Question Description
This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice This GMAT practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept reviewed: Weaken the reasoning presented by the author and present an alternative explanation for the outcome given in the argument. A text-book cause effect relationship CR question.Terrorist attacks invariably lead to tremendous losses in life, property, and morale of a country. The effects of a terrorist attack are not just immediate and can have long-lasting, trickle-down effects as well. The fear, for example, takes a long time to die down. However, some of these repercussions can be beneficial to the country. Take for instance, the recent terrorist attack on our capital city. In the weeks following the attack, the crime rate in the city came down significantly from what it was just before the attack. This must primarily be due to the increased presence of police resources that were moved to the area and is thus an indirect effect of the attack.Q.Which of the following options gives one more option as to why the crime rate decreased because of the terrorist attacks?a)The capital city is under increased monitoring leading to quick detection of crimes - many times while the crime is still underway.b)A number of people are frightened because of the terrorist attacks and have fled the capital city.c)There was a recorded decrease in crime rate right after the terrorist attack in almost all cities of the country.d)Intel reports show that the terrorists who pulled off the attack had been committing various other smaller crimes regularly to distract law enforcement from their true purposes.e)The government had initiated schemes to decrease poverty and provide better livelihood for the people just before the terrorist attack.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.