GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclis... Start Learning for Free
A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiast's argument?
  • a)
    Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.
  • b)
    The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.
  • c)
    Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.
  • d)
    In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.
  • e)
    Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when rid...
A. Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.
This option does not weaken the argument. The fact that most cyclists do not currently own helmets does not address the effectiveness of helmets in preventing serious injuries.
B. The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.
This option does not weaken the argument. While it presents a cost perspective, it does not directly address the effectiveness of helmets in preventing serious injuries.
C. Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.
This option weakens the argument by challenging the effectiveness of helmets in preventing head trauma. If helmets tend to fall off during accidents and are not useful in preventing head injuries, it undermines the argument that mandatory helmet use would decrease the number of serious injuries.
D. In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.
This option does not weaken the argument. The lower number of injuries in the city compared to the national average does not address the effectiveness of helmets in preventing serious injuries.
E. Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.
This option most seriously weakens the argument. If most serious injuries in bike accidents are caused by head trauma, it supports the argument for mandatory helmet use. It suggests that wearing a helmet can significantly reduce the risk of head injuries and supports the need for the proposed ordinance.
Therefore, option (E) weakens the argument the most by providing evidence that head trauma is a primary cause of serious injuries in bike accidents, reinforcing the importance of helmets in preventing such injuries.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev