Question Description
Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:Re ad the following case let and choose the best alternative.Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loha India Ltd., (a steel manufacturing company) had just been visited by several other directors of the company.The directors were upset with recent actions of the company president, Mr. Ganesh Thakur. They demanded that the board consider firing the president.Mr. Thakur, recently appointed as president, had undertaken to solve some of the management-employees problems by dealing directly with the individuals, as often as possible. The company did not have a history of strikes or any other form of collective action and was considered to have a good work culture. However, Mr. Thakur felt that by dealing directly with individuals, he could portray the management’s concern for the employees. An important initiative of Mr. Thakur was to negotiate wages of the supervisors with each supervisor. In these negotiation meetings he would not involve anyone else, including the Personnel Department which reported to him, so as to take an unbiased decision. After negotiation, a wage contract would be drawn up for each supervisor. This, he felt, would recognise and reward the better performers. Mr. Thakur successfully implemented the process for most of the supervisors, except those working in the night shift. For them he had drawn up the contracts unilaterally benchmarking the wages of supervisors of night shift with that of supervisors of the day shift.For several days Ram Lal a night shift supervisor, had been trying to seek an appointment with Mr. Thakur about his wages. He was disgruntled, not only over his failure to see the president, but also over the lack of discussions about his wage contract prior to its being effected. As a family man with six dependents, he felt his weekly wage should be higher than that granted to him.Last Thursday afternoon Ram Lal stopped by the president’s office and tried to see him.Mr. Thakur ’s secretary refused his request on the grounds that Mr. Thakur was busy.Infuriated, Ram Lal stormed into the president’s office and confronted the startled Mr.Thakur, with his demands for a better wage. Mr. Thakur stood up and told Ram Lal to get out of his office and express his grievance through official channel. Ram Lal took a swing at the president who in turn punched Ram Lal on the jaw and knocked him unconscious.Q.The most important causal factor for this entire episode could be:a)Legalistic approach to employee problems.b)Trying to follow a divide-and-rule policy in his dealings with the supervisors.c)Paternalistic approach towards mature individuals in the organisation.d)Inconsistent dealings of Mr. Thakur with supervisors.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.