Question Description
Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for SSC CGL 2024 is part of SSC CGL preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SSC CGL exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SSC CGL 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SSC CGL. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SSC CGL Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows by selecting the most appropriate option.The real indictment against colonialism was to be found in the villages of India. There was a rot at the top, too, in the thousands of young intellectuals trained in English schools for jobs that did not exist except in the limited Civil Service. The towns and cities were frothing with unhappy young men, cultured and well educated, who could find no jobs and were not allowed by the old superstructure of empire to create them.But the real proof of evil, I say again, was in the miserable villages. I thought I had seen poverty in China, yet when I saw the Indian villages, I knew that the Chinese peasant was rich in comparison. Only the Russian peasant I had seen years before, could be compared with the Indian villager, although that Russian was a very different creature and inferior in many ways.And the children, the little children of the Indian villages how they tore at my heart: thin, big bellied, and all with huge dark eyes! I wondered that any English could look at them and not excuse himself three hundred years of English occupation and rule, and could there be children like this? Yes, and millions of them!And the final indictment surely was that the life span in India was only twenty-seven years. Twenty-seven years! No wonder then that a man married very young so that there could be children, as many as possible before he died. I loved England, remembering all the happy journeys there, but in India I saw an England I did not know.Q. Even the city people were not happy becausea)there were not enough jobs for allb)the trade was under the colonial controlc)there were a large number of young intellectualsd)business was not flourishingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SSC CGL tests.