All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Which of the following most logically complet... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valley's primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .
  • a)
    the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screws
  • b)
    an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levels
  • c)
    the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalent
  • d)
    aluminum screws can only be used for certain products
  • e)
    producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titanium
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nes...
The argument states that Nessus Valley Machinery is deciding between manufacturing screws out of steel or aluminum. The costs of production and selling prices are comparable for both types of screws. However, due to one of their primary customers discontinuing the use of steel screws in their trucks, the market for steel screws will be significantly smaller than usual, while the market for aluminum screws will remain unaffected.
The argument then concludes that producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel. To complete the argument, we need to provide a reason that supports this conclusion.
Let's analyze the answer choices:
(A) The smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screws.
This answer choice directly addresses the profitability aspect of the argument. It states that the smaller market for steel screws will not be compensated by a higher sales price for steel screws. This implies that the reduced demand for steel screws will not result in increased profitability, strengthening the case for producing aluminum screws instead.
(B) An additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levels.
This answer choice suggests planning an additional production run of steel screws for when the market for them returns to normal levels. While this may be a valid strategy for future operations, it does not directly support the claim that producing aluminum screws will be more profitable in the current situation. Therefore, it is not the most logical completion of the argument.
(C) The steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalent.
This answer choice introduces a new point about the superiority of steel screws for use in trucks compared to aluminum screws. However, this does not directly address the profitability aspect of the argument. The argument is concerned with profitability, not the comparative quality of the screws. Therefore, this answer choice is not the most logical completion of the argument.
(D) Aluminum screws can only be used for certain products.
This answer choice introduces a limitation to the usability of aluminum screws, stating that they can only be used for certain products. While this may be a relevant consideration for the overall product line, it does not provide a direct reason why producing aluminum screws would be more profitable than producing steel screws in the current market situation. Therefore, it is not the most logical completion of the argument.
(E) Producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titanium.
This answer choice introduces a comparison between aluminum screws and screws made from other types of metal, such as titanium. While this may be interesting information, the argument is specifically focused on deciding between steel and aluminum screws. Therefore, this answer choice is not the most logical completion of the argument.
Based on the analysis above, answer choice (A) is the most logical completion of the argument. It directly addresses the profitability aspect by stating that the reduced demand for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price, strengthening the case for producing aluminum screws instead.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.It can be inferred from the passage that application of "other mandates" (see highlighted text) would be unlikely to result in an outcome satisfactory to the female employees in which of the following situations?I. Males employed as long-distance truck drivers for a furniture company make $3.50 more per hour than do females with comparable job experience employed in the same capacity.II. Women working in the office of a cement company contend that their jobs are as demanding and valuable as those of the men working in the cement factory, but the women are paid much less per hour.III. A law firm employs both male and female paralegals with the same educational and career backgrounds, but the starting salary for male paralegals is $5,000 more than for female paralegals.

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.Which of the following best describes an application of the principles of comparable worth as they are described in the passage?

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.According to the passage, comparable worth principles are different in which of the following ways from other mandates intended to reduce or eliminate pay inequities

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Nessus Valley Machinery is trying to decide between manufacturing screws out of steel or screws out of aluminum. Both types of screw typically cost about the same to produce and they sell at comparable prices. Because one of Nessus Valleys primary customers, an automotive company, is discontinuing the truck they produce that uses steel screws, the market for steel screws, though not for aluminum screws, will be significantly smaller than usual. Therefore, producing screws from aluminum will be more profitable than producing screws from steel, because __________ .a)the smaller-than-usual customer base for steel screws will not be offset by a higher sales price for steel screwsb)an additional production run of steel screws should be planned for when the market returns to normal levelsc)the steel screws Nessus Valley produces are better for use in trucks than their aluminum equivalentd)aluminum screws can only be used for certain productse)producing aluminum screws is more profitable than producing screws from other types of metal, such as titaniumCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup