Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding andldquo;purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamicsandrdquo;. Highlighting Indiaandrsquo;s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared andldquo;lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said andldquo;For years Indiaandrsquo;s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged Indiaandrsquo;s standing.Q.andldquo;For years Indiaandrsquo;s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged Indiaandrsquo;s standing.andquot;The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

UGC NET Exam > UGC NET Questions > Direction: Read the passage carefully and ans...

Join the Discussion on the App

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.
If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.
Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.

Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."
The above statement was given by:

a)
Subhramanyam Swami
b)
Subhramanyam Jaishankar
c)
Ravi Shankar
d)
K. Subhramanyam

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

UGC NET Paper 1 Practice Test - 6

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following questio...

From the line given in the passage: Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."

Answered by JKL Classes · View profile

Attention UGC NET Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UGC NET study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UGC NET.

UGC NET Mock Test Series 2024

UGC NET Past Year Papers

Crash Course for UGC NET Education

Mathematical Reasoning and Aptitude for UGC NET

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for UGC NET exam

Similar UGC NET Doubts

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q. Years back conflict of India with China was

View answer

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q. RCEP stands for

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the question.If India has to develop her internal strengths, the nation has to focus on the technological imperatives, keeping in mind three dynamic dimensions: the people, the overall economy and the strategic interests. These technological imperatives also take into account a ‘fourth’ dimension, time, an offshoot of modern-day dynamism in business, trade, and technology that leads to continually shifting targets. We believe that technological strengths are especially crucial in dealing with this fourth dimension underlying continuous change in the aspirations of the people, the economy in the global context, and the strategic interests. The progress of technology lies at the heart of human history. Technological strengths are the key to creating more productive employment in an increasingly competitive market place and to continually upgrade human skills. Without a pervasive use of technologies, we cannot achieve the overall development of our people in the years to come. The direct linkages of technology to the nation’s strategic strengths are becoming more and more clear, especially since the 1990s. India’s own strength in a number of core areas still puts it in a position of reasonable strength in the geopolitical context. Any nation aspiring to become a developed one needs to have strengths in various strategic technologies and also the ability to continually upgrade them through its own creative strengths. For people-oriented actions as well, whether for the creation of large scale productive employment or for ensuring nutritional and health security for people or for better living conditions, technology is the only vital input. The absence of greater technological impetus could lead to lower productivity and wastage of precious natural resources. Activities with low productivity or low-value addition, in the final analysis, hurt the poorest most. The technological imperatives to lift our people to a new life, and to life, they are entitled to be important. India, aspiring to become a major economic power in terms of trade and increase in GDP, cannot succeed on the strength of turnkey projects designed and built abroad or only through large-scale imports of plant machinery, equipment and know-how. Even while being alive to the short-term realities, medium and long-term strategies to develop core technological strengths within our industry are vital for envisioning a developed India.Q.According to the above passage, which of the following are indicative of the fourth dimension?1) Aspirations of people2) Modern day dynamism3) Economy in the global context4) Strategic interestsCode

View answer

Direction: Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow.Early feminist theory had emphasised the commonalities of womens oppression, neglecting profound differences between women in terms of class, age, religion, race and nation. As its exclusionary nature became evident, the collective we of feminism was called into question. The inadequacies of feminist theorising that conflated the condition of white, middle class women with the condition of all women were highlighted in North America by black and Latin feminists, and in Britain by black and Asian feminists. Such critiques evoked the concepts of interlocking identities and interlocking oppressions. Related and more radical analyses came from feminist scholars in the Third world, where quite different agendas were called for. These critiques heightened the irrelevance of western feminisms analytical frameworks to the lives of most women around the world and attempted to reposition feminist debate within broader social, economic and cultural contexts of analysis advocated by scholars such as Janus. Such critiques spoke from a postcolonial position, in which the selfassumed authority of western feminists to speak about or indeed for others was disputed and decentered. Influential accounts of the tendencies of masculinist imperialist ideological formation to construct a monolithic Third world woman, discursively constituted as the universal victim of Third world patriarchy, challenged feminists to "unlearn" their privilege and to deconstruct their own authority as intellectuals. These positions appeared to question the legitimacy of outside intervention of any kind, whether intellectual or political. Although subsequently attempted by the Third world scholars anxious to move beyond standpoints that threatened to mark all feminist politics as either inauthentic or unnecessary, they were enduringly influential in highlighting the questions identity and authority in feminist studies.Q. The early feminist theory ignored among women, the issue of

View answer

The "Sublime Savage" portrayal of indigenous peoples in colonial texts

View answer

Top Courses for UGC NETView all

UGC NET Mock Test Series 2024

UGC NET Past Year Papers

Crash Course for UGC NET Education

Mathematical Reasoning and Aptitude for UGC NET

Teaching Aptitude for Teaching Exam

Top Courses for UGC NET

View all

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2024 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.

Explore Courses for UGC NET exam