CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Read the following passage carefully and answ... Start Learning for Free
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.
The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislator's task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.
When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.
The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.
Q. According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?
  • a)
    The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedy
  • b)
    The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failings
  • c)
    The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good life
  • d)
    The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powers
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which fo...
Para one states that “It is the legislator's task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible.” Hence, option C.
Option A is incorrect as "Prescribing a new constitution was not the remedy suggested in the passage. It stated " The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. " 
Option B is incorrect as it is not necessary for a lawmaker to be an outsider.
Option D is incorrect as reining in the profligate administrators is not the sole task of a lawmaker. Moreover, this was never explicitly mentioned in the passage.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.The author would most likely agree with which of the following statements?

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.Why, according to the paragraph, did Aristotle not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist?

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.Which of the following statements can be inferred from the paragraph?A. Lawmakers were legal experts who would draw up new constitutions when commissioned to do so by the publicB. Administrators of all Greek states were bound by the constitution and acted only within the confines of the constitutionC. Once Protagoras drew up the constitution of Athens, he would play no role in the day to day administration of Athens

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.TWhich of the following options is synonymous with the word “exhortations” as used in the paragraph?

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The 42nd amendment to the Constitution of India, which is officially known as The Constitution Act, 1976, was enacted during the National Emergency from 25 June 1975 - 21 March 1977 by the Indian National Congress government headed by Indira Gandhi.The 42nd Amendment is regarded as the most controversial constitutional amendment in Indias history. It attempted to reduce the power of the Supreme court and High courts to pronounce upon the constitutional validity of laws, and almost all parts of the Constitution, including the Preamble and amending clause, were changed by the 42nd Amendment, and some new articles and sections were inserted. It laid down the Fundamental Duties of Indian citizens to the nation.The amendments fifty-nine clauses stripped the Supreme Court of many of its powers and moved the political system toward parliamentary sovereignty. It curtailed democratic rights in the country, and gave sweeping powers to the Prime Minister’s Office. The amendment gave Parliament unrestrained power to amend any parts of the Constitution, without judicial review. It transferred more power from the state governments to the central government, eroding Indias federal structure. The 42nd Amendment also amended the Preamble and changed the description of India from "Sovereign Democratic Republic to a "sovereign socialistic secular democratic republic", and also changed the words "unity of the nation" to "unity and integrity of the nation". Most provisions of the amendment came into effect on 3 January 1977, others were enforced from 1 February and Section 27 came into force on 1 April 1977. This amendment brought about the most widespread changes to the Constitution in its history, and is sometimes called a "mini-Constitution" or the "Constitution of Indira".The Emergency era had been widely unpopular, and the 42nd Amendment was the most controversial issue. The clampdown on civil liberties and widespread abuse of human rights by police angered the public. The Janata Party which had promised to "restore the Constitution to the condition it was in before the Emergency", won the 1977 general elections. The Janata Government then brought about the 43rd and 44th Amendments in 1977 and 1978 respectively, to restore the pre-1976 position to some extent. However, the Janata Party was not able to fully achieve its objectives.On 31 July 1980, in its judgement on Minerva Mills v/s Union of states, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional two provisions of the 42nd Amendment which prevent any constitutional amendment from being called in question in any Court on any ground and accord precedence to the Directive Principles of State Policy over the Fundamental Rights of individuals respectively. This respectively amends mostly the whole constitution, hence is called a mini-constitution.Q.Why was the 42nd amendment called the Constitution of Indira?

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions which follow.The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. For Aristotle did not separate the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life, but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society, and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries, that finds expression not in moral exhortations but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. We are accustomed since the growth of the historical method to the belief that states are "not made but grow," and are apt to be impatient with the belief which Aristotle and Plato show in the powers of the lawgiver. But however true the maxim may be of the modern nation state, it was not true of the much smaller and more self-conscious Greek city.When Aristotle talks of the legislator, he is not talking in the air. Students of the Academy had been actually called on to give new constitutions to Greek states. For the Greeks the constitution was not merely as it is so often with us, a matter of political machinery. It was regarded as a way of life. Further, the constitution within the framework of which the ordinary process of administration and passing of decrees went on, was always regarded as the work of a special man or body of men, the lawgivers. All Greek states, except those perversions which Aristotle criticizes as being "above law," worked under rigid constitutions, and the constitution was only changed when the whole people gave a commission to a lawgiver to draw up a new one.The lawgiver was not an ordinary politician. He was a state doctor, called in to prescribe for an ailing constitution. When the people of Cyrene asked the oracle of Delphi to help them in their dissensions, the oracle told them to go to Mantinea, and the Mantineans lent them Demonax, who acted as a "setter straight" and drew up a new constitution for Cyrene. So again the Athenians, when they were founding their model new colony at Thurii, employed Hippodamus of Miletus as the best expert in town-planning, to plan the streets of the city, and Protagoras as the best expert in law-making, to give the city its laws. The Greeks thought administration should be democratic and law-making the work of experts. We think more naturally of law-making as the special right of the people and administration as necessarily confined to experts.Q.According to the passage, what was the lawgivers task?a)The lawgiver was an expert who would mediate whenever discord arose in a society and prescribe a new constitution as a remedyb)The lawgiver was an outsider to the society who could impartially view the failings of the society and frame laws to overcome these failingsc)The lawgiver was a craftsman whose job was to create the framework for the society so they can live a good lifed)The lawgiver was tasked with reining in the profligate administrators and drafting laws that would act as a check on their powersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev