All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Which of the following, if true, provides the... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?
Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.
  • a)
    compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environment
  • b)
    the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several years
  • c)
    gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutants
  • d)
    measuring a car's emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that car's contribution to atmospheric pollution
  • e)
    most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphere
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion ...
The passage states that cars fueled by methanol have lower emissions of pollutants compared to gasoline-fueled cars, except for somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions. However, despite the higher formaldehyde emissions, a methanol-powered car still produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car. We need to find an answer choice that explains why this is the case.
(A) Compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environment.
This answer choice does not provide an explanation for why methanol-powered cars produce less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution.
(B) The technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several years.
This answer choice discusses the technical difficulties of mass-producing methanol-powered cars, but it does not explain why methanol-powered cars produce less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution.
(C) Gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutants.
While this answer choice provides information about catalytic converters in gasoline-powered cars, it does not explain why methanol-powered cars produce less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution.
(D) Measuring a car's emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that car's contribution to atmospheric pollution.
This answer choice discusses the accuracy of measuring car emissions, but it does not explain why methanol-powered cars produce less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution.
(E) Most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphere.
This answer choice provides a logical completion of the passage. It explains that most formaldehyde pollution from gasoline-powered cars occurs due to the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphere. Since methanol-fueled cars have lower emissions of hydrocarbons, they produce less formaldehyde pollution overall.
Therefore, the most logical completion of the passage is (E) "most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphere."
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The golden toad of Costa Rica, whose beauty and rarity inspired an unusual degree of human interest from a public generally unconcerned about amphibians, may have been driven to extinction by human activity nevertheless. In the United States, a public relations campaign featuring the toad raised money to purchase and protect the toad’s habitat in Costa Rica, establishing the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in 1972. Although this action seemed to secure the toad’s future, it is now apparent that setting aside habitat was not enough to save this beautiful creature. The toad’s demise in the late 1980s was a harbinger of further species extinction in Costa Rica. Since that time, another twenty of the fifty species of frogs and toads known to once inhabit a 30 square kilometer area near Monteverde have disappeared.The unexplained, relatively sudden disappearance of amphibians in Costa Rica is not a unique story. Populations of frogs, toads, and salamanders have declined or disappeared the world over. Scientists hypothesize that the more subtle effects of human activities on the world’s ecosystems, such as the build-up of pollutants, the decrease in atmospheric ozone, and changing weather patterns due to global warming, are beginning to take their toll. Perhaps amphibians - whose permeable skin makes them sensitive to environmental changes - are the “canary in the coal mine,” giving us early notification of the deterioration of our environment. If amphibians are the biological harbingers of environmental problems, humans would be wise to heed their warning.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that

Globally, about a third of the food produced for human consumption goes to waste, implying that a third of the water, land use, energy and financial resources that go into producing it are also squandered. Yet people often think of food as environmentally benign because it is biodegradable, while label food packaging as a wasteful use of resources leading to nothing but more pollution, despite the reality that the energy that goes into packaging makes up a mere 10% of the total energy that goes into producing, transporting, storing and preparing food. Needless to say, their view ignores the negative impact of food production, supply, and consumption, and the benefits possible from the right kind of food packaging.Indeed the dislike for food packaging is not all baseless. There is a lot of bad and wasteful packaging out there. But any assessment of its impact on the environment must take into account the benefits one can derive from packaging in the shape of reduced food waste that can be realized by protecting and dispensing food properly. For instance, two percent of the milk produced in the US goes bad on supermarket shelves before it can be purchased. This dairy waste can be avoided with packaging technology such as Tetra Pak that saves milk from spoiling, even without refrigeration. However, environmentally aware consumers tend to dislike Tetra Pak material because they think it cannot be recycled. The truth, however, is that it can be recycled, but the process is rather complicated. Irrespective of the recycling aspect, Tetra Pak is a good environmental bet because it can extend the shelf life of milk up to nine months, reducing the need for refrigeration and reducing the amount of milk that goes bad on retail shelves. Clearly, the environmental benefit of the food-protection technology outweighs the negative impact of the packaging itself.Which of the following statement can be derived from the passage?

The golden toad of Costa Rica, whose beauty and rarity inspired an unusual degree of human interest from a public generally unconcerned about amphibians, may have been driven to extinction by human activity nevertheless. In the United States, a public relations campaign featuring the toad raised money to purchase and protect the toad’s habitat in Costa Rica, establishing the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in 1972. Although this action seemed to secure the toad’s future, it is now apparent that setting aside habitat was not enough to save this beautiful creature. The toad’s demise in the late 1980s was a harbinger of further species extinction in Costa Rica. Since that time, another twenty of the fifty species of frogs and toads known to once inhabit a 30 square kilometer area near Monteverde have disappeared.The unexplained, relatively sudden disappearance of amphibians in Costa Rica is not a unique story. Populations of frogs, toads, and salamanders have declined or disappeared the world over. Scientists hypothesize that the more subtle effects of human activities on the world’s ecosystems, such as the build-up of pollutants, the decrease in atmospheric ozone, and changing weather patterns due to global warming, are beginning to take their toll. Perhaps amphibians - whose permeable skin makes them sensitive to environmental changes - are the “canary in the coal mine,” giving us early notification of the deterioration of our environment. If amphibians are the biological harbingers of environmental problems, humans would be wise to heed their warning.Q.According to the passage, all of the following are true EXCEPT

The golden toad of Costa Rica, whose beauty and rarity inspired an unusual degree of human interest from a public generally unconcerned about amphibians, may have been driven to extinction by human activity nevertheless. In the United States, a public relations campaign featuring the toad raised money to purchase and protect the toad’s habitat in Costa Rica, establishing the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in 1972. Although this action seemed to secure the toad’s future, it is now apparent that setting aside habitat was not enough to save this beautiful creature. The toad’s demise in the late 1980s was a harbinger of further species extinction in Costa Rica. Since that time, another twenty of the fifty species of frogs and toads known to once inhabit a 30 square kilometer area near Monteverde have disappeared.The unexplained, relatively sudden disappearance of amphibians in Costa Rica is not a unique story. Populations of frogs, toads, and salamanders have declined or disappeared the world over. Scientists hypothesize that the more subtle effects of human activities on the world’s ecosystems, such as the build-up of pollutants, the decrease in atmospheric ozone, and changing weather patterns due to global warming, are beginning to take their toll. Perhaps amphibians - whose permeable skin makes them sensitive to environmental changes - are the “canary in the coal mine,” giving us early notification of the deterioration of our environment. If amphibians are the biological harbingers of environmental problems, humans would be wise to heed their warning.Q.The passage implies that

Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.As urban landscapes continue to expand, the rise of vertical farming is becoming a crucial element in the quest for sustainable city living. Vertical farms, which grow crops in stacked layers within a controlled environment, offer a revolutionary approach to agriculture in urban settings. This innovative method of farming is not just about saving space; its about reimagining how we produce food in the face of growing environmental challenges.One of the key advantages of vertical farming is its minimal use of water and pesticides. Unlike traditional agriculture, which relies heavily on these resources, vertical farms use hydroponic systems that circulate water efficiently and eliminate the need for soil and large-scale pesticide use. This approach significantly reduces the environmental impact of farming.Another significant benefit is the reduction in food miles. Vertical farms can be established within urban areas, drastically cutting down the distance food travels from farm to consumer. This not only ensures fresher produce but also reduces transportation emissions, contributing to lower carbon footprints.However, vertical farming faces its own set of challenges. The initial setup and operational costs can be high, making it difficult for these farms to compete with traditional agriculture in terms of cost. Additionally, the energy requirements for maintaining controlled environments, such as lighting and temperature control, are substantial. Critics argue that unless renewable energy sources power these farms, they may not be as sustainable as they seem.Despite these challenges, the potential of vertical farming in reshaping urban agriculture remains immense. As technology advances, the efficiency of these farms is expected to improve, making them a vital component in the development of sustainable cities.Q.Based on the passage, which of the following can be inferred about vertical farms compared to traditional farms?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which of the following, if true, provides the most logical completion of the passage below?Cars fueled by methanol have a much lower level of emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide and environmentally harmful hydrocarbons than gasoline-fueled cars do. Methanol fuel does produce somewhat higher formaldehyde emissions than gasoline does. Nevertheless, a methanol-powered car actually produces less atmospheric formaldehyde pollution than a comparable gasoline-powered car, because _______.a)compared to carbon monoxide and some hydrocarbons produced by gasoline-powered cars, formaldehyde pollution is not a serious threat to the environmentb)the technical difficulties involved in mass-producing methanol-powered cars will prevent them from seriously competing with gasoline-powered cars for several yearsc)gasoline-powered cars are required by United States law to be equipped with catalytic converters that reduce emissions of many pollutantsd)measuring a cars emissions is generally an accurate method of assessing that cars contribution to atmospheric pollutione)most formaldehyde pollution generated by gasoline-powered cars results from the photochemical conversion of hydrocarbon emissions into formaldehyde in the atmosphereCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup