For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > For the underlined part of the given sentenc...

For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.

Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.

a)
Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,
b)
The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,
c)
Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,
d)
Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that...

Option A: Each does not agree with the plural verb were.

Option B: 'Each of them Camus's novels' is illogical.

Option C: This is the correct answer. In this sentence, the plural subject "novels" matches the plural verb "were".

Option D: Everyone is singular and does not agree with "novels" or "were".

Hence, the correct option is (c).

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Although Mahatama Gandhi advocated non-violence during his lifetime, yet his death is considered ironical.

View answer

Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Every age has its pet contradictions, A few decades back, we used lo accept Marx and Freud together, and then wonder, like the chameleon an the turkey carpet, why life was so confusing. Today there is similar trouble over the question whether there is, or is not, something called Human Nature, On the one hand, there has been an explosion of animal behavior studies, and comparisons between animals and men have become immensely popular. People use evidence from animal? (o decide whether man is naturally aggressive, or naturally territorial; even whether he has an aggressive or territorial instinct. Moreover, we are still much influenced by Freudian psychology, which depends on the notion of instinct On the other hand, many still hold what may be called the Blank Paper view, that man is a creature entirely without instincts. So do Existentialist philosophers. If man has no instincts, all comparison with animals must be irrelevant. (Both these simple party lines have been somewhat eroded over time, but both are still extremely influential.) According to the Blank Paper view, man is entirely the product of his culture. He starts off infinitely plastic, and is formed completely by the society in which he grows up. There is then no end to the possible variations among cultures; what we take to be human instincts are just the deep-dug prejudices of our own society. Forming families, -fearing the dark, and jumping at die sight of a spider are just results of out conditioning. Existentialism at first appears a very different standpoint, because the Existentialist asserts mans freedom and wilt not let him call himself a product of anything. But Existentialism too denies that man has a nature; if he had, his freedom would not be complete. Thus Sartre insisted that "there is no human nature.... Man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world, and defines himself afterwards. If man as the Existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he mates himself" For Existentialism there is only the human condition, which is what happens to man and not what he is born like. If we are afraid of the dark, it is because we choose to be cowards: if we care more for our own children than for o(her peoples, it is because we choose to be partial. We must never talk about human nature or human instincts. This implicit moral notion is still very influential, not at all confined to those who use the metaphysic of essence and existence. So I shall sometimes speak of it, not as Existentialist, but at libertarian—meaning that those holding it do not just (like alt of us) think liberty important, but think it supremely important and believe that our having a nature would infringe it.Philosophers have not yet made much use of informed comparison with other species as a help in the understanding of man.One reason they have not is undoubtedly the fear of fatalism. Another is the appalling way terms such as instinct and human nature have been misused in the past. A third is the absurdity of some ethological propaganda.A business school led by an existentialist director, warned to decide on admission policy for its executive MBA program, which requires candidates to possess minimum five years of managerial experience.With respect to the selection process, which of the following statements will be closest to the directors belief

View answer

Analyse the passage below and answer the question that follow:Every age has its pet contradictions. A few decades back, we used to accept Marx and Freud together, and then wonder, like the chameleon on the turkey carpet, why life was so confusing. Today there is similar trouble over the question whether there is, or is not, something called Human Nature. On the one hand, there has been an explosion of animal behavior studies, and comparisons between animals and men have become immensely popular. People use evidence from animals to decide whether man is naturally aggressive, or naturally territorial; even whether he has an aggressive or territorial instinct.Moreover, we are still much influenced by Freudian psychology, which depends on the notion of instinct. On the other hand, many still hold what may be called the Blank Paper view, that man is a creature entirely without instincts. So do Existentialist philosophers. If man has no instincts, all comparison with animals must be irrelevant. (Both these simple party lines have been somewhat eroded over time, but both are still extremely influential.) According to the Blank Paper view, man is entirely the product of his culture. He starts off infinitely plastic, and is formed completely by the society in which he grows up. There is then no end to the possible variations amongcultures; what we take to be human instincts are just the deep-dug prejudices of our own society. Forming families, fearing the dark, and jumping at the sight of a spider are just results of our conditioning. Existentialism at first appears from a very different standpoint, because the Existentialist asserts man's freedom and will not let him call himself a product of anything. But Existentialism too denies that man has a nature; if he had, his freedom would not be complete. Thus Sartre insisted that "there is no human nature.... Man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world, and defines himself afterwards. If man as the Existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he makes himself."For Existentialism there is only the human condition, which is what happens to man and not what he is born like. If we are afraid of the dark, it is because we choose to be cowards; if we care more for our own children than for other people's, it is because we choose to be partial. We must never talk about human nature or human instincts.This implicit moral notion is still very influential, not at all confined to those who use the metaphysic of essence and existence. So I shall sometimes speak of it, not as Existentialist, but as Libertarian––meaning that those holding it do not just (like all of us) think liberty important, but think it supremely important and believe that our having a nature would infringe it.Philosophers have not yet made much use of informed comparison with other species as a help in the understanding of man. One reason they have not is undoubtedly the fear of fatalism. Another is the appalling way terms such as instinct and human nature have been misused in the past. A third is the absurdity of some ethological propaganda.Q. A business school led by an existentialist director, wanted to decide on admission policy for its executive MBA program, which requires candidates to possess at least five years of managerial experience.With respect to the selection process, which of the following statements will be closest to the director's belief

View answer

Analyse the passage below and answer the question that follow:Every age has its pet contradictions. A few decades back, we used to accept Marx and Freud together, and then wonder, like the chameleon on the turkey carpet, why life was so confusing. Today there is similar trouble over the question whether there is, or is not, something called Human Nature. On the one hand, there has been an explosion of animal behavior studies, and comparisons between animals and men have become immensely popular. People use evidence from animals to decide whether man is naturally aggressive, or naturally territorial; even whether he has an aggressive or territorial instinct.Moreover, we are still much influenced by Freudian psychology, which depends on the notion of instinct. On the other hand, many still hold what may be called the Blank Paper view, that man is a creature entirely without instincts. So do Existentialist philosophers. If man has no instincts, all comparison with animals must be irrelevant. (Both these simple party lines have been somewhat eroded over time, but both are still extremely influential.) According to the Blank Paper view, man is entirely the product of his culture. He starts off infinitely plastic, and is formed completely by the society in which he grows up. There is then no end to the possible variations amongcultures; what we take to be human instincts are just the deep-dug prejudices of our own society. Forming families, fearing the dark, and jumping at the sight of a spider are just results of our conditioning. Existentialism at first appears from a very different standpoint, because the Existentialist asserts man's freedom and will not let him call himself a product of anything. But Existentialism too denies that man has a nature; if he had, his freedom would not be complete. Thus Sartre insisted that "there is no human nature.... Man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world, and defines himself afterwards. If man as the Existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he makes himself."For Existentialism there is only the human condition, which is what happens to man and not what he is born like. If we are afraid of the dark, it is because we choose to be cowards; if we care more for our own children than for other people's, it is because we choose to be partial. We must never talk about human nature or human instincts.This implicit moral notion is still very influential, not at all confined to those who use the metaphysic of essence and existence. So I shall sometimes speak of it, not as Existentialist, but as Libertarian––meaning that those holding it do not just (like all of us) think liberty important, but think it supremely important and believe that our having a nature would infringe it.Philosophers have not yet made much use of informed comparison with other species as a help in the understanding of man. One reason they have not is undoubtedly the fear of fatalism. Another is the appalling way terms such as instinct and human nature have been misused in the past. A third is the absurdity of some ethological propaganda.Q. Which sentence in the passage distances man from "nature", the most?

View answer

Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Every age has its pet contradictions, A few decades back, we used lo accept Marx and Freud together, and then wonder, like the chameleon an the turkey carpet, why life was so confusing. Today there is similar trouble over the question whether there is, or is not, something called Human Nature, On the one hand, there has been an explosion of animal behavior studies, and comparisons between animals and men have become immensely popular. People use evidence from animal? (o decide whether man is naturally aggressive, or naturally territorial; even whether he has an aggressive or territorial instinct. Moreover, we are still much influenced by Freudian psychology, which depends on the notion of instinct On the other hand, many still hold what may be called the Blank Paper view, that man is a creature entirely without instincts. So do Existentialist philosophers. If man has no instincts, all comparison with animals must be irrelevant. (Both these simple party lines have been somewhat eroded over time, but both are still extremely influential.) According to the Blank Paper view, man is entirely the product of his culture. He starts off infinitely plastic, and is formed completely by the society in which he grows up. There is then no end to the possible variations among cultures; what we take to be human instincts are just the deep-dug prejudices of our own society. Forming families, -fearing the dark, and jumping at die sight of a spider are just results of out conditioning. Existentialism at first appears a very different standpoint, because the Existentialist asserts mans freedom and wilt not let him call himself a product of anything. But Existentialism too denies that man has a nature; if he had, his freedom would not be complete. Thus Sartre insisted that "there is no human nature.... Man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world, and defines himself afterwards. If man as the Existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he mates himself" For Existentialism there is only the human condition, which is what happens to man and not what he is born like. If we are afraid of the dark, it is because we choose to be cowards: if we care more for our own children than for o(her peoples, it is because we choose to be partial. We must never talk about human nature or human instincts. This implicit moral notion is still very influential, not at all confined to those who use the metaphysic of essence and existence. So I shall sometimes speak of it, not as Existentialist, but at libertarian—meaning that those holding it do not just (like alt of us) think liberty important, but think it supremely important and believe that our having a nature would infringe it.Philosophers have not yet made much use of informed comparison with other species as a help in the understanding of man.One reason they have not is undoubtedly the fear of fatalism. Another is the appalling way terms such as instinct and human nature have been misused in the past. A third is the absurdity of some ethological propaganda.Q. Which of the following statements would the author agree with the most?

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Verbal Ability (VA) & Reading Comprehension (RC)

Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI)

Top Courses for CAT

View all

For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice For the underlined part of the given sentence, choose the option that is grammatically correct, effective and reduces ambiguity and redundancy.Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels, very different from the florid and verbose literature of his times.a)Each of Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,b)The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- each of them Camus's novels-were existentialist and invigorating novels,c)Camus's novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- were existentialist and invigorating novels,d)Existentialist and invigorating novels-The Outsider, The Rebel and The Plague- everyone of Camus's novels were,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam