Question Description
Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.I think Indian firms have achieved the highest levels of efficiency in the world software outsourcing industry. Some researchers have assumed that Indian firms use the same programming languages and techniques as Chinese firms but have benefited from their familiarity with English, the language used to write software code. However, if this were true, then one would expect software vendors in Hong Kong, where most people speak English, to perform not worse than Indian vendors do. However, this is obviously not the case.Other researchers link high Indian productivity to higher levels of human resource investment per engineer. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Indian vendors matched and then doubled Chinese productivity levels in the mid-eighties, human resource investment per employee was comparable to that of Chinese vendors. Furthermore, by the late eighties, the amount of fixed assets required to develop one software package was roughly equivalent in India and in China. Since human resource investment was not higher in India, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity.A more fruitful explanation may lie with Indian strategic approach in outsourcing. Indian software vendors did not simply seek outsourced contract more effectively: they made aggressive strategy in outsourcing. For instance, most software firms of India were initially set up to outsource the contract in western countries, such as the United States. By contrary, most Chinese firms seem to position their business in China, a promising yet under-developed market. However, rampant piracy in China took almost 90 percent of potential market, making it impossible for most Chinese firms to obtain sufficient compensation for the investment on development and research, let alone thrive in competitive environment.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is true about Indian software developers?a)Their productivity levels did not equal those of Chinese software engineers until the late eighties.b)Their high efficiency levels were a direct result of English language familiarity.c)They developed component-specific software.d)They built products to meet outsourcing requirements of the western orders.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.