Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Recent research shows that training programs ...

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:

a)
generalizes from too few data points.
b)
uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.
c)
assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.
d)
fails to consult alternative research studies.
e)
does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on ...

Argument: Recent research suggests that training programs emphasizing flexibility, such as yoga and pilates, are more effective at preventing injuries in athletes than programs focusing solely on strength and speed. Bournemouth Football Club had fewer injuries than Haleford Football Club in the past season. Therefore, it can be concluded that Bournemouth's training program included more flexibility activities than Haleford's program.

(A) Generalizes from too few data points: This option suggests that the argument is vulnerable because it draws a conclusion based on insufficient evidence. However, the argument compares the injury rates of two specific football clubs, so it does not necessarily generalize to all training programs. Therefore, this option is not the most vulnerable criticism.

(B) Uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises: This option suggests that the argument's conclusion is used as one of its premises. However, the argument does not rely on its own conclusion as a premise. It uses recent research to support the claim that flexibility training is more effective at preventing injuries. Therefore, this option is not the most vulnerable criticism.

(C) Assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another: This option points out that the argument assumes the training program's effectiveness based on the injury rates of the two football clubs. However, there could be other factors influencing the injury rates, such as differences in playing style, field conditions, or player behavior. Therefore, this option is the most vulnerable criticism because it questions the assumption that the difference in injury rates can be solely attributed to the training programs.

(D) Fails to consult alternative research studies: This option suggests that the argument is vulnerable because it does not consider alternative research studies. While the argument does not explicitly mention consulting other studies, it does mention recent research supporting the effectiveness of flexibility training. Therefore, the argument is not necessarily vulnerable to this criticism.

(E) Does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury: This option suggests that the argument fails to consider the difference between the frequency of injuries (incidence) and the severity of injuries (degree). However, the argument does not discuss the severity of injuries and focuses solely on the number of injuries. Therefore, this option is not the most vulnerable criticism.

In conclusion, option (C) is the most vulnerable criticism because it questions the assumption that the difference in injury rates can be solely attributed to the training programs, without considering other factors that could have influenced the outcomes.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

An independent medical research team recently did a survey at a mountain retreat founded to help heavy smokers quit or cut down on their cigarette smoking. Eight percent of those smoking three packs a day or more were able to cut down to one pack a day after they began to take SmokeFree with its patented desire suppressant. Try SmokeFree to help you cut down significantly on your smoking.Which of the following could be offered as valid criticism of the above advertisement?I. Heavy smokers may be physically as well as psychologically addicted to tobaccoII. A medicine that is effective for heavy smokers may not be effective for the population of smokers generallyIII. A survey conducted at a mountain retreat to aid smokers may yield different results than one would expect under other circumstances

View answer

The generally agreed upon definition of hallucinations is that they are actually perceptions in the absence of an external stimulus of the relevant sensory organ. These perceptions are accompanied by a persuasive sense of their reality. Hallucinations are not to be confused with illusions, which are misinterpretations of actual external stimuli. In other words, in the case of a hallucination, for a person hallucinating a sound for instance, the sound actually exists, but in reality it exists nowhere but in the persons mind; however, in the case of an illusion the stimulus that caused the illusion does exist in the real world. Although hallucinations are a key diagnostic feature of schizophrenia, a mental disorder that distorts the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, perceives reality, and relates to others, they can occur in individuals devoid of any physical or mental disorder.In order to understand why people hallucinate, some researchers have been studying people suffering from what is called the phantom limb syndrome, a condition in which people who have undergone amputation feel as though the missing body part were still very much present and attached to the body; for instance, it is not uncommon for a person who has lost a leg to unknowingly try to stand and walk without any external support after their surgery. One of the two main hypotheses behind the phantom limb syndrome offers an explanation that is possibly applicable to why people hallucinate in certain circumstances. As per this theory, the brain is programmed for a body where every body part is intact and in the appropriate place. Accordingly, when some signals go missing, because of the missing body part, the brain compensates for the lack of sensory input by triggering spontaneous nerve cell activity. Although this theory has limited applicability for understanding why patients such as those of schizophrenia hallucinate in conditions not deemed out of the ordinary, it is a step forward in understanding why people experience visual or auditory hallucinations when they are placed in solitary confinements; after all the different areas of the brain that were used to receiving signals through the senses start to stimulate themselves in to action.The author is primarily concerned with

View answer

Some museums regard themselves as keepers rather than owners of art, responsible for conserving it in the present and letting it go where circumstances are auspicious to do it in thefuture.

View answer

Efforts to gain bipartisan support for an economic stimulus package, a goal of a number of members of Congress,has not resulted in less bickering between the Demographic and Republican members of the House.

View answer

The increase in unemployment rates, coupled with significantly increased retail prices as wellas energy costs, are forcing many homeowners to look into alternative sources of fuel in orderto save money on winter heating.

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Recent research shows that training programs that include emphases on flexibility, highlighting activities such as yoga and pilates, are significantly more effective at preventing injury in athletes than are training programs that solely focus on strength and speed. The Bournemouth Football Club suffered fewer injuries than the Haleford Football Club this past season, so it can be concluded that Bournemouths training program featured more flexibility activities than did the program at Haleford.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it:a)generalizes from too few data points.b)uses its own conclusion as one of its major premises.c)assumes that the consequence of one set of circumstances would not be produced by another.d)fails to consult alternative research studies.e)does not distinguish between incidence of injury and degree of injury.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam