GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The fire that destroyed the Municipal Buildin... Start Learning for Free
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.
The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?
  • a)
    presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawn
  • b)
    establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thing
  • c)
    justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstances
  • d)
    relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present case
  • e)
    drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situation
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi...
The argument states that the fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn and ended late in the afternoon. It further claims that anyone in the vicinity of such a fire would have noticed it. The argument then concludes that Thomas, who went from his apartment to the library that morning, must have seen the fire because there is no way for him to get to the library without passing the Municipal Building.
(A) presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawn: This choice does not apply because the argument does not present multiple pieces of evidence.
(B) establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thing: This choice accurately describes the reasoning technique used in the argument. The argument establishes that Thomas went from his apartment to the library and that there is no way for him to do so without passing the Municipal Building, thus concluding that he must have seen the fire.
(C) justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstances: This choice does not apply because the argument is not justifying the claim that Thomas's view is false based on his temptation to hold that view.
(D) relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present case: This choice does not apply because the argument does not rely on past occurrences of fires to conclude that a fire occurred in the present case.
(E) drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situation: This choice does not apply because the argument does not draw a general conclusion about what is possible based on firsthand experience.
Therefore, the correct answer is (B) establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thing. The argument establishes that Thomas went from his apartment to the library and that this route would have required him to pass the Municipal Building, thus implying that he must have seen the fire.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi...
The argument states that the fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn and ended late in the afternoon. It further claims that anyone in the vicinity of such a fire would have noticed it. The argument then concludes that Thomas, who went from his apartment to the library that morning, must have seen the fire because there is no way for him to get to the library without passing the Municipal Building.
(A) presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawn: This choice does not apply because the argument does not present multiple pieces of evidence.
(B) establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thing: This choice accurately describes the reasoning technique used in the argument. The argument establishes that Thomas went from his apartment to the library and that there is no way for him to do so without passing the Municipal Building, thus concluding that he must have seen the fire.
(C) justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstances: This choice does not apply because the argument is not justifying the claim that Thomas's view is false based on his temptation to hold that view.
(D) relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present case: This choice does not apply because the argument does not rely on past occurrences of fires to conclude that a fire occurred in the present case.
(E) drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situation: This choice does not apply because the argument does not draw a general conclusion about what is possible based on firsthand experience.
Therefore, the correct answer is (B) establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thing. The argument establishes that Thomas went from his apartment to the library and that this route would have required him to pass the Municipal Building, thus implying that he must have seen the fire.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?a)presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawnb)establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thingc)justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstancesd)relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present casee)drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev