of the following statements is a limitation of the 'design global, manufacture local' approach, except

View answer

Arrange the given sentences into a logical order.A. But there are signs that manufacturers are dragging their feet.B. But incorporating today’s emerging technologies may prove to be the sector’s toughest transition to date.C. These technologies offer opportunities to become more agile, more efficient and to create more value for customers.D. In a survey of manufacturers, it found that two-thirds have only just started—or not yet embarked upon—digital transformation.E. Manufacturing has a long history of transformation driven by wave after wave of technology innovation.Which of the following is the correct order?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage/information and answer the question that follows:The new laws require Agras steel smelting and re-rolling mills to move their operations outside the Agra city limits as they are a major source of air pollutants. The laws require that each manufacturer presents a detailed plan explaining the steps he plans to take in future to reduce pollutants in the city. Clearly, the regulations will not result in significant pollution reduction, however, as the regulations do not force manufacturers to implement their plans.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Statement: The cost of manufacturing cars in state A is 30 per cent less than the cost of manufacturing cars in state B. After transportation fee for the differential distances of states A and B and the interstate taxes, it is cheaper to manufacture cars in state B than in state A for selling these cars in State C.Which of the following supports the conclusion drawn in the above statement?a)The cost of transportation from state A to state C is more than 30 per cent of the production cost.b)The production cost of cars in state B is lower in comparison to state A.c)Only entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state A.d)Entry tax at state C is more for the products originating in state B.e)The total transportation cost of cars from state B to state C and entry tax of cars at state C is less than 30 per cent of the production cost of cars in state B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam