GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > While proponents argue about the benefits of ...
Start Learning for Free
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.
Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?
- a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?
- b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?
- c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?
- d)What is the national average of children with autism ?
- e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,...
The argument claims that there is hardly any concrete data to support the benefits of vaccination for children. It further suggests that the efficacy of vaccines is questionable and that vaccines may cause illnesses such as autism. Finally, it presents statistical data comparing the probability of vaccinated children getting diseases versus the national average of all children.
To evaluate the argument effectively, we need to focus on the key aspects and potential flaws in the reasoning. Let's examine each option to see which one addresses these concerns:
(A) What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?
This option is the most relevant because it helps determine the vaccination rate in the country. The argument assumes that there is a significant number of children who have not been vaccinated, which could impact the effectiveness of vaccines. Understanding the ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated children provides important context to assess the argument's claims.
(B) What number of children are vaccinated in the country?
While the number of vaccinated children is important information, it alone does not provide enough context to evaluate the argument. The argument is more concerned with the effectiveness of vaccination rather than the absolute number of vaccinated children.
(C) What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?
This information is relevant to understanding the overall accessibility of vaccination and healthcare, but it doesn't directly address the argument's claims about vaccine efficacy and potential adverse effects such as autism.
(D) What is the national average of children with autism?
Although the argument mentions the possibility of vaccines causing autism, directly evaluating the national average of children with autism does not address the core claim that vaccines cause the condition. The question of whether vaccines are linked to autism requires specific studies and scientific evidence to assess, rather than relying on national averages.
(E) What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?
This option is certainly important in evaluating the argument since it directly addresses the concern regarding vaccine efficacy. However, it is less comprehensive than option A, as it only focuses on the measurement method without providing broader context or data.
In summary, option (A) is the most appropriate choice for evaluating the given argument because it directly addresses the vaccination rate by comparing the number of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Understanding this ratio will help assess the argument's claims about the effectiveness of vaccines.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all GMAT courses
Most Upvoted Answer
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,...
Analysis of Option A:
Ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated children:
- This option is the most relevant because it directly addresses the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated children in the country.
- It will help evaluate the argument by providing insights into the proportion of children who are vaccinated versus those who are not, which can impact the overall effectiveness of vaccination programs.
- By understanding this ratio, it can be determined if there are significant differences in disease incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, thereby shedding light on the efficacy of vaccination.
Other Options:
- Option B: While the number of vaccinated children is important, it may not directly address the effectiveness of vaccination compared to unvaccinated children.
- Option C: Access to vaccination and healthcare is crucial, but it may not provide direct evidence of the impact of vaccination on disease prevention.
- Option D: The national average of children with autism is not directly related to the efficacy of vaccines in preventing diseases.
- Option E: Understanding the method used to measure vaccine efficacy is important, but the ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated children provides more direct evidence for evaluating the argument.
Ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated children:
- This option is the most relevant because it directly addresses the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated children in the country.
- It will help evaluate the argument by providing insights into the proportion of children who are vaccinated versus those who are not, which can impact the overall effectiveness of vaccination programs.
- By understanding this ratio, it can be determined if there are significant differences in disease incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, thereby shedding light on the efficacy of vaccination.
Other Options:
- Option B: While the number of vaccinated children is important, it may not directly address the effectiveness of vaccination compared to unvaccinated children.
- Option C: Access to vaccination and healthcare is crucial, but it may not provide direct evidence of the impact of vaccination on disease prevention.
- Option D: The national average of children with autism is not directly related to the efficacy of vaccines in preventing diseases.
- Option E: Understanding the method used to measure vaccine efficacy is important, but the ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated children provides more direct evidence for evaluating the argument.
Community Answer
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,...
The argument claims that there is hardly any concrete data to support the benefits of vaccination for children. It further suggests that the efficacy of vaccines is questionable and that vaccines may cause illnesses such as autism. Finally, it presents statistical data comparing the probability of vaccinated children getting diseases versus the national average of all children.
To evaluate the argument effectively, we need to focus on the key aspects and potential flaws in the reasoning. Let's examine each option to see which one addresses these concerns:
(A) What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?
This option is the most relevant because it helps determine the vaccination rate in the country. The argument assumes that there is a significant number of children who have not been vaccinated, which could impact the effectiveness of vaccines. Understanding the ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated children provides important context to assess the argument's claims.
(B) What number of children are vaccinated in the country?
While the number of vaccinated children is important information, it alone does not provide enough context to evaluate the argument. The argument is more concerned with the effectiveness of vaccination rather than the absolute number of vaccinated children.
(C) What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?
This information is relevant to understanding the overall accessibility of vaccination and healthcare, but it doesn't directly address the argument's claims about vaccine efficacy and potential adverse effects such as autism.
(D) What is the national average of children with autism?
Although the argument mentions the possibility of vaccines causing autism, directly evaluating the national average of children with autism does not address the core claim that vaccines cause the condition. The question of whether vaccines are linked to autism requires specific studies and scientific evidence to assess, rather than relying on national averages.
(E) What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?
This option is certainly important in evaluating the argument since it directly addresses the concern regarding vaccine efficacy. However, it is less comprehensive than option A, as it only focuses on the measurement method without providing broader context or data.
In summary, option (A) is the most appropriate choice for evaluating the given argument because it directly addresses the vaccination rate by comparing the number of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Understanding this ratio will help assess the argument's claims about the effectiveness of vaccines.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.8% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the national average of all the children who get the disease, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.85%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.Which of the following options would help the most to evaluate the given argument?a)What is the ratio of the number of children who are not vaccinated to the number of children who are vaccinated in the country?b)What number of children are vaccinated in the country?c)What percentage of children have access to vaccination and healthcare?d)What is the national average of children with autism ?e)What is the method used to measure the efficacy of vaccines?Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup