All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Directions: The question given below is foll... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.
Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.
II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.
  • a)
    Either I or II is strong.
  • b)
    Only argument I is strong
  • c)
    Only argument II is strong.
  • d)
    Neither I nor II is strong.
  • e)
    Both I and II are strong
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments num...
The correct option is B, only argument I is strong. In argument I, the reasoning is strong as the money saved on the expenditure of ministries can actually be used for the welfare of citizens. On the other hand, argument II cannot be deemed strong as it doesn't provide any concrete logic as to why the leader of council of minister should get to decide how many minister are to be kept or the pros of having multiple ministers in a cabinet.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments num...
Introduction:
The question asks whether there should be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India. Two arguments are given to support the respective viewpoints. We need to determine which argument is stronger.

Argument I: There should be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India.
Explanation:
- The argument states that having a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet will result in saving a lot of money.
- This saved money can then be utilized in developmental programs.
- By limiting the number of ministers, the government can reduce the expenses related to their salaries, allowances, and perks.
- This will free up a significant amount of funds that can be directed towards various developmental initiatives such as infrastructure development, education, healthcare, etc.

Argument II: There should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives.
Explanation:
- The argument suggests that there should not be any restrictions on democratically elected representatives.
- It emphasizes that the judgment of the leader of the council of ministers should be relied upon when deciding the number of ministers in a cabinet.
- This argument supports the notion that the leader should have the freedom to choose the number of ministers based on the needs and requirements of the government.
- Imposing restrictions may hinder the democratic process and limit the decision-making power of the elected representatives.

Analysis:
Both arguments present valid points, but argument I is stronger for the following reasons:

1. Financial Efficiency: Argument I highlights the financial benefits of having a restriction on the number of ministers. By limiting the number of ministers, the government can save a significant amount of money that can be redirected towards developmental programs. This promotes financial efficiency and ensures the optimal utilization of resources.

2. Accountability and Transparency: Setting a limit on the number of ministers ensures that the government remains accountable and transparent. With a smaller cabinet, it becomes easier to track the performance and responsibilities of individual ministers. This allows for better governance and reduces the chances of corruption and inefficiency.

3. Focus on Development: By saving money through a restricted number of ministers, the government can allocate more funds towards developmental programs. This can lead to improved infrastructure, better education, healthcare facilities, and overall development of the country.

On the other hand, argument II emphasizes the importance of democratic representation and the freedom of the leader to make decisions. While these points hold some merit, they do not outweigh the advantages presented by argument I.

Conclusion:
Considering the financial benefits, accountability, transparency, and focus on development, argument I is stronger. Imposing restrictions on the number of ministers in each cabinet can result in substantial savings and promote effective governance. However, it is essential to strike a balance between limiting the number of ministers and ensuring adequate representation in a democratic system.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Answer the following question based on the information given below.Eight representatives - A to H - one from each of the eight international test playing nations are invited by the ICC for an event where strategies to encourage different countries to take up cricket are to be discussed. All eight nations have a different ICC test ranking from 1 to 8 and every representative has scored a different number of centuries in international cricket. These representatives are staying in a hotel on the same floor but in eight different rooms. There are only eight rooms on the floor. There are four rooms in each row. There is a corridor such that one row is to the left of the corridor and the other is to its right. The Indian and Pakistani representatives stay in room numbers 401 and 408, not necessarily in the same order. Rooms adjacent to each other are numbered consecutively, such that rooms 403 and 406 are opposite each other.The addition of the test rank of India and Australia is the same as the rank of Sri Lanka. Also, the addition of Indias and New Zealands rank is equal to West Indies rank. The addition of ranks of Pakistan and New Zealand is the same as that of West Indies and Sri Lanka.B is from West Indies. C is not from Pakistan, Sri Lanka or England. G is from New Zealand. D is neither from England nor from Sri Lanka.The ranks of India, New Zealand, West Indies, and England are prime numbers. A, the representative from India, has scored 100 centuries. This is the maximum number of centuries scored by any representative.Australias rank as well as the number of centuries scored by the Australian representative is a perfect square. Sri Lankas rank is twice Englands rank. The number of centuries scored by the Australian is a perfect cube.The Australian is opposite room number 404 and there is only one room adjacent to his room. The South African stays in room number 407 and neither the Indian nor the Australian is his neighbor. The West Indian and the New Zealander stay opposite each other.The number of centuries scored by the Pakistani, Englishman, South African, Sri Lankan, and Australian are consecutive numbers in decreasing order. With 32 centuries, the New Zealander has scored the least number of centuries.H represents South Africa, which holds the top most spot in the test rankings. F is not from Sri LankaQ.If the West Indian representative stays in room number 403, in which room does the representative from New Zealand stay?

Answer the following question based on the information given below.Eight representatives - A to H - one from each of the eight international test playing nations are invited by the ICC for an event where strategies to encourage different countries to take up cricket are to be discussed. All eight nations have a different ICC test ranking from 1 to 8 and every representative has scored a different number of centuries in international cricket. These representatives are staying in a hotel on the same floor but in eight different rooms. There are only eight rooms on the floor. There are four rooms in each row. There is a corridor such that one row is to the left of the corridor and the other is to its right. The Indian and Pakistani representatives stay in room numbers 401 and 408, not necessarily in the same order. Rooms adjacent to each other are numbered consecutively, such that rooms 403 and 406 are opposite each other.The addition of the test rank of India and Australia is the same as the rank of Sri Lanka. Also, the addition of Indias and New Zealands rank is equal to West Indies rank. The addition of ranks of Pakistan and New Zealand is the same as that of West Indies and Sri Lanka.B is from West Indies. C is not from Pakistan, Sri Lanka or England. G is from New Zealand. D is neither from England nor from Sri Lanka.The ranks of India, New Zealand, West Indies, and England are prime numbers. A, the representative from India, has scored 100 centuries. This is the maximum number of centuries scored by any representative.Australias rank as well as the number of centuries scored by the Australian representative is a perfect square. Sri Lankas rank is twice Englands rank. The number of centuries scored by the Australian is a perfect cube.The Australian is opposite room number 404 and there is only one room adjacent to his room. The South African stays in room number 407 and neither the Indian nor the Australian is his neighbor. The West Indian and the New Zealander stay opposite each other.The number of centuries scored by the Pakistani, Englishman, South African, Sri Lankan, and Australian are consecutive numbers in decreasing order. With 32 centuries, the New Zealander has scored the least number of centuries.H represents South Africa, which holds the top most spot in the test rankings. F is not from Sri LankaQ.Which of these can be the total number of centuries scored by all eight representatives?

Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.

Group QuestionAnswer the following question based on the information given below.For a certain quiz, 10 questions have been short listed but the number of participating teams is yet undecided. The question numbers are labeled as Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9 and Q10.Since the number of participating teams is not decided, it was decided to form sets from these 10 questions with the restriction that each set must have at least two questions.However the selection of questions for any set was subject to following restrictions:1. Q1 and Q8 must be in the same set.2. Q8 and Q5 cannot be in the same set.3. Q2 and Q6 cannot be in the same set.4. Q9, Q2 and 0 4 if selected must be in the same set.5. Q3 and Q10 must appear in the set together.6. Q1 and Q3 cannot be in the same set.Additional information for Q.1 and Q.2:All the sets formed have 4 questions each.Q.How many sets of four questions can be formed? Correct answer is '6'. Can you explain this answer?

For a certain quiz, 10 questions have been short listed but the number of participating teams is yet undecided. The question numbers are labeled as Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9 and Q10.Since the number of participating teams is not decided, it was decided to form sets from these 10 questions with the restriction that each set must have at least two questions.However the selection of questions for any set was subject to following restrictions:1. Q1 and Q8 must be in the same set.2. Q8 and Q5 cannot be in the same set.3. Q2 and Q6 cannot be in the same set.4. Q9, Q2 and 0 4 if selected must be in the same set.5. Q3 and Q10 must appear in the set together.6. Q1 and Q3 cannot be in the same set.Additional information for Q.1 and Q.2:All the sets formed have 4 questions each.Q.How many questions cannot be the part of such sets? Correct answer is '0'. Can you explain this answer?

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup