A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclis...

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiast's argument?

a)
Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.
b)
The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.
c)
Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.
d)
In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.
e)
Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when rid...

A. Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.
This option does not weaken the argument. The fact that most cyclists do not currently own helmets does not address the effectiveness of helmets in preventing serious injuries.

B. The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.
This option does not weaken the argument. While it presents a cost perspective, it does not directly address the effectiveness of helmets in preventing serious injuries.

C. Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.
This option weakens the argument by challenging the effectiveness of helmets in preventing head trauma. If helmets tend to fall off during accidents and are not useful in preventing head injuries, it undermines the argument that mandatory helmet use would decrease the number of serious injuries.

D. In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.
This option does not weaken the argument. The lower number of injuries in the city compared to the national average does not address the effectiveness of helmets in preventing serious injuries.

E. Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.
This option most seriously weakens the argument. If most serious injuries in bike accidents are caused by head trauma, it supports the argument for mandatory helmet use. It suggests that wearing a helmet can significantly reduce the risk of head injuries and supports the need for the proposed ordinance.

Therefore, option (E) weakens the argument the most by providing evidence that head trauma is a primary cause of serious injuries in bike accidents, reinforcing the importance of helmets in preventing such injuries.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

A proposed ordinance requires the installation in new homes of sprinklers automatically triggered by the presence of a fire. However, a home builder argued that because more than ninety percent of residential fires are extinguished by a household member, residential sprinklers would only marginally decrease property damage caused by residential fires.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the home builders argument?

View answer

Marginal analysis is an important decision-making tool in the business world. Pricing decisions tend to heavily involve analysis regarding marginal contributions to revenues and costs. In business, the practice of setting the price of a product to equal the extra cost of producing an extra unit of output, i.e. the marginal cost of producing the unit, is known as marginal-cost pricing. In the marginal analysis of pricing decisions, if marginal revenue, the increase in revenue from the sale of an additional unit of output, is greater than marginal cost at some level of output, marginal profit is positive, and, therefore, a greater quantity should be produced. Alternatively, if marginal revenue is less than the marginal cost, marginal profit is negative and a lesser quantity should be produced. Accordingly, firms tend to use this analysis to increase their production until marginal revenue equals marginal cost, and then charge a price which is determined by the demand curve. For instance, businesses often set prices close to marginal cost during periods of poor sales. If, for example, an item has a marginal cost of $1.00 and a normal selling price of $2.00, the firm selling the item might wish to lower the price to $1.10 - if demand has waned. The business would choose this approach because the incremental profit of 10 cents from the transaction is better than no sale at all.Which of the following is supported by the information given in the passage?

View answer

Marginal analysis is an important decision-making tool in the business world. Pricing decisions tend to heavily involve analysis regarding marginal contributions to revenues and costs. In business, the practice of setting the price of a product to equal the extra cost of producing an extra unit of output, i.e. the marginal cost of producing the unit, is known as marginal-cost pricing. In the marginal analysis of pricing decisions, if marginal revenue, the increase in revenue from the sale of an additional unit of output, is greater than marginal cost at some level of output, marginal profit is positive, and, therefore, a greater quantity should be produced. Alternatively, if marginal revenue is less than the marginal cost, marginal profit is negative and a lesser quantity should be produced. Accordingly, firms tend to use this analysis to increase their production until marginal revenue equals marginal cost, and then charge a price which is determined by the demand curve. For instance, businesses often set prices close to marginal cost during periods of poor sales. If, for example, an item has a marginal cost of $1.00 and a normal selling price of $2.00, the firm selling the item might wish to lower the price to $1.10 - if demand has waned. The business would choose this approach because the incremental profit of 10 cents from the transaction is better than no sale at all.Which of the following is stated in the passage?

View answer

A survey was conducted among a group of 83 American travel enthusiasts to determine the countries that the group members had visited. The data collected in the survey is summarized as below: 40 had visited Australia 30 had visited Belgium 20 had visited Chile 8 had visited Australia and Belgium 12 had visited Belgium and Chile 4 had visited Australia and Chile 14 had visited none of the three countriesWhat is the number of surveyed travel enthusiasts who had visited all the three countries?

View answer

A powder derived from the North American Echinacea flower, which has beeneffective in preventing colds, is grown by many small farmers out West.

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiasts argument?a)Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.b)The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.c)Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.d)In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.e)Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam