Some people think that in every barrel of politicians there are only a...
The author's main argument is that in order to be an effective politician, one must be deceitful. They believe that politicians need to be dishonest in order to perform their job properly. Based on this reasoning, the author concludes that all effective politicians are rotten.
Now let's examine each option:
(A) Some people think all politicians are rotten.
This statement is consistent with the author's argument, as they claim that all effective politicians are rotten. Therefore, option (A) can be true.
(B) Some politicians are scrupulously honest.
This statement contradicts the author's argument that effective politicians must be deceitful. If there are politicians who are scrupulously honest, it implies that they can still be effective, which goes against the author's belief. Therefore, option (B) cannot be true.
(C) Some people define a politician’s job as obeying the rules of society.
This statement does not directly relate to the author's argument about deceitfulness and effectiveness. It introduces a different perspective on defining a politician's job. Therefore, option (C) can be true.
(D) Some deceitful politicians are ineffective.
This statement does not contradict the author's argument. It is possible to have deceitful politicians who are not effective for various reasons. Therefore, option (D) can be true.
(E) Some scrupulously honest politicians are effective.
This statement directly contradicts the author's argument that all effective politicians must be deceitful. If there are scrupulously honest politicians who are still effective, it undermines the author's claim. Therefore, option (E) cannot be true.
In conclusion, the statement that CANNOT be true based on the author's argument is option (E) – "Some scrupulously honest politicians are effective."