All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are... Start Learning for Free
Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.
Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.
Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?
  • a)
    Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.
  • b)
    The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.
  • c)
    The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.
  • d)
    Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.
  • e)
    If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep...
(A) Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.
This option is a point of agreement between Sam and Meli, as both of them believe that humans should intervene to protect the bighorn sheep.
(B) The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.
There is no explicit disagreement between Sam and Meli regarding this statement. It is possible that both of them agree with this idea, as they are concerned about the survival of the bighorn sheep.
(C) The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.
There is no indication in the given statements that Sam and Meli have any disagreement about the relative ease of preserving the mountain lions or the bighorn sheep. So this option is not the point of disagreement.
(D) Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.
There is no clear disagreement between Sam and Meli about this statement. Both individuals might agree that limiting the mountain lion population could have detrimental effects. So this option is not the point of disagreement.
(E) If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.
This option represents the point of disagreement between Sam and Meli. Sam believes that they should let nature take its course and hope the bighorn sheep survive, suggesting that not limiting the mountain lion population may not lead to the extinction of the bighorn sheep. On the other hand, Meli disagrees and believes that they should do what they can to ensure the survival of the bighorn sheep, implying that not limiting the mountain lion population will result in the demise of the bighorn sheep species.
Therefore, the correct answer is (E) If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose thebest answer for each question.RESIDENTS of Lozère, a hilly department in southern France, recite complaints familiar tomany rural corners of Europe. In remote hamlets and villages, with names such as Le Baconand Le Bacon Vieux, mayors grumble about a lack of local schools, jobs, or phone andinternet connections. Farmers of grazing animals add another concern: the return of wolves.Eradicated from France last century, the predators are gradually creeping back to moreforests and hillsides. “The wolf must be taken in hand,” said an aspiring parliamentarian,Francis Palombi, when pressed by voters in an election campaign early this summer. Touristsenjoy visiting a wolf park in Lozère, but farmers fret over their livestock and their livelihoods. .. .As early as the ninth century, the royal office of the Luparii—wolf-catchers—was created inFrance to tackle the predators. Those official hunters (and others) completed their job in the1930s, when the last wolf disappeared from the mainland. Active hunting and improvedtechnology such as rifles in the 19th century, plus the use of poison such as strychnine lateron, caused the population collapse. But in the early 1990s the animals reappeared. Theycrossed the Alps from Italy, upsetting sheep farmers on the French side of the border. Wolveshave since spread to areas such as Lozère, delighting environmentalists, who see thepredators’ presence as a sign of wider ecological health. Farmers, who say the wolves causethe deaths of thousands of sheep and other grazing animals, are less cheerful. They grumblethat green activists and politically correct urban types have allowed the return of an oldenemy.Various factors explain the changes of the past few decades. Rural depopulation is part of thestory. In Lozère, for example, farming and a once-flourishing mining industry supported apopulation of over 140,000 residents in the mid-19th century. Today the department has fewerthan 80,000 people, many in its towns. As humans withdraw, forests are expanding. InFrance, between 1990 and 2015, forest cover increased by an average of 102,000 hectareseach year, as more fields were given over to trees. Now, nearly one-third of mainland Franceis covered by woodland of some sort. The decline of hunting as a sport also means moreforests fall quiet. In the mid-to-late 20th century over 2m hunters regularly spent winterweekends tramping in woodland, seeking boars, birds and other prey. Today the FédérationNationale des Chasseurs, the national body, claims 1.1m people hold hunting licences,though the number of active hunters is probably lower. The mostly protected status of the wolfin Europe—hunting them is now forbidden, other than when occasional culls are sanctionedby the state—plus the efforts of NGOs to track and count the animals, also contribute to therecovery of wolf populations.As the lupine population of Europe spreads westwards, with occasional reports of wolvesseen closer to urban areas, expect to hear of more clashes between farmers and those whocelebrate the predators’ return. Farmers’ losses are real, but are not the only economic story.Tourist venues, such as parks where wolves are kept and the animals’ spread is discussed,also generate income and jobs in rural areas.Which one of the following has NOT contributed to the growing wolf population inLozère?

mile Durkheim, a French sociologist who rose to prominence in the late 19thand early 20thcenturies, is credited with being one of the principal founders of modern sociology. When Durkheim began writing, sociology was not recognized as an independent field of study. As part of the campaign to change this scenario, he went to great lengths to separate sociology from all other disciplines, especially philosophy.Durkheims perspective differed from other sociologists of his era as his theories were founded on things external in nature such as social facts, as opposed to those internal in nature, such as the motivations and desires of individuals. As per him, social phenomena arise when a certain reality emerges from the behavior of interacting individuals, but this same reality cannot be explained in terms of the characteristics of individual agents. For instance, he could argue that social formations such as gangs, political parties and associations are comprised of individual members, but the macro outcome resulting from such organizations operates in a different level and produces results that would not occur on an individual level. He, therefore, believed that the society was far superior to any of its individual components and could hence exert a coercive power on individuals to lead them to acceptable levels of satisfaction. His idea was that happiness and wants are tied to each other. He said, To pursue a goal which is by definition unattainable is to condemn oneself to a state of perpetual unhappiness... To achieve any other result, the passions first must be limited. But since the individual has no way of limiting them, this must be done by some force exterior to him. This exterior force of course in his opinion was the society.Which of the following is stated in the passage?

The golden toad of Costa Rica, whose beauty and rarity inspired an unusual degree of human interest from a public generally unconcerned about amphibians, may have been driven to extinction by human activity nevertheless. In the United States, a public relations campaign featuring the toad raised money to purchase and protect the toad’s habitat in Costa Rica, establishing the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in 1972. Although this action seemed to secure the toad’s future, it is now apparent that setting aside habitat was not enough to save this beautiful creature. The toad’s demise in the late 1980s was a harbinger of further species extinction in Costa Rica. Since that time, another twenty of the fifty species of frogs and toads known to once inhabit a 30 square kilometer area near Monteverde have disappeared.The unexplained, relatively sudden disappearance of amphibians in Costa Rica is not a unique story. Populations of frogs, toads, and salamanders have declined or disappeared the world over. Scientists hypothesize that the more subtle effects of human activities on the world’s ecosystems, such as the build-up of pollutants, the decrease in atmospheric ozone, and changing weather patterns due to global warming, are beginning to take their toll. Perhaps amphibians - whose permeable skin makes them sensitive to environmental changes - are the “canary in the coal mine,” giving us early notification of the deterioration of our environment. If amphibians are the biological harbingers of environmental problems, humans would be wise to heed their warning.Q.The primary purpose of the passage is to

The golden toad of Costa Rica, whose beauty and rarity inspired an unusual degree of human interest from a public generally unconcerned about amphibians, may have been driven to extinction by human activity nevertheless. In the United States, a public relations campaign featuring the toad raised money to purchase and protect the toad’s habitat in Costa Rica, establishing the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in 1972. Although this action seemed to secure the toad’s future, it is now apparent that setting aside habitat was not enough to save this beautiful creature. The toad’s demise in the late 1980s was a harbinger of further species extinction in Costa Rica. Since that time, another twenty of the fifty species of frogs and toads known to once inhabit a 30 square kilometer area near Monteverde have disappeared.The unexplained, relatively sudden disappearance of amphibians in Costa Rica is not a unique story. Populations of frogs, toads, and salamanders have declined or disappeared the world over. Scientists hypothesize that the more subtle effects of human activities on the world’s ecosystems, such as the build-up of pollutants, the decrease in atmospheric ozone, and changing weather patterns due to global warming, are beginning to take their toll. Perhaps amphibians - whose permeable skin makes them sensitive to environmental changes - are the “canary in the coal mine,” giving us early notification of the deterioration of our environment. If amphibians are the biological harbingers of environmental problems, humans would be wise to heed their warning.Q.According to the passage, all of the following are true EXCEPT

The golden toad of Costa Rica, whose beauty and rarity inspired an unusual degree of human interest from a public generally unconcerned about amphibians, may have been driven to extinction by human activity nevertheless. In the United States, a public relations campaign featuring the toad raised money to purchase and protect the toad’s habitat in Costa Rica, establishing the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in 1972. Although this action seemed to secure the toad’s future, it is now apparent that setting aside habitat was not enough to save this beautiful creature. The toad’s demise in the late 1980s was a harbinger of further species extinction in Costa Rica. Since that time, another twenty of the fifty species of frogs and toads known to once inhabit a 30 square kilometer area near Monteverde have disappeared.The unexplained, relatively sudden disappearance of amphibians in Costa Rica is not a unique story. Populations of frogs, toads, and salamanders have declined or disappeared the world over. Scientists hypothesize that the more subtle effects of human activities on the world’s ecosystems, such as the build-up of pollutants, the decrease in atmospheric ozone, and changing weather patterns due to global warming, are beginning to take their toll. Perhaps amphibians - whose permeable skin makes them sensitive to environmental changes - are the “canary in the coal mine,” giving us early notification of the deterioration of our environment. If amphibians are the biological harbingers of environmental problems, humans would be wise to heed their warning.Q.The passage implies that

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Sam: Mountain lions, a protected species, are preying on bighorn sheep, another protected species. We must let nature take its course and hope the bighorns survive.Meli: Nonsense. We must do what we can to ensure the survival of the bighorn, even if that means limiting the mountain lion population.Which one of the following is a point of disagreement between Meli and Sam?a)Humans should not intervene to protect bighorn sheep from mountain lions.b)The preservation of a species as a whole is more important than the loss of a few individuals.c)The preservation of a predatory species is easier to ensure than the preservation of the species preyed upon.d)Any measures to limit the mountain lion population would likely push the species to extinction.e)If the population of mountain lions is not limited, the bighorn sheep species will not survive.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup