Mr Pratham applied for a job as principal of a school the school manag...
Mr Pratham's Suit against the School
Introduction:
Mr Pratham applied for a job as the principal of a school. One member of the school Management Committee privately informed Mr Pratham that he was appointed. However, the official communication regarding his appointment was not given by the school. Later, the management of the school decided to appoint someone else as the principal and claimed damages. In this scenario, Mr Pratham can file a suit against the school based on the following grounds:
1. Breach of Contract:
Mr Pratham can argue that there was an implied contract between him and the school when the member of the Management Committee privately informed him about his appointment. Even though the appointment was not officially communicated, Mr Pratham can claim that the school's actions amounted to a breach of contract. He can argue that he relied on the information provided by the committee member and acted in good faith, preparing for the role of the principal.
2. Promissory Estoppel:
Mr Pratham can also rely on the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Promissory estoppel prevents a party from going back on their promise if the other party has reasonably relied on that promise to their detriment. In this case, Mr Pratham can argue that he relied on the private communication of his appointment and took actions in good faith, such as resigning from his previous job or making preparations for the new role. By appointing someone else as the principal, the school's actions caused him financial and professional damages.
3. Damages:
Mr Pratham can claim damages for the loss he suffered as a result of the school's actions. He can seek compensation for the expenses incurred in preparing for the role of the principal, such as hiring professional services, relocation costs, or any other relevant expenses. Additionally, he can claim damages for the loss of income due to the termination of his previous job and the impact on his professional reputation.
Conclusion:
In the given scenario, Mr Pratham can file a suit against the school based on breach of contract and promissory estoppel. He can seek damages for the loss suffered as a result of the school's actions. It is advisable for Mr Pratham to consult with a legal professional to assess the specific circumstances and advise on the best course of action.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CA Foundation study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CA Foundation.