GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The city of Workney, in raising bus fares fro... Start Learning for Free
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.
The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?
  • a)
    Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase
  • b)
    Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.
  • c)
    The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders
  • d)
    The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system
  • e)
    Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose...
A. Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase.
This assumption suggests that the fare increase will not significantly impact the ridership of low-income residents. If they continue to ride the buses in the same numbers, it supports the feasibility of the alternative proposal.
B. Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.
This assumption implies that low-income riders are more price-sensitive and would be more inclined to take advantage of the cost-saving opportunity provided by the 9-token offer. It suggests that the alternative proposal would be beneficial specifically for low-income riders.
C. The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders.
This assumption is crucial for the alternative proposal to be a viable option for low-income riders. It suggests that the cost of purchasing 9 fare tokens for $10.00 would not impose a significant financial burden on low-income bus riders.
D. The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system.
This assumption suggests that the fare increase is necessary to generate additional revenue for the city's bus system, potentially to fund the purchase of new buses. It implies that the fare increase is justified and serves a specific purpose.
E. Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.
This assumption implies that the bus system is the primary mode of public transportation in Workney and that alternative transportation options are limited or nonexistent. It underscores the importance of addressing the fare increase issue for low-income residents who heavily rely on buses for their transportation needs.
It's important to note that while all of these assumptions play a role in evaluating the alternative proposal, the strongest assumption that directly supports the feasibility of the alternative proposal is option C.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose...
A. Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase.
This assumption suggests that the fare increase will not significantly impact the ridership of low-income residents. If they continue to ride the buses in the same numbers, it supports the feasibility of the alternative proposal.
B. Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.
This assumption implies that low-income riders are more price-sensitive and would be more inclined to take advantage of the cost-saving opportunity provided by the 9-token offer. It suggests that the alternative proposal would be beneficial specifically for low-income riders.
C. The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders.
This assumption is crucial for the alternative proposal to be a viable option for low-income riders. It suggests that the cost of purchasing 9 fare tokens for $10.00 would not impose a significant financial burden on low-income bus riders.
D. The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system.
This assumption suggests that the fare increase is necessary to generate additional revenue for the city's bus system, potentially to fund the purchase of new buses. It implies that the fare increase is justified and serves a specific purpose.
E. Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.
This assumption implies that the bus system is the primary mode of public transportation in Workney and that alternative transportation options are limited or nonexistent. It underscores the importance of addressing the fare increase issue for low-income residents who heavily rely on buses for their transportation needs.
It's important to note that while all of these assumptions play a role in evaluating the alternative proposal, the strongest assumption that directly supports the feasibility of the alternative proposal is option C.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Article 1News article in an environmental publication.July 19 – If current trends continue, fossil fuels will be exhausted by 2052. Industry and transportation and the inability of governments to put stricter emissions regulations in place means that there will be a greater demand for alternative energy sources. Additionally, recent concerns about the high-cost of implementing new systems such as public transportation in industrialized areas has led many voters to actually strike down propositions to subsidize alternative fuel research.Article 2Interview with a well-known scientist.August 3 – Dr. Lisa Goodman, one of the team of architects behind several new battery-operated commercial vehicles, has criticized the government’s unwillingness to aggressively lobby voters to pass measures to reduce fossil fuel usage. She suggests that without a significant reduction in per-person fossil fuel consumption, the rate of global warming could soon increase threefold.“I know that voters continue to reject costly measures to reduce widespread fossil fuel consumption such as large-scale public transportation projects, and that politicians are naturally going to avoid stumping for unpopular policies. However, if something isn’t done soon, by 2055, a barrel of gasoline may become a luxury that only the rich can afford.”Article 3Article from a weekly news magazine.August 29 – The price of crude oil has jumped by 500% over the last decade as a decrease in supply has met with an increased demand. This demand has encouraged many new oil wells to launch in the Gulf of Mexico, and some American environmental groups have expressed concern that certain oil companies are not following the safest procedures, emphasizing that the companies are more concerned with the speed of extraction than the well-being of the ecosystem. Some scientists in the Gulf have called for an increase in safety regulations for oil companies drilling off the coast, but the companies warn that this may dramatically increase the cost of crude oil, at a time when many Americans are already struggling to pay the increased price.Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the three articles support the inference as stated?Q.Dr. Goodman would likely support a public referendum on whether to require the oil companies to have better safety and ecological regulations.

Article 1News article in an environmental publication.July 19 – If current trends continue, fossil fuels will be exhausted by 2052. Industry and transportation and the inability of governments to put stricter emissions regulations in place means that there will be a greater demand for alternative energy sources. Additionally, recent concerns about the high-cost of implementing new systems such as public transportation in industrialized areas has led many voters to actually strike down propositions to subsidize alternative fuel research.Article 2Interview with a well-known scientist.August 3 – Dr. Lisa Goodman, one of the team of architects behind several new battery-operated commercial vehicles, has criticized the government’s unwillingness to aggressively lobby voters to pass measures to reduce fossil fuel usage. She suggests that without a significant reduction in per-person fossil fuel consumption, the rate of global warming could soon increase threefold.“I know that voters continue to reject costly measures to reduce widespread fossil fuel consumption such as large-scale public transportation projects, and that politicians are naturally going to avoid stumping for unpopular policies. However, if something isn’t done soon, by 2055, a barrel of gasoline may become a luxury that only the rich can afford.”Article 3Article from a weekly news magazine.August 29 – The price of crude oil has jumped by 500% over the last decade as a decrease in supply has met with an increased demand. This demand has encouraged many new oil wells to launch in the Gulf of Mexico, and some American environmental groups have expressed concern that certain oil companies are not following the safest procedures, emphasizing that the companies are more concerned with the speed of extraction than the well-being of the ecosystem. Some scientists in the Gulf have called for an increase in safety regulations for oil companies drilling off the coast, but the companies warn that this may dramatically increase the cost of crude oil, at a time when many Americans are already struggling to pay the increased price.Consider each of the following statement. Does the information in the three articles support the inference as stated?Q.The actions of the oil companies have led some voters to reject measuresthey consider costly.

Article 1News article in an environmental publication.July 19 – If current trends continue, fossil fuels will be exhausted by 2052. Industry and transportation and the inability of governments to put stricter emissions regulations in place means that there will be a greater demand for alternative energy sources. Additionally, recent concerns about the high-cost of implementing new systems such as public transportation in industrialized areas has led many voters to actually strike down propositions to subsidize alternative fuel research.Article 2Interview with a well-known scientist.August 3 – Dr. Lisa Goodman, one of the team of architects behind several new battery-operated commercial vehicles, has criticized the government’s unwillingness to aggressively lobby voters to pass measures to reduce fossil fuel usage. She suggests that without a significant reduction in per-person fossil fuel consumption, the rate of global warming could soon increase threefold.“I know that voters continue to reject costly measures to reduce widespread fossil fuel consumption such as large-scale public transportation projects, and that politicians are naturally going to avoid stumping for unpopular policies. However, if something isn’t done soon, by 2055, a barrel of gasoline may become a luxury that only the rich can afford.”Article 3Article from a weekly news magazine.August 29 – The price of crude oil has jumped by 500% over the last decade as a decrease in supply has met with an increased demand. This demand has encouraged many new oil wells to launch in the Gulf of Mexico, and some American environmental groups have expressed concern that certain oil companies are not following the safest procedures, emphasizing that the companies are more concerned with the speed of extraction than the well-being of the ecosystem. Some scientists in the Gulf have called for an increase in safety regulations for oil companies drilling off the coast, but the companies warn that this may dramatically increase the cost of crude oil, at a time when many Americans are already struggling to pay the increased price.Consider each of the following statement. Does the information in the three articles support the inference as stated?Q.An increase in demand for a product could incentivize companies to cut corners.

Article 1News article in an environmental publication.July 19 – If current trends continue, fossil fuels will be exhausted by 2052. Industry and transportation and the inability of governments to put stricter emissions regulations in place means that there will be a greater demand for alternative energy sources. Additionally, recent concerns about the high-cost of implementing new systems such as public transportation in industrialized areas has led many voters to actually strike down propositions to subsidize alternative fuel research.Article 2Interview with a well-known scientist.August 3 – Dr. Lisa Goodman, one of the team of architects behind several new battery-operated commercial vehicles, has criticized the government’s unwillingness to aggressively lobby voters to pass measures to reduce fossil fuel usage. She suggests that without a significant reduction in per-person fossil fuel consumption, the rate of global warming could soon increase threefold.“I know that voters continue to reject costly measures to reduce widespread fossil fuel consumption such as large-scale public transportation projects, and that politicians are naturally going to avoid stumping for unpopular policies. However, if something isn’t done soon, by 2055, a barrel of gasoline may become a luxury that only the rich can afford.”Article 3Article from a weekly news magazine.August 29 – The price of crude oil has jumped by 500% over the last decade as a decrease in supply has met with an increased demand. This demand has encouraged many new oil wells to launch in the Gulf of Mexico, and some American environmental groups have expressed concern that certain oil companies are not following the safest procedures, emphasizing that the companies are more concerned with the speed of extraction than the well-being of the ecosystem. Some scientists in the Gulf have called for an increase in safety regulations for oil companies drilling off the coast, but the companies warn that this may dramatically increase the cost of crude oil, at a time when many Americans are already struggling to pay the increased price.Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the three articles support the inference as stated?Q.Politicians usually do not agree with one another on issues of global warming and fossil fuel consumption.

Top Courses for GMAT

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the citys low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?a)Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increaseb)Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.c)The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus ridersd)The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the citys bus systeme)Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev