All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
SAT Exam  >  SAT Questions  >  If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16,... Start Learning for Free
If (a + b)2 – 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?
  • a)
    -16
  • b)
    -14
  • c)
    -18
  • d)
    -20
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your SAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the val...
(a + b)2 – 2(a + b) = 80
⇒ (a + b)2 – 2(a + b) + 1 = 81
⇒ (a + b – 1)2 = 81
⇒ a + b – 1 = 9
⇒ a + b = 10
given ab = 16
⇒ a = 8 and b = 2
⇒ 3a – 19b = 24 – 38 = -14
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the val...
Given Equations
We start with the equations:
- (a + b)² - 2(a + b) = 80
- ab = 16

Step 1: Simplify the First Equation
We can rewrite the first equation:
- Let x = a + b.
- The equation becomes x² - 2x = 80.
Rearranging gives us:
- x² - 2x - 80 = 0.

Step 2: Solve the Quadratic Equation
To find x, we can use the quadratic formula:
- x = [-b ± √(b² - 4ac)] / 2a
- Here, a = 1, b = -2, c = -80.
Calculating the discriminant:
- Discriminant = (-2)² - 4(1)(-80) = 4 + 320 = 324.
Thus:
- x = [2 ± √324] / 2
- x = [2 ± 18] / 2.
This gives us:
- x = 10 or x = -8.

Step 3: Determine a and b
We have two cases for (a + b):
1. If a + b = 10, then:
- ab = 16.
- The roots are found using: t² - (a + b)t + ab = 0.
- t² - 10t + 16 = 0.
- Discriminant = 100 - 64 = 36.
- Roots are: t = 8 and t = 2, thus (a, b) = (8, 2) or (2, 8).
2. If a + b = -8, then:
- ab = 16.
- t² + 8t + 16 = 0.
- Discriminant = 64 - 64 = 0.
- Roots are: t = -4 (double root), thus (a, b) = (-4, -4).

Step 4: Calculate 3a - 19b
1. For (a, b) = (8, 2):
- 3a - 19b = 3(8) - 19(2) = 24 - 38 = -14.
2. For (a, b) = (-4, -4):
- 3(-4) - 19(-4) = -12 + 76 = 64 (not valid).

Final Answer
Thus, the valid value for 3a - 19b is:
- **-14**, which corresponds to option (B).
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Similar SAT Doubts

Question based on the following passages.Passage 1 is adapted from an essay written by John Aldridge in 1951. ©1951 by John Aldridge. Passage 2 is adapted from Brom Weber, "Ernest Hemingways Genteel Bullfight," published in The American Novel and the Nineteen Twenties. ©1971 by Hodder Education.Passage 1By the time we were old enough to readHemingway, he had become legendary. LikeLord Byron a century earlier, he had learnedto play himself, his own best hero, with superb(5) conviction. He was Hemingway of the ruggedoutdoor grin and the hairy chest posing beside alion he had just shot. He was Tarzan Hemingway,crouching in the African bush with elephant gunat ready. He was War Correspondent Hemingway(10) writing a play in the Hotel Florida in Madridwhile thirty fascist shells crashed throughthe roof. Later, he was Task Force Hemingwayswathed in ammunition belts and defendinghis post singlehandedly against fierce German(15) attacks.But even without the legend, the chestbeating, wisecracking pose that was later toseem so incredibly absurd, his impact upon uswas tremendous. The feeling he gave us was one(20) of immense expansiveness, freedom and, at thesame time, absolute stability and control. Wecould follow him, imitate his cold detachment,through all the doubts and fears of adolescenceand come out pure and untouched. The words(25) he put down seemed to us to have been carvedfrom the living stone of life. They conveyedexactly the taste, smell and feel of experience asit was, as it might possibly be. And so we beganunconsciously to translate our own sensations(30) into their terms and to impose on everythingwe did and felt the particular emotions theyaroused in us.The Hemingway time was a good time tobe young. We had much then that the war later(35) forced out of us, something far greater thanHemingways strong formative influence.Later writers who lost or got rid of Hemingwayhave been able to find nothing to put in hisplace. They have rejected his time as untrue(40) for them only to fail at finding themselves in theirown time. Others, in their embarrassment at thehold he once had over them, have not profitedby the lessons he had to teach, and still otherswere never touched by him at all. These last are(45) perhaps the real unfortunates, for they have beendenied access to a powerful tradition.Passage 2One wonders why Hemingways greatestworks now seem unable to evoke the same senseof a tottering world that in the 1920s established(50) Ernest Hemingways reputation. These novelsshould be speaking to us. Our social structureis as shaken, our philosophical despair as great,our everyday experience as unsatisfying. We havehad more war than Hemingway ever dreamed(55) of. Our violence—physical, emotional, andintellectual—is not inferior to that of the 1920s.Yet Hemingways great novels no longer seem topenetrate deeply the surface of existence.One begins to doubt that they ever did so significantly(60) in the 1920s.Hemingways novels indulged the dominantgenteel tradition in American culture whileseeming to repudiate it. They yielded to thefunctionalist, technological aesthetic of the(65) culture instead of resisting in the manner ofFrank Lloyd Wright. Hemingway, in effect, became adupe of his culture rather than its moral-aestheticconscience. As a consequence, the import of hiswork has diminished. There is some evidence(70) from his stylistic evolution that Hemingwayhimself must have felt as much, for Hemingwaysfamous stylistic economy frequently seems toconceal another kind of writer, with much richerrhetorical resources to hand. So, Death in the(75) Afternoon (1932), Hemingways bullfightingopus and his first book after A Farewell to Arms(1929), reveals great uneasiness over his earlieraccomplishment. In it, he defends his literarymethod with a doctrine of ambiguity: “If a writer(80) of prose knows enough about what he is writingabout he may omit things that he knows andthe reader, if the writer is writing truly enough,will have a feeling of those things as strongly asthough the writer had stated them.”(85) Hemingway made much the same theoreticalpoint in another way in Death in the Afternoonapparently believing that a formal reduction ofaesthetic complexity was the only kind of designthat had value.(90) Perhaps the greatest irony of Death in theAfternoon is its unmistakably baroque prose,which Hemingway himself embarrassedlyadmitted was “flowery.” Reviewers, unable tochallenge Hemingways expertise in the art of(95) bullfighting, noted that its style was “awkward,tortuous, [and] belligerently clumsy.”Death in the Afternoon is an extraordinarilyself-indulgent, unruly, clownish, garrulous,and satiric book, with scrambled chronologies,(100) willful digressions, mock-scholarly apparatuses,fictional interludes, and scathing allusions. Itsinflated style can hardly penetrate the fagade, letalone deflate humanity.Q.Which pair of sentences provides the strongest evidence for the answer to the previous question?

