All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Directions: Choose the word or set of words ... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.
The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.
  • a)
    manifested
  • b)
    pampered
  • c)
    serenaded
  • d)
    fancied
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in th...
The leader of opposition is comparing the state of Prime Minister's constituency with that of other constituencies in adverse context (detriment). The keyword is 'unduly'. The prediction for the blank would be 'favoured'. The closest fit is 'pampered'.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in th...
Unduly pampered

The sentence talks about the leader of the opposition criticizing the Prime Minister's constituency in Parliament. The criticism is that the Prime Minister's constituency is being given preferential treatment in a way that is unfair to all the adjacent constituencies.

To understand the correct answer choice, let's look at the options provided:

a) manifested: This word means "to show or demonstrate." However, it does not fit the context of the sentence. The leader of the opposition is not saying that the Prime Minister's constituency is being shown or demonstrated, but rather that it is being treated unfairly.

b) pampered: This word means "to indulge or give preferential treatment." It fits the context of the sentence perfectly. The leader of the opposition is accusing the Prime Minister's constituency of receiving undue and excessive favoritism to the detriment of other constituencies.

c) serenaded: This word means "to entertain with music." It does not make sense in the context of the sentence. The leader of the opposition is not talking about the Prime Minister's constituency being entertained, but rather about it receiving unfair treatment.

d) fancied: This word means "to imagine or desire." It does not fit the context of the sentence. The leader of the opposition is not talking about imagining or desiring the Prime Minister's constituency, but rather about it being treated unfairly.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - pampered. This word accurately conveys the meaning that the Prime Minister's constituency is being given excessive and unfair preferential treatment at the expense of other constituencies.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: Roshan Seth and his son, Kabir Seth, are the members of the BVLP, the party in power in Haryana. Roshan Seth is a senior member of the party and is also a minister in the state government. His son recently was involved in shoot-out in a pub in Gurugram, wherein a leading model, Jessica Shah, was shot dead. Kabir Seth and his two friends are the prime accused in the case. All three individuals are in police custody. Roshan Seth claims that his son is innocent and is being framed by his opponents within and outside the party. The opposition party, on the other hand, is clamouring for the resignation of the minister as they claim he is hindering the investigation.The disciplinary committee of the party needs to decide what to do in the given case. Roshan Seth is a senior member of the party who has a very strong hold over his constituency. The party conducted an on-ground survey in the last one week is his constituency and support for him remains strong, despite the controversy. Along with this, he is an influential member of the fund-raising committee for the party and has strong links with the major financers of the party. Any strong action against him can be seen as harsh in nature. On the other hand, the public reaction to the controversy has been very severe and the public sees this incident as one in a series of similar incidents, where those in power have taken law into their own hands. The elections in the state are scheduled for next year.Which, out of the following, represents the most unethical act if committed by Roshan Seth?

Directions: Roshan Seth and his son, Kabir Seth, are the members of the BVLP, the party in power in Haryana. Roshan Seth is a senior member of the party and is also a minister in the state government. His son recently was involved in shoot-out in a pub in Gurugram, wherein a leading model, Jessica Shah, was shot dead. Kabir Seth and his two friends are the prime accused in the case. All three individuals are in police custody. Roshan Seth claims that his son is innocent and is being framed by his opponents within and outside the party. The opposition party, on the other hand, is clamouring for the resignation of the minister as they claim he is hindering the investigation.The disciplinary committee of the party needs to decide what to do in the given case. Roshan Seth is a senior member of the party who has a very strong hold over his constituency. The party conducted an on-ground survey in the last one week is his constituency and support for him remains strong, despite the controversy. Along with this, he is an influential member of the fund-raising committee for the party and has strong links with the major financers of the party. Any strong action against him can be seen as harsh in nature. On the other hand, the public reaction to the controversy has been very severe and the public sees this incident as one in a series of similar incidents, where those in power have taken law into their own hands. The elections in the state are scheduled for next year.Considering the public opinion, the party has decided to remove both Roshan Seth and Kabir Seth from the party. Roshan Seth does not view this as the right outcome in the given case and feels that the party has been unfair with him. What is it that should be done by Roshan Seth considering the election year is just around the corner?

In an election several candidates contested for a constituency. In any constituency, the winning candidate was the one who polled the highest number of votes, the first runner up was the one who polled the second highest number of votes, the second runner up was the one who polled the third highest number of votes, and so on. There were no ties (in terms of number of votes polled by the candidates) in any of the constituencies in this election.In an electoral system, a security deposit is the sum of money that a candidate is required to pay to the election commission before he or she is permitted to contest. Only the defeated candidates (i.e., one who is not the winning candidat e) who fail to secure more than one sixth of the valid votes polled in the constituency, lose their security deposits.The following table provides some incomplete information about votes polled in four constituencies: A, B, C and D, in this election.The following additional facts are known:1. The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.2. None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.3. The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.For all the four constituencies taken together, what was the approximate number of votes polled by all the candidates who lost their security deposit expressed as a percentage of the total valid votes from these four constituencies?

In an election several candidates contested for a constituency. In any constituency, the winning candidate was the one who polled the highest number of votes, the first runner up was the one who polled the second highest number of votes, the second runner up was the one who polled the third highest number of votes, and so on. There were no ties (in terms of number of votes polled by the candidates) in any of the constituencies in this election.In an electoral system, a security deposit is the sum of money that a candidate is required to pay to the election commission before he or she is permitted to contest. Only the defeated candidates (i.e., one who is not the winning candidat e) who fail to secure more than one sixth of the valid votes polled in the constituency, lose their security deposits.The following table provides some incomplete information about votes polled in four constituencies: A, B, C and D, in this election.The following additional facts are known:1. The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.2. None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.3. The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.The winning margin of a constituency is defined as the difference of votes polled by the winner and that of the first runner up. Which of the following CANNOT be the list of constituencies, in increasing order of winning margin?

Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the questions with the most appropriate choice.Elected officials may have more power to shape public opinion than they realize. Two political scientists, David Broockman of the University of California, Berkeley, and Daniel Butler of Washington University in St. Louis, tested this in a series of experiments in how citizens reacted to issue-oriented letters from lawmakers.The two academics secured the agreement of eight Democratic state legislators from an unidentified Midwestern state to conduct two experiments using official letters sent from the lawmakers to their constituents and verifying the recipients' opinions before and after the letters using surveys. The results show that in both cases lawmakers who took positions opposed by their constituents, even on contested political topics, suffered no penalty for doing so, and even helped build support for those policies as constituents adopted them.This suggests that, at least at the state legislative level, elected officials holding back from communicating their stances on controversial issues might be better off making their views known. "We don't know the full effects, but this points to the ability to help build support for policies they care about," Mr. Butler said of lawmakers in an interview.In the first experiment, a single state legislator sent some constituents a letter taking a stance on an issue that the recipient had not agreed with during the initial survey, while other constituents got no letter. The issue was one of four covering regulation of mining in the lawmaker's district, government funding of school vouchers, a reduction in state income tax and permitting school districts to raise property taxes.More than half the constituents who got a letter recalled receiving mail from their representative in the follow-up survey, but there was no backlash against the lawmaker for taking an opposing stance, the researchers found. Just the act of receiving a personal letter from an elected official might have affected how a constituent viewed the sender, so the researchers designed a second experiment.They expanded the pool to seven state legislators. Again, letters expressing a policy position were sent to some constituents who disagreed with that stance, while others got a standard letter that did not express any policy positions. The researchers added an additional factor: Some of the policy letters included extensive justifications for taking the stance, while others had only a brief explanation. The letters, which did not mention the partisan affiliation of the sender, also covered a broader range of subjects, from the minimum wage to marijuana legalization to government-sponsored pensions.Again, the researchers found that constituents did not think less of their representatives when they voiced opposite view; in some cases, a constituent's opinion of the lawmaker improved and he or she embraced the policy. The length of lawmakers' arguments had very little effect. "Legislators appeared able to move constituents' opinions by stating their own positions with minimal justification; adding additional arguments did not make them more persuasive," the researchers said.According to the information provided in the passage, the second experiment

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Choose the word or set of words that, when inserted in the sentence, best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole.The leader of the opposition said in Parliament that the Prime Minister's constituency was being unduly ________ to the detriment of all adjacent constituencies.a)manifestedb)pamperedc)serenadedd)fanciedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup