All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Many state legislatures are considering propo... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?
  • a)
    Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.
  • b)
    During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.
  • c)
    Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.
  • d)
    Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.
  • e)
    Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that c...
The critics of the proposals argue that public referenda would be biased due to the influence of wealthy special-interest groups through television advertisements. To strengthen their argument, we need to find an option that supports the claim that wealthy special-interest groups can indeed influence voters' views through television advertisements.
Option (C) provides the most direct support for the critics' argument. It states that proponents of policies opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations. This suggests that wealthy special-interest groups have an advantage in shaping public opinion through television advertisements, potentially leading to biased outcomes in public referenda.
Option (A) provides a reason why state legislators might support public referenda but does not directly address the influence of wealthy special-interest groups through television advertisements.
Option (B) discusses the number of people voting in elections and does not provide direct support for the influence of television advertisements on voters' views in public referenda.
Option (D) suggests opposing positions by special-interest groups, but it does not specifically address the influence of television advertisements on voters' views.
Option (E) discusses the reluctance of television stations to associate with a particular political opinion, but it does not directly support the claim that wealthy special-interest groups can influence voters' views through television advertisements.
Therefore, option (C) is the most suitable choice that strengthens the critics' argument.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.Q.The passage suggests which of the following about African American slaves in the late 1700s?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?a)Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.b)During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.c)Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.d)Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.e)Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup