Question Description
Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2024 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the following question.If the world is different today, we need to think, talk and engage accordingly. Falling back is unlikely to help, he said adding “purposeful pursuit of national interest is shifting global dynamics”. Highlighting India’s new approach in dealing with terrorism he compared “lack of response to the terror attack in Mumbai in comparison to the way the country responded to the Uri and Pulwama strikes. On India walking away from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the external affair minister said no agreement was better than having a bad agreement.Giving a historical perspective to geopolitical issues, Jai-Shankar said “For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing.Q.“For years India’s position on the world state seemed assured but the 1962 conflict with China significantly damaged India’s standing."The above statement was given by:a)Subhramanyam Swamib)Subhramanyam Jaishankarc)Ravi Shankard)K. SubhramanyamCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.