CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Directions: The question given below is foll...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.
Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.
II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.
- a)Either I or II is strong.
- b)Only argument I is strong
- c)Only argument II is strong.
- d)Neither I nor II is strong.
- e)Both I and II are strong
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments num...
The correct option is B, only argument I is strong. In argument I, the reasoning is strong as the money saved on the expenditure of ministries can actually be used for the welfare of citizens. On the other hand, argument II cannot be deemed strong as it doesn't provide any concrete logic as to why the leader of council of minister should get to decide how many minister are to be kept or the pros of having multiple ministers in a cabinet.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments num...
Introduction:
The question asks whether there should be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India. Two arguments are given to support the respective viewpoints. We need to determine which argument is stronger.
Argument I: There should be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India.
Explanation:
- The argument states that having a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet will result in saving a lot of money.
- This saved money can then be utilized in developmental programs.
- By limiting the number of ministers, the government can reduce the expenses related to their salaries, allowances, and perks.
- This will free up a significant amount of funds that can be directed towards various developmental initiatives such as infrastructure development, education, healthcare, etc.
Argument II: There should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives.
Explanation:
- The argument suggests that there should not be any restrictions on democratically elected representatives.
- It emphasizes that the judgment of the leader of the council of ministers should be relied upon when deciding the number of ministers in a cabinet.
- This argument supports the notion that the leader should have the freedom to choose the number of ministers based on the needs and requirements of the government.
- Imposing restrictions may hinder the democratic process and limit the decision-making power of the elected representatives.
Analysis:
Both arguments present valid points, but argument I is stronger for the following reasons:
1. Financial Efficiency: Argument I highlights the financial benefits of having a restriction on the number of ministers. By limiting the number of ministers, the government can save a significant amount of money that can be redirected towards developmental programs. This promotes financial efficiency and ensures the optimal utilization of resources.
2. Accountability and Transparency: Setting a limit on the number of ministers ensures that the government remains accountable and transparent. With a smaller cabinet, it becomes easier to track the performance and responsibilities of individual ministers. This allows for better governance and reduces the chances of corruption and inefficiency.
3. Focus on Development: By saving money through a restricted number of ministers, the government can allocate more funds towards developmental programs. This can lead to improved infrastructure, better education, healthcare facilities, and overall development of the country.
On the other hand, argument II emphasizes the importance of democratic representation and the freedom of the leader to make decisions. While these points hold some merit, they do not outweigh the advantages presented by argument I.
Conclusion:
Considering the financial benefits, accountability, transparency, and focus on development, argument I is stronger. Imposing restrictions on the number of ministers in each cabinet can result in substantial savings and promote effective governance. However, it is essential to strike a balance between limiting the number of ministers and ensuring adequate representation in a democratic system.
The question asks whether there should be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India. Two arguments are given to support the respective viewpoints. We need to determine which argument is stronger.
Argument I: There should be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India.
Explanation:
- The argument states that having a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet will result in saving a lot of money.
- This saved money can then be utilized in developmental programs.
- By limiting the number of ministers, the government can reduce the expenses related to their salaries, allowances, and perks.
- This will free up a significant amount of funds that can be directed towards various developmental initiatives such as infrastructure development, education, healthcare, etc.
Argument II: There should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives.
Explanation:
- The argument suggests that there should not be any restrictions on democratically elected representatives.
- It emphasizes that the judgment of the leader of the council of ministers should be relied upon when deciding the number of ministers in a cabinet.
- This argument supports the notion that the leader should have the freedom to choose the number of ministers based on the needs and requirements of the government.
- Imposing restrictions may hinder the democratic process and limit the decision-making power of the elected representatives.
Analysis:
Both arguments present valid points, but argument I is stronger for the following reasons:
1. Financial Efficiency: Argument I highlights the financial benefits of having a restriction on the number of ministers. By limiting the number of ministers, the government can save a significant amount of money that can be redirected towards developmental programs. This promotes financial efficiency and ensures the optimal utilization of resources.
2. Accountability and Transparency: Setting a limit on the number of ministers ensures that the government remains accountable and transparent. With a smaller cabinet, it becomes easier to track the performance and responsibilities of individual ministers. This allows for better governance and reduces the chances of corruption and inefficiency.
3. Focus on Development: By saving money through a restricted number of ministers, the government can allocate more funds towards developmental programs. This can lead to improved infrastructure, better education, healthcare facilities, and overall development of the country.
On the other hand, argument II emphasizes the importance of democratic representation and the freedom of the leader to make decisions. While these points hold some merit, they do not outweigh the advantages presented by argument I.
Conclusion:
Considering the financial benefits, accountability, transparency, and focus on development, argument I is stronger. Imposing restrictions on the number of ministers in each cabinet can result in substantial savings and promote effective governance. However, it is essential to strike a balance between limiting the number of ministers and ensuring adequate representation in a democratic system.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
|
Explore Courses for CAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CATView all
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are 'strong'.Q. Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India?Arguments:I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes.II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.a)Either I or II is strong.b)Only argument I is strongc)Only argument II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.e)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup