Question Description
Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer? for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) 2024 is part of Computer Science Engineering (CSE) preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Computer Science Engineering (CSE) exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Computer Science Engineering (CSE). Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following proposed solution to the dining Philosophers problem to avoid deadlock. Consider the binary semaphore lock is initialized to 1:Philosopher (int i){while (1){think ();wait (lock); ...(i)wait (fork [i]);wait (fork [(+1) % 5];signal (lock); ...(ii)eat ();wait (lock); ...(iii)signal (fork [i]);signal (fork (i+1) % 5);signal (lock); .....(iv)Which of the following is correct?a)Removing (i) and (ii) will affect the code. The code will not work fine.b)Removing (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code still work fine.c)Removing both 9, (ii), (iii) and (iv) will not affect the code. The code will still work fine.d)All (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are necessary. Removal of any of them will affect the code.Correct answer is option 'A,B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Computer Science Engineering (CSE) tests.