All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 1 Exam  >  Class 1 Questions  >  Directions: Three children have different thr... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.
Who is the oldest?
  • a)
    Anshul
  • b)
    Mayank
  • c)
    Shubham
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Class 1 doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were...
Correct order of birth: Mayank - Anshul - Shubham
Explore Courses for Class 1 exam

Similar Class 1 Doubts

Directions: The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.What good is vaccination? Obviously it is good for the person receiving the vaccine, if he is thus prevented from suffering from a nasty disease. More subtly, it can be good for an entire population since, if enough of its members are vaccinated, even those who are not will receive a measure of protection. That is because, with only a few susceptible individuals, the transmission of the infection cannot be maintained and the disease spread is checked. But in the case of many vaccines, there are non-medical benefits, too, in the form of costs avoided and the generation of income that would otherwise have been lost. These goods are economic. Quantifying these more general benefits is hard. But a pair of researchers from Harvard University has just tried. David Bloom and David Canning, together with Mark Weston, an independent policy consultant, have looked at two vaccination programmes and attempted to calculate the wider benefits. Their conclusions have just been published in the World Economics.Dr. Bloom and Dr. Canning believed that previous attempts to quantify the non-medical benefits of vaccination had been too narrow. These had looked at such data as the cost of a programme per life saved, but had failed to take account of recent work on the effects of health on incomes. For their study, they and Mr Weston identified how vaccination, in particular, might increase wealth.The first benefit was that healthy children are more likely to attend school and better able to learn. The second was that healthy workers are more productive. Both of these seem fairly obvious. Two other benefits, however, are less so. One being that good health promotes savings and investments. This is because healthy people both expect to live longer and actually do live longer. The other being that good health—and particularly, expectations about the good health of one’s offspring – promote the so-called demographic transition from large to small families that usually accompanies economic development. None of these factors, the researchers thought, had been properly taken account of in previous estimates of the cost-effectiveness of vaccination.To demonstrate that at least one of their ideas was correct, they turned to the Phillipines. Here, a study called the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey has been going on since 1983. It follows the lives of Filipina mothers and those of their children born in 1983 and 1984. Among the data collected were the records of the vaccinations these children received as infants and also their scores in language, maths and IQ tests at the age of ten. The three researchers organized children whose social circumstances were similar into groups, depending on whether or not the children had been vaccinated against a range of diseases including measles, polio and tuberculosis. They then compared test scores between groups. They found a statistically significant difference in the language and IQ scores between otherwise comparable vaccinated and unvaccinated children. In both cases, those of the unvaccinated were lower. Since it is known for the other studies that these scores are good predictors of adult income, the researchers concluded that childhood vaccination would have significant economic benefits.In order to predict those benefits, they turned to vaccination campaign that is just beginning. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) is a collaboration of governments, international organizations, vaccine-makers and charities. It is embarking on a 15-year programme to vaccinate children in 75 of the world’s poorest countries against a range of childhood diseases. The programme is scheduled to cost 13 bn dollars. First, the researchers used data from previous vaccination programmes to estimate both the reduction in mortality and the improvement in the health of the living that might be expected to flow from the new GAVI programme. Then they combined these estimates with existing data about the economic effects of health improvement in these programmes in poor countries, in particular their effects on future income. Using standard accounting methodsthey calculate that the new GAVI programme can be expected to generate an immediate rate of return of 12.4%, rising to 18% by the end of the programme. And that does not include any benefits that might come from the demographic transition. The dispassionate economic case for vaccination, therefore, looks at least as strong as the compassionate medical one. If the figures produced by Dr Bloom, Dr Canning and Mr Weston are right, it truly is an investment for the future.Q. In the context of the passage, the concept of demographic transition as associated with economic development can be understood as ?

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A golden age for Western schools in China may be coming to an end in the face of a new Government clampdown. China has been a happy hunting ground for Western schools in the recent years, as a burgeoning middle class looks to equip their children with the qualifications to get into a Western university, as well as the skills to join a global workforce.The last five years have seen a 64% increase in the number of students enrolled in international schools in China. But from the next year, schools will have to select their students via a lottery, rather than being able to pick and choose from among the applicants. The crackdown has been prompted by fears that foreign-owned schools are poaching the brightest children. The move follows changes introduced last year requiring international schools to teach the Chinese curriculum alongside other national programs.There is a backlash against the rapid increase in private schools in China, particularly from the big public schools where it’s perceived that they have been simply poaching off the best kids. The Chinese government was also concerned at the number of students heading abroad to study, both at school and universities.The international schools market has exploded in China in recent years after the authorities relaxed regulations for Chinese children attending foreign-owned schools. Until then, international schools almost entirely served the children of foreign nationals, but opening them up to Chinese children revealed a massive and previously untapped demand. For the growing Chinese middle class, the schools provided a more reliable route than Chinese national schools for getting into highly-regarded universities in the West, particularly those in the U.S. and U.K. These students, in turn, represent a lucrative source of income, for both the schools themselves and for Western universities.China is the largest source of international students at U.K. universities, accounting for more than one in five at undergraduate and postgraduate level. Some of the most prestigious private schools have sought to capitalize on their brand by opening branches in China in recent years. A record 14 British international schools have opened or are due to open in China this year. Despite the increased ____, there are still opportunities for international schools to open in China, given the "massive demand" among Chinese families. There is a deep desire amongst the wealthy, middle class and young Chinese parents for a Western-style of education. Parents want an international education but also want their children to retain their culture and identity as well as excellent exam results and "places at the top universities."Q.Choose the most appropriate word which is opposite in meaning to crackdown?

Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the questions by selecting the correct/most appropriate options:Increased time constraints and the need for convenience in raising children appear to offset parents concerns about the future when it comes to their carbon footprints, according to new research by University of Wyoming economists and a colleague in Sweden.UWs Jason Shogren and Linda Thunstrom, along with Jonas Nordstrom of the Lund University School of Economics and Management, have documented that two-adult households with children emit over 25 percent more carbon dioxide than two-adult households without children. Their research appears April 15 in PLOS One, a journal published by the Public Library of Science."While having children makes people focus more on the future and, presumably, care more about the environment, our study suggests that parenthood does not cause people to become greener," Shogren and Thunstrom say. "In fact, the difference in CO2 emissions between parents and non-parents is substantial, and thats primarily because of increased transportation and food consumption changes." The study involved an analysis of expenditures on goods and services by households in Sweden. The researchers found that parents with children at home consume goods and services that emit CO2 in the areas of food, such as meat, and transportation, such as gasoline, at higher rates than childless households.The economists note that time constraints become more binding, and convenience may become more important when people have children." Parents may need to be in more places in one day," resulting in people driving themselves instead of using public transportation or bicycling, the researchers wrote. "They also need to feed more people. Eating more pre-prepared, red meat carbon-intensive meals may add convenience and save time."The disparity in the carbon footprints of Swedish households with and without children is particularly striking, as concerns about climate change are more pronounced in Sweden than most other developed countries. Most Swedes believe climate change is real and have accepted sizable CO2 taxes, and households with children are subsidized, which helps to alleviate some of the time crunches for parents. Sweden has generous parental leave and subsidized daycare, and parents have a legal right to reduced work hours."If were finding these results in Sweden, its pretty safe to assume that the disparity in carbon footprints between parents and nonparents is even bigger in most other Western countries," Thunstrom says -- though she notes that Sweden also has one of the worlds highest female labour participation rates, which may add to the time constraints of household with children. "Becoming a parent can transform a person -- he or she thinks more about the future and worries about future risks imposed on their children and progeny," Shogren says. "But, while having children might be transformational, our results suggest that parents concerns about climate change do not cause them to be greener than non-parent adults."Q. Choose the word which is most nearly the OPPOSITE in meaning to the word Alleviate as highlighted in the passage.

Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the questions by selecting the correct/most appropriate options:Increased time constraints and the need for convenience in raising children appear to offset parents concerns about the future when it comes to their carbon footprints, according to new research by University of Wyoming economists and a colleague in Sweden.UWs Jason Shogren and Linda Thunstrom, along with Jonas Nordstrom of the Lund University School of Economics and Management, have documented that two-adult households with children emit over 25 percent more carbon dioxide than two-adult households without children. Their research appears April 15 in PLOS One, a journal published by the Public Library of Science."While having children makes people focus more on the future and, presumably, care more about the environment, our study suggests that parenthood does not cause people to become greener," Shogren and Thunstrom say. "In fact, the difference in CO2 emissions between parents and non-parents is substantial, and thats primarily because of increased transportation and food consumption changes." The study involved an analysis of expenditures on goods and services by households in Sweden. The researchers found that parents with children at home consume goods and services that emit CO2 in the areas of food, such as meat, and transportation, such as gasoline, at higher rates than childless households.The economists note that time constraints become more binding, and convenience may become more important when people have children." Parents may need to be in more places in one day," resulting in people driving themselves instead of using public transportation or bicycling, the researchers wrote. "They also need to feed more people. Eating more pre-prepared, red meat carbon-intensive meals may add convenience and save time."The disparity in the carbon footprints of Swedish households with and without children is particularly striking, as concerns about climate change are more pronounced in Sweden than most other developed countries. Most Swedes believe climate change is real and have accepted sizable CO2 taxes, and households with children are subsidized, which helps to alleviate some of the time crunches for parents. Sweden has generous parental leave and subsidized daycare, and parents have a legal right to reduced work hours."If were finding these results in Sweden, its pretty safe to assume that the disparity in carbon footprints between parents and nonparents is even bigger in most other Western countries," Thunstrom says -- though she notes that Sweden also has one of the worlds highest female labour participation rates, which may add to the time constraints of household with children. "Becoming a parent can transform a person -- he or she thinks more about the future and worries about future risks imposed on their children and progeny," Shogren says. "But, while having children might be transformational, our results suggest that parents concerns about climate change do not cause them to be greener than non-parent adults."Q.Choose the word which is most nearly the SIMILAR in meaning to the word Striking as highlighted in the passage.

Top Courses for Class 1View all

Top Courses for Class 1

Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 1 2025 is part of Class 1 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 1 exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 1 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 1. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 1 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Three children have different three birth months, but were all born in the same year. Mayank was born in April. Anshul was born after Mayank but before Shubham.Who is the oldest?a)Anshulb)Mayankc)Shubhamd)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 1 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 1 exam

Top Courses for Class 1

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup