Question Description
Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2024 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Anil sold stolen goods to Arvind and Arvind bought the said goods in good faith. Now the real owner of goods claims the goods from Arvind. In this case-----------.a)The sale of goods by Anil is valid because goods were in his possessionb)Arvind becomes owner of goods because he bought in good faithc)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is applicabled)The maxim, “Nemo dat quad non habet” is not applicable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.