Question are based on the following passages and supplementary material.Passage 1 is from F. J. Medina, “How to Talk about Sustainability." ©2015 College Hill Coaching. Passage 2 is adapted from an essay published in 2005 about the economic analysis of environmental decisions.Passage 1Many proponents of recycling assume thatrecycling industrial, domestic, and commercialmaterials does less harm to the environment thandoes extracting new raw materials. Opponents, on(5) the other hand, scrutinize the costs of recycling,arguing that recycling programs often waste moremoney than they save, and that companies canoften produce new products more cheaply thanthey can recycle old ones. The discussion usually(10) devolves into a political battle between theenemies of the economy and the enemies of theenvironment.This demonization serves the debaters(and their fundraisers) but not the debate.(15) Environmentalists are not all ignorant anarchists,and opponents of recycling are not all rapaciousblowhards. For real solutions, we must soberlycompare the many costs and benefits of recyclingwith the many costs and benefits of disposal, as(20) if we are all stewards of both the earth and theeconomy.We must examine the full life cycles ofvarious materials, and the broad effects thesecycles have on both the environment and(25) economy. When debating the cost of a newroad, for instance, it is not enough to simplyconsider the cost of the labor or the provenanceof the materials. We must ask, what naturalbenefits, like water filtration and animal and(30) plant habitats, are being lost in the construction?Where will the road materials be in a hundredyears, and what will they be doing? What kindsof industries will the road construction andmaintenance support? How will the extra traffic(35) affect air and noise quality, or safety? Is the roadmade of local or imported materials? Are anymaterials being imported from countries withirresponsible labor or environmental practices?Is the contractor chosen through a fair and open(40) bidding process? How might the road surfaceaffect the life span or efficiency of the cars drivingon it? What will be the annual maintenance cost,financially and environmentally?Appreciating opposing viewpoints can lead(45) to important insights. Perhaps nature can doa more efficient and safer job of reusing wastematter than a recycling plant can. Perhaps aneconomic system that accounts for environmentalcosts and benefits will lead to a higher standard(50) of living for the average citizen. Perhaps insertingsome natural resources into a responsible“industrial cycle” is better for the environmentthan conserving those resources. Exploring suchpossibilities openly and respectfully will lead us(55) more reliably to both a healthier economy and ahealthier environment.Passage 2When trying to quantify the costs andbenefits of preserving our natural ecosystems,one difficulty lies in the diffuseness of these(60) effects. Economists have a relatively easy timewith commerce, because money and goods canbe tracked through a series of point-to-pointexchanges. When you pay for something, theexchange of money makes the accounting simple.(65) The diffuse, unchosen costs and benefits thataffect all of us daily—annoying commercials or abeautiful sunset, for instance—are much harderto evaluate.The benefits that ecosystems provide, like(70) biodiversity, the filtration of groundwater, themaintenance of the oxygen and nitrogen cycles,and climate stability, however, are not bought-and-sold commodities. Without them our liveswould deteriorate dramatically, but they are(75) not part of a clear exchange, so they fall into theclass of benefits and costs that economists call“externalities.”The “good feeling” that many people haveabout recycling and maintaining environmental(80) quality is just such an externality. Antienvironmentalists often ridicule such feelingsas unquantifiable, but their value is real: somestock funds only invest in companies with goodenvironmental records, and environmental(85) litigation can have steep costs in terms of moneyand goodwill.Robert Costanza, formerly of the Centerfor Environmental Science at the Universityof Maryland, has attempted to quantify these(90) “external” ecological benefits by tallying thecost to replace natures services. Imagine, forinstance, paving over the Florida Everglades andthen building systems to restore its lost benefits,such as gas conversion and sequestering,(95) food production, water filtration, and weatherregulation. How much would it cost to keep thesesystems running? Not even accounting for someof the most important externalities, like naturalbeauty, the cost would be extraordinarily high.(100) Costanza places it “conservatively” at $33 trilliondollars annually, far more than the economicoutput of all of the countries in the world.Some object to Costanzas cost analysis.Environmentalists argue that we cannot possibly(105) put a price on the smell of heather and a coolbreeze, while industrialists argue that the taskis speculative, unreliable, and an impedimentto economic progress. Nevertheless, Costanzaswork is among the most cited in the fields of(110) environmental science and economics. Forany flaws it might have, his work is giving acommon vocabulary to industrialists andenvironmentalists alike, which we must do ifwe are to coordinate intelligent environmental(115) policy with responsible economic policy.Q.Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

Question based on the following passages.Passage 1 is adapted from an essay written by John Aldridge in 1951. ©1951 by John Aldridge. Passage 2 is adapted from Brom Weber, "Ernest Hemingways Genteel Bullfight," published in The American Novel and the Nineteen Twenties. ©1971 by Hodder Education.Passage 1By the time we were old enough to readHemingway, he had become legendary. LikeLord Byron a century earlier, he had learnedto play himself, his own best hero, with superb(5) conviction. He was Hemingway of the ruggedoutdoor grin and the hairy chest posing beside alion he had just shot. He was Tarzan Hemingway,crouching in the African bush with elephant gunat ready. He was War Correspondent Hemingway(10) writing a play in the Hotel Florida in Madridwhile thirty fascist shells crashed throughthe roof. Later, he was Task Force Hemingwayswathed in ammunition belts and defendinghis post singlehandedly against fierce German(15) attacks.But even without the legend, the chestbeating, wisecracking pose that was later toseem so incredibly absurd, his impact upon uswas tremendous. The feeling he gave us was one(20) of immense expansiveness, freedom and, at thesame time, absolute stability and control. Wecould follow him, imitate his cold detachment,through all the doubts and fears of adolescenceand come out pure and untouched. The words(25) he put down seemed to us to have been carvedfrom the living stone of life. They conveyedexactly the taste, smell and feel of experience asit was, as it might possibly be. And so we beganunconsciously to translate our own sensations(30) into their terms and to impose on everythingwe did and felt the particular emotions theyaroused in us.The Hemingway time was a good time tobe young. We had much then that the war later(35) forced out of us, something far greater thanHemingways strong formative influence.Later writers who lost or got rid of Hemingwayhave been able to find nothing to put in hisplace. They have rejected his time as untrue(40) for them only to fail at finding themselves in theirown time. Others, in their embarrassment at thehold he once had over them, have not profitedby the lessons he had to teach, and still otherswere never touched by him at all. These last are(45) perhaps the real unfortunates, for they have beendenied access to a powerful tradition.Passage 2One wonders why Hemingways greatestworks now seem unable to evoke the same senseof a tottering world that in the 1920s established(50) Ernest Hemingways reputation. These novelsshould be speaking to us. Our social structureis as shaken, our philosophical despair as great,our everyday experience as unsatisfying. We havehad more war than Hemingway ever dreamed(55) of. Our violence—physical, emotional, andintellectual—is not inferior to that of the 1920s.Yet Hemingways great novels no longer seem topenetrate deeply the surface of existence.One begins to doubt that they ever did so significantly(60) in the 1920s.Hemingways novels indulged the dominantgenteel tradition in American culture whileseeming to repudiate it. They yielded to thefunctionalist, technological aesthetic of the(65) culture instead of resisting in the manner ofFrank Lloyd Wright. Hemingway, in effect, became adupe of his culture rather than its moral-aestheticconscience. As a consequence, the import of hiswork has diminished. There is some evidence(70) from his stylistic evolution that Hemingwayhimself must have felt as much, for Hemingwaysfamous stylistic economy frequently seems toconceal another kind of writer, with much richerrhetorical resources to hand. So, Death in the(75) Afternoon (1932), Hemingways bullfightingopus and his first book after A Farewell to Arms(1929), reveals great uneasiness over his earlieraccomplishment. In it, he defends his literarymethod with a doctrine of ambiguity: “If a writer(80) of prose knows enough about what he is writingabout he may omit things that he knows andthe reader, if the writer is writing truly enough,will have a feeling of those things as strongly asthough the writer had stated them.”(85) Hemingway made much the same theoreticalpoint in another way in Death in the Afternoonapparently believing that a formal reduction ofaesthetic complexity was the only kind of designthat had value.(90) Perhaps the greatest irony of Death in theAfternoon is its unmistakably baroque prose,which Hemingway himself embarrassedlyadmitted was “flowery.” Reviewers, unable tochallenge Hemingways expertise in the art of(95) bullfighting, noted that its style was “awkward,tortuous, [and] belligerently clumsy.”Death in the Afternoon is an extraordinarilyself-indulgent, unruly, clownish, garrulous,and satiric book, with scrambled chronologies,(100) willful digressions, mock-scholarly apparatuses,fictional interludes, and scathing allusions. Itsinflated style can hardly penetrate the fagade, letalone deflate humanity.Q.Which statement provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

Question based on the following passage.This passage is adapted from Marie Myung-Ok Lee, Somebody’s Daughter. ©2006 Beacon Press. The story is about a Korean-American girl adopted by an American family and raised in the Midwest.When I was eight, they told me that my mother’sdeath was preordained. She had been murdered.One Sunday after service, our minister,Reverend Jansen of the Lutheran Church of the(5)Good Shepherd, bent down in a cloud of AquaVelva to explain. We had been learning in Sundayschool about Heaven and Hell, and in the middleof class I had fallen into a panic, wondering howI would recognize my Korean mother when I saw(10)her in Heaven—or in Hell, if perhaps she and Iboth sinned too much.Not to worry, I was told.“God called your Korean parents home sothat you could become the daughter of your(15)mother and father,” he said, his eyes slidingsidewise, for just a second. His breath smelledvaguely of toast.“It was all part of His plan—you see how muchyour mommy and daddy love you? When the time(20)comes, if you’re a very good girl, you, your mommy,daddy, and your sister, Amanda—the wholeThorson family—will be in heaven together, thanksto the Lord’s wonderful and mysterious ways.”“That’s why we named you Sarah,” Christine(25)and Ken added. “Because it means ‘God’sprecious treasure.’”God kills, I thought then. The same God whobrought us Christmas and the Easter Bunny—hemurdered my mother.(30)Shortly after that Sunday, I brought upmy Korean mother again, asking about the caraccident, how it happened, exactly—was it likePhil Haag’s father, who fell asleep at the wheel? Orlike our plumber’s teenage son who drove into a(35)semi head-on?“Sarah,” Christine said patiently, lookingup from the chopping board, where she wasslicing carrot discs for pot roast. “We really knewnothing about her. I’m your mommy. Let’s not(40)talk about this any more, it makes me sad.” Shemade little crying motions, pretending to wipeaway tears, the same thing she did when I wasbad, to show how I had disappointed her.I grew up in a house in which Korea had(45)always been the oddly charged word, never to bementioned in connection to me, the same waywe never said “Uncle Henry” and “alcoholic” inthe same sentence. It was almost as if Ken andChristine thought I needed to be protected from(50)it, the way small children need to be protectedfrom boors itching to tell them that Santa Clausis not real.The ban on Korea extended even tothe aforementioned Uncle Henry, who was thendeprived of his war stories at our Memorial Day(55)cookouts. Although he proudly wore his felt VFWhat with its flurry of pins, including ones from histour “overseas,” Christine or Ken would quietlyslip him some of his favorite Pabst or Schlitz, andin return he’d set up residence in the lawn chair(60)at the far corner of our yard, away from everyone.Somewhere back in the fuzzy clot of myteens (now, I’m at the worldly-wise age of almost-twenty), the ’88 Summer Olympics were heldin Seoul. We couldn’t buck the Thorson family(65)tradition of watching absolutely everything (thatwinter we’d raptly watched curling, for God’ssakes!). But I was aware that pains were takento modulate voices, vocal cords twisted to anexcruciating, studied casualness until Korea(70)came out “Korea,” exactly the same way we’d say“Russia” or “Carl Lewis” or “Flo-Jo.”Then Bryant Gumbel invaded our living roomwith his special segment on how Korea, one of thefour “Little Tiger” economic miracle countries,(75)was so enterprising that it had even made anexport product out of its babies. Since the KoreanWar, more than a hundred thousand children,Made-in-Korea stamped on their foreheads, hadleft the country, their adoption fees fattening the(80)government coffers.Top that, Singapore! Gumbel’s cheery smirkseemed to say.“Well, Sarah’s really American, not Kor—”Amanda began, until the look on Christine’s(85)face—despairing, fierce—stopped her.We invent what becomes us.Q. Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

Top Courses for SATView all

Top Courses for SAT

If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for SAT 2025 is part of SAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SAT exam syllabus. Information about If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice If (a + b)2– 2(a + b) = 80 and ab = 16, then what can be the value of 3a – 19b?a)-16b)-14c)-18d)-20Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SAT tests.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Top Courses for SAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup