GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Hardin argued that grazing land held in commo...
Start Learning for Free
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.
Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?
Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?
- a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.
- b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.
- c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.
- d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.
- e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any u...
This question is based on a passage discussing Hardin's argument regarding the use of common grazing land compared to private grazing land. Hardin's argument suggests that common land would be used less carefully because individuals would be tempted to overuse it, while the costs of overuse would be shared among all users. However, the study mentioned in the passage shows that common land is actually in better condition than private land. We are asked to choose the option that, if true and known by the ranchers, would best explain this result.
Let's analyze each option:
(A) With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.
- This option does not provide a direct explanation for why common land is in better condition. It simply contrasts the distribution of costs and benefits between private and common land.
(B) The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.
- This option suggests that it is more difficult to measure the specific costs of overuse on common land. However, it does not directly explain why the common land is in better condition.
(C) An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.
- This option suggests that there may be an incentive for individuals to overuse common land in order to gain a competitive advantage. While this provides a possible explanation for overuse, it does not address why the common land is actually in better condition.
(D) If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.
- This option aligns with Hardin's argument and provides a compelling explanation for the result of the study. If one user overuses the common land, it can trigger a "tragedy of the commons" scenario where other users feel compelled to overuse it even more, leading to costs outweighing the benefits. This can result in the common land being less carefully used. However, the study shows that the common land is in better condition, suggesting that this scenario did not occur.
(E) There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.
- This option provides information about the quantity of private and common grazing land but does not directly explain why the common land is in better condition.
Based on the analysis, option (D) provides the most reasonable explanation for the study's results. If users of common land are aware that overuse leads to costs outweighing the benefits, they would be more cautious in their usage, resulting in the common land being in better condition.
Most Upvoted Answer
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any u...
This question is based on a passage discussing Hardin's argument regarding the use of common grazing land compared to private grazing land. Hardin's argument suggests that common land would be used less carefully because individuals would be tempted to overuse it, while the costs of overuse would be shared among all users. However, the study mentioned in the passage shows that common land is actually in better condition than private land. We are asked to choose the option that, if true and known by the ranchers, would best explain this result.
Let's analyze each option:
(A) With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.
- This option does not provide a direct explanation for why common land is in better condition. It simply contrasts the distribution of costs and benefits between private and common land.
(B) The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.
- This option suggests that it is more difficult to measure the specific costs of overuse on common land. However, it does not directly explain why the common land is in better condition.
(C) An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.
- This option suggests that there may be an incentive for individuals to overuse common land in order to gain a competitive advantage. While this provides a possible explanation for overuse, it does not address why the common land is actually in better condition.
(D) If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.
- This option aligns with Hardin's argument and provides a compelling explanation for the result of the study. If one user overuses the common land, it can trigger a "tragedy of the commons" scenario where other users feel compelled to overuse it even more, leading to costs outweighing the benefits. This can result in the common land being less carefully used. However, the study shows that the common land is in better condition, suggesting that this scenario did not occur.
(E) There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.
- This option provides information about the quantity of private and common grazing land but does not directly explain why the common land is in better condition.
Based on the analysis, option (D) provides the most reasonable explanation for the study's results. If users of common land are aware that overuse leads to costs outweighing the benefits, they would be more cautious in their usage, resulting in the common land being in better condition.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individuals, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.Which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would best help explain the results of the study?a)With private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.b)The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any individual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land.c)An individual who overuses common grazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.d)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more, with the consequence that the costs to each user outweigh the benefits.e)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup