Question Description
Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: From the below given alternative summaries, choose the one that best presents the essence of the text.The best and the brightest in the IMF and the World Bank were aghast at the sudden collapse in southeast Asia. They thought they had been managing the world economy wonderfully well, following what came to be known as the Washington Consensus. The Washington Consensus was a set of aphorisms shared by the IMF, the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Washington think-tanks and their friends around the world. The Washington Consensus called for an implicit faith in the efficacy of market economy, free movement of international capital and an unrestricted and free trade of goods throughout the world. Unable to place their finger on the precise reason for the collapse, they blamed short-term capital managed by financial intermediaries - commonly referred to as hot money. In a globalised economy, they discovered with feigned wonderment, billions of dollars can be moved at the stroke of a computer key and this fact makes it almost impossible to manage or control its movement. At the same time, they said, imposing any restrictions on the movement of this hot money is just not permissible, since it went against the basic credo of globalisation, namely, the free movement of capital. When Malaysia imposed a few restrictions, there was a howl of protest from all over the West. They said the imposition of such restrictions scared away capital from such countries and would prove counter-productive in the long run.a)Harmful practices like unrestricted flow of goods and services were allowed to continue to satisfy vested interests.b)Southeast Asian crisis presented a significant challenge to the supporters of free market economy.c)Malaysian debacle gave an in-depth idea of what international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank stood for in the global economy.d)IMF and World Bank failed to admit the falsity of their unhindered belief in free-market economy and confusingly advocated for the crises cause.e)Inefficiency of the Washington Consensus allowed IMF and WTO to shift the blame towards extraneous factors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.