Question Description
Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meatone based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the bold-faced part?a)It is used to disprove the vegetarian position that we should not eat meat.b)It is used to show that the two types of reasons cited in favor of vegetarianism are independent.c)It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.d)It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.e)It is used to show that there is no sufficient reason for not eating meat.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.