All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
SAT Exam  >  SAT Questions  >  Directions:Each passage below is accompanied ... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.
Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.
After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.
Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.
Question based on the following passage.
The Evolution of Slow Food
In 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.
For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goat ingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.
During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slow pleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.
Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.
Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.
Q. (9)
  • a)
    No change
  • b)
    portrayed
  • c)
    drew
  • d)
    sketched
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your SAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions....
Choice C is the best answer. “Drew criticism” is an idiomatic phrase meaning “caused criticism to flow forth,” which fits in the context of the sentence.
Choices A, B, and D are incorrect. All contain synonyms for “drew,” but they refer to drawing as an artistic exercise. None of these choices works, within the context of the sentence, since drawing here means enticing or attracting.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Similar SAT Doubts

Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (8)

Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (11)

Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (2)

Question are based on the following passages and supplementary material.Passage 1 is from F. J. Medina, “How to Talk about Sustainability." ©2015 College Hill Coaching. Passage 2 is adapted from an essay published in 2005 about the economic analysis of environmental decisions.Passage 1Many proponents of recycling assume thatrecycling industrial, domestic, and commercialmaterials does less harm to the environment thandoes extracting new raw materials. Opponents, on(5) the other hand, scrutinize the costs of recycling,arguing that recycling programs often waste moremoney than they save, and that companies canoften produce new products more cheaply thanthey can recycle old ones. The discussion usually(10) devolves into a political battle between theenemies of the economy and the enemies of theenvironment.This demonization serves the debaters(and their fundraisers) but not the debate.(15) Environmentalists are not all ignorant anarchists,and opponents of recycling are not all rapaciousblowhards. For real solutions, we must soberlycompare the many costs and benefits of recyclingwith the many costs and benefits of disposal, as(20) if we are all stewards of both the earth and theeconomy.We must examine the full life cycles ofvarious materials, and the broad effects thesecycles have on both the environment and(25) economy. When debating the cost of a newroad, for instance, it is not enough to simplyconsider the cost of the labor or the provenanceof the materials. We must ask, what naturalbenefits, like water filtration and animal and(30) plant habitats, are being lost in the construction?Where will the road materials be in a hundredyears, and what will they be doing? What kindsof industries will the road construction andmaintenance support? How will the extra traffic(35) affect air and noise quality, or safety? Is the roadmade of local or imported materials? Are anymaterials being imported from countries withirresponsible labor or environmental practices?Is the contractor chosen through a fair and open(40) bidding process? How might the road surfaceaffect the life span or efficiency of the cars drivingon it? What will be the annual maintenance cost,financially and environmentally?Appreciating opposing viewpoints can lead(45) to important insights. Perhaps nature can doa more efficient and safer job of reusing wastematter than a recycling plant can. Perhaps aneconomic system that accounts for environmentalcosts and benefits will lead to a higher standard(50) of living for the average citizen. Perhaps insertingsome natural resources into a responsible“industrial cycle” is better for the environmentthan conserving those resources. Exploring suchpossibilities openly and respectfully will lead us(55) more reliably to both a healthier economy and ahealthier environment.Passage 2When trying to quantify the costs andbenefits of preserving our natural ecosystems,one difficulty lies in the diffuseness of these(60) effects. Economists have a relatively easy timewith commerce, because money and goods canbe tracked through a series of point-to-pointexchanges. When you pay for something, theexchange of money makes the accounting simple.(65) The diffuse, unchosen costs and benefits thataffect all of us daily—annoying commercials or abeautiful sunset, for instance—are much harderto evaluate.The benefits that ecosystems provide, like(70) biodiversity, the filtration of groundwater, themaintenance of the oxygen and nitrogen cycles,and climate stability, however, are not bought-and-sold commodities. Without them our liveswould deteriorate dramatically, but they are(75) not part of a clear exchange, so they fall into theclass of benefits and costs that economists call“externalities.”The “good feeling” that many people haveabout recycling and maintaining environmental(80) quality is just such an externality. Antienvironmentalists often ridicule such feelingsas unquantifiable, but their value is real: somestock funds only invest in companies with goodenvironmental records, and environmental(85) litigation can have steep costs in terms of moneyand goodwill.Robert Costanza, formerly of the Centerfor Environmental Science at the Universityof Maryland, has attempted to quantify these(90) “external” ecological benefits by tallying thecost to replace natures services. Imagine, forinstance, paving over the Florida Everglades andthen building systems to restore its lost benefits,such as gas conversion and sequestering,(95) food production, water filtration, and weatherregulation. How much would it cost to keep thesesystems running? Not even accounting for someof the most important externalities, like naturalbeauty, the cost would be extraordinarily high.(100) Costanza places it “conservatively” at $33 trilliondollars annually, far more than the economicoutput of all of the countries in the world.Some object to Costanzas cost analysis.Environmentalists argue that we cannot possibly(105) put a price on the smell of heather and a coolbreeze, while industrialists argue that the taskis speculative, unreliable, and an impedimentto economic progress. Nevertheless, Costanzaswork is among the most cited in the fields of(110) environmental science and economics. Forany flaws it might have, his work is giving acommon vocabulary to industrialists andenvironmentalists alike, which we must do ifwe are to coordinate intelligent environmental(115) policy with responsible economic policy.Q.Passage 2 compares the viewpoints of “environmentalists” and “industrialists” primarily to point out that

Question are based on the following passages and supplementary material.Passage 1 is from F. J. Medina, “How to Talk about Sustainability." ©2015 College Hill Coaching. Passage 2 is adapted from an essay published in 2005 about the economic analysis of environmental decisions.Passage 1Many proponents of recycling assume thatrecycling industrial, domestic, and commercialmaterials does less harm to the environment thandoes extracting new raw materials. Opponents, on(5) the other hand, scrutinize the costs of recycling,arguing that recycling programs often waste moremoney than they save, and that companies canoften produce new products more cheaply thanthey can recycle old ones. The discussion usually(10) devolves into a political battle between theenemies of the economy and the enemies of theenvironment.This demonization serves the debaters(and their fundraisers) but not the debate.(15) Environmentalists are not all ignorant anarchists,and opponents of recycling are not all rapaciousblowhards. For real solutions, we must soberlycompare the many costs and benefits of recyclingwith the many costs and benefits of disposal, as(20) if we are all stewards of both the earth and theeconomy.We must examine the full life cycles ofvarious materials, and the broad effects thesecycles have on both the environment and(25) economy. When debating the cost of a newroad, for instance, it is not enough to simplyconsider the cost of the labor or the provenanceof the materials. We must ask, what naturalbenefits, like water filtration and animal and(30) plant habitats, are being lost in the construction?Where will the road materials be in a hundredyears, and what will they be doing? What kindsof industries will the road construction andmaintenance support? How will the extra traffic(35) affect air and noise quality, or safety? Is the roadmade of local or imported materials? Are anymaterials being imported from countries withirresponsible labor or environmental practices?Is the contractor chosen through a fair and open(40) bidding process? How might the road surfaceaffect the life span or efficiency of the cars drivingon it? What will be the annual maintenance cost,financially and environmentally?Appreciating opposing viewpoints can lead(45) to important insights. Perhaps nature can doa more efficient and safer job of reusing wastematter than a recycling plant can. Perhaps aneconomic system that accounts for environmentalcosts and benefits will lead to a higher standard(50) of living for the average citizen. Perhaps insertingsome natural resources into a responsible“industrial cycle” is better for the environmentthan conserving those resources. Exploring suchpossibilities openly and respectfully will lead us(55) more reliably to both a healthier economy and ahealthier environment.Passage 2When trying to quantify the costs andbenefits of preserving our natural ecosystems,one difficulty lies in the diffuseness of these(60) effects. Economists have a relatively easy timewith commerce, because money and goods canbe tracked through a series of point-to-pointexchanges. When you pay for something, theexchange of money makes the accounting simple.(65) The diffuse, unchosen costs and benefits thataffect all of us daily—annoying commercials or abeautiful sunset, for instance—are much harderto evaluate.The benefits that ecosystems provide, like(70) biodiversity, the filtration of groundwater, themaintenance of the oxygen and nitrogen cycles,and climate stability, however, are not bought-and-sold commodities. Without them our liveswould deteriorate dramatically, but they are(75) not part of a clear exchange, so they fall into theclass of benefits and costs that economists call“externalities.”The “good feeling” that many people haveabout recycling and maintaining environmental(80) quality is just such an externality. Antienvironmentalists often ridicule such feelingsas unquantifiable, but their value is real: somestock funds only invest in companies with goodenvironmental records, and environmental(85) litigation can have steep costs in terms of moneyand goodwill.Robert Costanza, formerly of the Centerfor Environmental Science at the Universityof Maryland, has attempted to quantify these(90) “external” ecological benefits by tallying thecost to replace natures services. Imagine, forinstance, paving over the Florida Everglades andthen building systems to restore its lost benefits,such as gas conversion and sequestering,(95) food production, water filtration, and weatherregulation. How much would it cost to keep thesesystems running? Not even accounting for someof the most important externalities, like naturalbeauty, the cost would be extraordinarily high.(100) Costanza places it “conservatively” at $33 trilliondollars annually, far more than the economicoutput of all of the countries in the world.Some object to Costanzas cost analysis.Environmentalists argue that we cannot possibly(105) put a price on the smell of heather and a coolbreeze, while industrialists argue that the taskis speculative, unreliable, and an impedimentto economic progress. Nevertheless, Costanzaswork is among the most cited in the fields of(110) environmental science and economics. Forany flaws it might have, his work is giving acommon vocabulary to industrialists andenvironmentalists alike, which we must do ifwe are to coordinate intelligent environmental(115) policy with responsible economic policy.Q.The diagram provides information most relevant to

Top Courses for SATView all

Top Courses for SAT

Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for SAT 2025 is part of SAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:Each passage below is accompanied by a number of questions. For some questions, you will consider how the passage might be revised to improve the expression of ideas. For other questions, you will consider how the passage might be edited to correct errors in sentence structure, usage, or punctuation. A passage or a question may be accompanied by one or more graphics (such as a table or graph) that you will consider as you make revising and editing decisions.Some questions will direct you to an underlined portion of a passage. Other questions will direct you to a location in a passage or ask you to think about the passage as a whole.After reading each passage, choose the answer to each question that most effectively improves the quality of writing in the passage or that makes the passage conform to the conventions of standard written English. Many questions include a “NO CHANGE” option.Choose that option if you think the best choice is to leave the relevant portion of the passage as it is.Question based on the following passage.The Evolution of Slow FoodIn 1986, McDonald’s caused a stir in Italy when it opened a restaurant next to Rome’s historic Spanish Steps. Young, on-the-go eaters were thrilled; (1) specifically, those who prized regional foods and Italy’s convivial culture built on cooking and long meals feared that the restaurant signaled the death of a way of life. To counter the rise of fast food and fast (2) life, a cohort of chefs, journalists, and sociologists spearheaded a Slow Food movement, declaring loyalty to unhurried enjoyment. (3) From its beginning, the movement (4) had opposed the standardization of taste that fast food chains promote.For example, a McDonald’s hamburger made in Boston tastes more or less the same as one made in Beijing. This consistency is made possible by industrial mass production. Slow Food supporters, by contrast, back methods of growing and preparing food based on regional culinary traditions. When produced using traditional methods, goat cheese made in France tastes different from goat cheese made in Vermont. A goatingests the vegetation particular to the meadow in which it grazes, which, along with other environmental (5) factors such as altitude and weather shapes the cheese’s taste and texture. If all foods were produced under the industrial model, (6) we would have meals that are not very flavorful.During (7) their early years, the movement also focused on the value of (8) spending lots of time with friends and family during long meals. It emphasized the importance of preserving these “easygoing, slowpleasures.” As the movement grew beyond Italy’s borders—today Slow Food International boasts more than 100,000 members in 150 countries—this emphasis on pleasure (9) pictured criticism for being elitist. Critics have also asked if growing food using traditional methods, as opposed to mass production, (10) can adequately and affordably feed the world? Given the hectic pace of modern life, who among us has the time and resources for elaborate meals? Such questions, in addition to environmental concerns, are at the heart of perennial debates about food production.Over time, Slow Food has broadened its mission to focus on food that is good, clean, and fair for all.Members assert that food should be flavorful, carrying the properties of a particular region; it should be raised using environmentally sustainable practices that preserve biodiversity; and it should be accessible to all without exploiting the labors of those who produced it. (11) In short, Slow Food runs programs that support small-scale producers in marketing regional foods in a world where food corporations threaten to drive them out of the marketplace and homogenize food choices.Q. (9)a)No changeb)portrayedc)drewd)sketchedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SAT tests.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Top Courses for SAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup