Good evaluation of written material should not be based ona)linguistic...
The aim of good evaluation of written material is to help teachers to plan, write, produce, and evaluate materials that will help students to learn. These materials range from single-page handouts which are used in lessons, through to complete manuals which health workers use to help them in their jobs. Hence, good evaluation of written material should be based on linguistic expression, logical presentation and ability to reproduce whatever is read.
Good evaluation of written material should not be based ona)linguistic...
Explanation:
Evaluation of written material refers to the process of assessing the quality and effectiveness of a piece of writing. It involves analyzing various aspects of the written material to determine its strengths and weaknesses.
Linguistic expression:
Linguistic expression refers to the use of language, including grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure, and style. While linguistic expression is an important aspect of written material, it should not be the sole basis for evaluation. A well-written piece may have excellent linguistic expression, but it may still lack logical coherence or comprehension of the subject matter.
Logical presentation:
Logical presentation refers to the organization and structure of ideas in a written piece. It includes the use of clear and coherent arguments, logical flow, and effective transitions. Evaluating written material based on logical presentation is crucial as it ensures that the ideas are presented in a logical and coherent manner. Therefore, logical presentation should be considered when evaluating written material.
Comprehension of subject:
Comprehension of the subject matter is an essential aspect of evaluating written material. It refers to the author's understanding and knowledge of the topic being discussed. A well-comprehended piece of writing demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject matter and provides accurate and relevant information. Therefore, comprehension of the subject should be considered when evaluating written material.
Ability to reproduce whatever is read:
The ability to reproduce whatever is read refers to the memorization and regurgitation of information without necessarily understanding it. While this might be useful for certain purposes, such as exams or rote learning, it should not be the basis for evaluating written material. Evaluation should focus on the author's ability to critically analyze information, provide original insights, and present ideas in a coherent and logical manner.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, good evaluation of written material should not solely be based on linguistic expression or the ability to reproduce information. Instead, it should consider the logical presentation of ideas and the author's comprehension of the subject matter. By assessing these aspects, one can effectively evaluate the quality and effectiveness of a piece of writing.