GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted i... Start Learning for Free
I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?
  • a)
    Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.
  • b)
    The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.
  • c)
    The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.
  • d)
    Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.
  • e)
    The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Wint...
The conclusion of this argument is difficult to identify because the author does not use a traditional conclusion indicator. The first three sentences are admissions by the author regarding the nature of Hogan’s actions. The fourth sentence contains the conclusion and a premise, and the conclusion is that “Hogan’s actions should not be wholly condemned.” If you struggled to identify the conclusion, consider how you might have applied the Conclusion Identification Methodology to the pieces of the argument. For example, consider the two parts of the last sentence. If you thought one of them might be the conclusion, place one as the conclusion and the other as a premise, as follows: “Because I ask that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned, therefore I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.” Does that configuration sound right? No. Try again by reversing the premise and conclusion pieces: “Because Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months, therefore I ask you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned.” The relationship now sounds much more logical.
Answer choice (A): The author admits that Hogan fully realized his actions and the author asks that “Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned.” Both of these statements are counter to the idea that Hogan should not be considered responsible for Winter’s injuries.
Answer choice (B): The only reference to the robber is that Hogan mistakenly believed that Winters was the robber. Thus, there is no evidence in the stimulus to support this answer.
Answer choice (C): This correct answer is a paraphrase of the conclusion of the argument.
Answer choice (D): According to the information in the stimulus, this answer must be true. Regardless, the answer is still incorrect because it fails to summarize the author’s main point. This type of answer—one that is true but misses the main point—is frequently featured as an incorrect answer in Main Point questions.
Answer choice (E): Like answer choice (D), this statement is true according to the stimulus. But, it is incorrect because it does not capture the main point.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully realized the nature of his actions and the effects that they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is reprehensible, other things being equal. But in asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the past several months.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?a)Hogan should not be considered responsible for the injuries sustained by Winters.b)The robber who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings should be considered to be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as Hogan.c)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters are not completely blameworthy.d)Hogan thought that Winters was the person who had been terrorizing west-side apartment buildings for the last few months.e)The actions of Hogan that seriously injured Winters were reprehensible, other things being equal.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev