CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  I have just 9 months of experience at a priva... Start Learning for Free
I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher?
Most Upvoted Answer
I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employm...
Should I show my 9 months of experience at a private bank or fill the CAT form as a fresher?

1. Consider your goals and career aspirations
- Evaluate your long-term career goals and aspirations before deciding whether to include your 9 months of experience or apply as a fresher.
- Consider how relevant your experience in the private bank is to your desired field or specialization in management.

2. Assess the impact of breaking the employment bond
- Breaking an employment bond may have legal implications and can affect your professional reputation.
- Evaluate the potential consequences of including this experience in your application.

3. Analyze the relevance of your experience
- Examine the nature of your work experience at the private bank and determine its relevance to the management field.
- If your experience involved tasks and responsibilities that align with the skills required for CAT, it may be beneficial to include this experience.

4. Review the CAT eligibility criteria
- Check the eligibility criteria specified by the CAT exam conducting body.
- Determine if including your 9 months of experience makes you eligible to apply under the work experience category.

5. Weigh the pros and cons
- Consider the advantages and disadvantages of including your 9 months of experience.
- Advantages: Demonstrating work experience can enhance your application and provide a valuable perspective during the selection process.
- Disadvantages: Breaking an employment bond may raise questions about your commitment and reliability.

6. Seek advice from mentors or professionals
- Consult with mentors, career counselors, or professionals in the management field to gain insights and guidance.
- They can provide valuable advice based on their expertise and experience.

Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision of whether to include your 9 months of experience at the private bank or apply as a fresher depends on various factors such as your career goals, relevance of the experience, eligibility criteria, and potential consequences of breaking the employment bond. Consider seeking advice from professionals and carefully evaluate the pros and cons before making a decision.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the passage carefully and answer within the context.There are two major systems of criminal procedure in the modern world—the adversarial and the inquisitorial. Both systems were historically preceded by the system of private vengeance in which the victim of a crime fashioned a remedy and administered it privately, either personally or through an agent.The modern adversarial system is only one historical step removed from the private vengeance system and still retains some of its characteristic features. For example, even though the right to initiate legal action against a criminal has now been extended to all members of society (as represented by the office of the public prosecutor), and even though the police department has effectively assumed the pretrial investigative functions on behalf of the prosecution, the adversarial system still leaves the defendant to conduct his or her own pretrial investigation. The trial is viewed as a forensic duel between two adversaries, presided over by a judge who, at the start, has no knowledge of the investigative background of the case. In the final analysis the adversarial system of criminal procedure symbolizes and regularizes punitive combat.By contrast, the inquisitorial system begins historically where the adversarial system stopped its development. It is two historical steps removed from the system of private vengeance.From the standpoint of legal anthropology, then, it is historically superior to the adversarial system. Under the inquisitorial system, the public prosecutor has the duty to investigate not just on behalf of society but also on behalf of the defendant. Additionally, the public prosecutor has the duty to present the court not only evidence that would convict the defendant, but also evidence that could prove the defendant’s innocence. The system mandates that both parties permit full pretrial discovery of the evidence in their possession. Finally, an aspect of the system that makes the trial less like a duel between two adversarial parties is that the inquisitorial system mandates that the judge take an active part in the conduct of the trial, with a role that is both directive and protective. Fact-finding is at the heart of the inquisitorial system. This system operates on the philosophical premise that in a criminal action the crucial factor is the body of facts, not the legal rule (in contrast to the adversarial system), and the goal of the entire procedure is to attempt to recreate, in the mind of the court, the commission of the alleged crime.Because of the inquisitorial system’s thoroughness in conducting its pretrial investigation, it can be concluded that, if given the choice, a defendant who is innocent would prefer to be tried under the inquisitorial system, whereas a defendant who is guilty would prefer to be tried under the adversarial system.Q.According to the passage, a central distinction between the system of private vengeance and the two modern criminal procedure systems was the shift in responsibility for initiating legal action against a criminal from the

Read the passage carefully and answer within the context.There are two major systems of criminal procedure in the modern world—the adversarial and the inquisitorial. Both systems were historically preceded by the system of private vengeance in which the victim of a crime fashioned a remedy and administered it privately, either personally or through an agent.The modern adversarial system is only one historical step removed from the private vengeance system and still retains some of its characteristic features. For example, even though the right to initiate legal action against a criminal has now been extended to all members of society (as represented by the office of the public prosecutor), and even though the police department has effectively assumed the pretrial investigative functions on behalf of the prosecution, the adversarial system still leaves the defendant to conduct his or her own pretrial investigation. The trial is viewed as a forensic duel between two adversaries, presided over by a judge who, at the start, has no knowledge of the investigative background of the case. In the final analysis the adversarial system of criminal procedure symbolizes and regularizes punitive combat.By contrast, the inquisitorial system begins historically where the adversarial system stopped its development. It is two historical steps removed from the system of private vengeance.From the standpoint of legal anthropology, then, it is historically superior to the adversarial system. Under the inquisitorial system, the public prosecutor has the duty to investigate not just on behalf of society but also on behalf of the defendant. Additionally, the public prosecutor has the duty to present the court not only evidence that would convict the defendant, but also evidence that could prove the defendant’s innocence. The system mandates that both parties permit full pretrial discovery of the evidence in their possession. Finally, an aspect of the system that makes the trial less like a duel between two adversarial parties is that the inquisitorial system mandates that the judge take an active part in the conduct of the trial, with a role that is both directive and protective. Fact-finding is at the heart of the inquisitorial system. This system operates on the philosophical premise that in a criminal action the crucial factor is the body of facts, not the legal rule (in contrast to the adversarial system), and the goal of the entire procedure is to attempt to recreate, in the mind of the court, the commission of the alleged crime.Because of the inquisitorial system’s thoroughness in conducting its pretrial investigation, it can be concluded that, if given the choice, a defendant who is innocent would prefer to be tried under the inquisitorial system, whereas a defendant who is guilty would prefer to be tried under the adversarial system.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the crucial factor in a trial under the adversarial system is

Top Courses for CAT

I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher?
Question Description
I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher?.
Solutions for I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher?, a detailed solution for I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher? has been provided alongside types of I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice I have just 9 months of experience at a private bank. I was on employment bond but I broke the contract. Should I show this as my workeX through appointment letter, salary slips. Or should I fill CAT form as a fresher? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev