GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Driving under the influence is a more severe ... Start Learning for Free
Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.
Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?
  • a)
    Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.
  • b)
    Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.
  • c)
    The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.
  • d)
    Local sheriff's departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.
  • e)
    The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college stu...
It presents a scenario where social scientists are studying the problem of driving under the influence among college students at different types of universities. The researchers found a correlation between longer distances between student housing and bars/liquor stores and an increased likelihood of students being arrested or involved in accidents. The question asks you to determine which statement is most important to consider when evaluating this result.
Let's examine each answer choice and evaluate its impact on the conclusion:
(A) Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.
  • This statement suggests that the distance to bars and liquor stores may not be a significant factor contributing to the problem of driving under the influence. If students are obtaining alcohol from other sources, such as house parties or friends, then the distance to bars and liquor stores becomes less relevant. This weakens the connection between distance and the problem, so it is important to take this into account when evaluating the result. However, it does not address the severity of the problem among students at different types of universities.
(B) Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than non-student members of their communities.
  • This statement suggests that driving under the influence is a widespread issue across different university settings, regardless of the distance to alcohol sources. While this information provides context about the prevalence of the problem, it does not directly address the impact of distance on the likelihood of being arrested or involved in accidents. Therefore, it is less important to consider this statement in evaluating the result.
(C) The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.
  • This statement provides information about the average enrollment at different types of universities. However, it does not directly address the relationship between distance and the problem of driving under the influence. Therefore, it is less relevant to consider this statement in evaluating the result.
(D) Local sheriff's departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than urban police forces.
  • This statement suggests that there may be a disparity in law enforcement resources and efforts between rural/suburban areas and urban areas. If rural and suburban areas have more resources dedicated to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence, this could lead to a higher number of arrests and incidents reported in those areas, regardless of the distance to alcohol sources. This information challenges the conclusion that longer distances are the primary factor contributing to the problem and indicates that law enforcement efforts play a significant role. Therefore, it is the most important statement to consider in evaluating the result.
(E) The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.
  • This statement provides information about the availability of bars and liquor stores in urban versus rural/suburban areas. While it suggests that urban areas have more alcohol sources in a given area, it does not directly address the relationship between distance and the problem of driving under the influence. Therefore, it is less relevant to consider this statement in evaluating the result.
In conclusion, among the given options, statement (D) is the most important to take into account when evaluating the result. It challenges the assumption that longer distances to alcohol sources are the primary cause of the problem by highlighting the potential influence of law enforcement efforts.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The recruitment and development of talent is a growing priority for many organizations, and is increasingly regarded as an important competitive advantage. One example of this emphasis on talent development is the creation of so-called ‘C’ level executive roles—Chief Talent or Personnel Officer—that represent the interests of the Human Resources department. This is a significant change from past years, during which Human Resources was generally considered a lower priority, even a necessary evil, and a destination for executives that did not thrive in other departments.This change has had an important beneficiary—women.An extraordinarily high proportion of Human Resources departments are run by women, reflecting the composition of the departments themselves. For better or worse, Human Resources positions have long been perceived as natural roles for women, as women are generally regarded as more nurturing and service-oriented than their male counterparts. As these traits are considered core to the functioning of effective Human Resources personnel, the advancement of women within HR departments has been routine and that, in turn, has attracted more women. Additionally, the lifestyle of workers in the Human Resources department is often not as demanding in terms of hours and weekends worked as it is for workers in other departments; many women with children find this appealing.The preponderance of female heads of Human Resources departments and the higher prioritization of talent development have combined to give many female executives increased authority and influence. Many women, after performing well in a Human Resources capacity, have been given additional responsibilities in other departments. Also, more female executives have been asked to represent their organizations at industry conferences, further increasing their visibility.Q.Which of the following best describes the main idea of the passage?

The recruitment and development of talent is a growing priority for many organizations, and is increasingly regarded as an important competitive advantage. One example of this emphasis on talent development is the creation of so-called ‘C’ level executive roles—Chief Talent or Personnel Officer—that represent the interests of the Human Resources department. This is a significant change from past years, during which Human Resources was generally considered a lower priority, even a necessary evil, and a destination for executives that did not thrive in other departments.This change has had an important beneficiary—women.An extraordinarily high proportion of Human Resources departments are run by women, reflecting the composition of the departments themselves. For better or worse, Human Resources positions have long been perceived as natural roles for women, as women are generally regarded as more nurturing and service-oriented than their male counterparts. As these traits are considered core to the functioning of effective Human Resources personnel, the advancement of women within HR departments has been routine and that, in turn, has attracted more women. Additionally, the lifestyle of workers in the Human Resources department is often not as demanding in terms of hours and weekends worked as it is for workers in other departments; many women with children find this appealing.The preponderance of female heads of Human Resources departments and the higher prioritization of talent development have combined to give many female executives increased authority and influence. Many women, after performing well in a Human Resources capacity, have been given additional responsibilities in other departments. Also, more female executives have been asked to represent their organizations at industry conferences, further increasing their visibility.Q.The passage suggests which of the following about the “additional responsibilities” cited in the second sentence of the third paragraph?

On May 5th, 1997, the European edition of Business Tech Magazine led with Hoffman’s cover story "Internet Communities: How Theyre Shaping Electronic Commerce". This cover story highlights the extent to which the term virtual community has become almost synonymous with various forms of group-CMC (computer-mediated communication), including email-list forums, chat-systems such as IRC, web-based discussion areas and UseNet news-groups. There was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article as to whether the group-CMC discussions are really communities, rather how the community, as opposed to content, can be used to encourage people to return to a particular part of cyberspace for commercial gain. In a similar vein, Simpson and Armstrong in "Internet Gain" argue that ignoring virtual communities would be a great loss of a marketing tool for businesses. They define virtual communities as computer-mediated space where there is an integration of content and communication with an emphasis on member-generated content. Not all virtual community commentators agree with the Spartan position taken by Hoffman. Rheingold, one of the prime popularizers of the term virtual community, provides us with a more emotive definition in his book The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. According to Rheingold, "virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace". Rheingolds definition is extremely popular and has been quoted in many discussions about virtual communities. As discussed below, for social scientists, particularly sociologists, Rheingolds definition raises many issues, especially concerning the notion of community. This is because Rheingold argues via a variety of analogies from the real world such as homesteading that virtual communities are indeed new forms of "community". In fact, Rheingold implies that virtual communities are actually "a kind of ultimate flowering of a community". Moreover, Rheingold maintains that whenever computer-mediated communications technology becomes available; people inevitably create communities with it. Rheingold can thus be labeled as a technological determinist as he holds that there is a predictable relationship between technology and peoples behavior. The debate over the validity of Rheingolds position has raised doubts about the existence of virtual communities and the appropriate use of the term. Weinreich claims that the idea of virtual communities must be wrong because the community is a collective of kinship networks that share a common geographic region, a common history, and a shared value system, usually rooted in a common religion. In other words, Weinreich rejects the existence of virtual communities because group-CMC discussions cannot possibly meet his definition. In Weinreichs view, anyone with even a basic knowledge of sociology understands that information exchange in no way constitutes a community.Q.Weinreich rejects Rheingold’s inclusion of virtual communities in the definition of communities for all of the following reasons EXCEPT

On May 5th, 1997, the European edition of Business Tech Magazine led with Hoffman’s cover story "Internet Communities: How Theyre Shaping Electronic Commerce". This cover story highlights the extent to which the term virtual community has become almost synonymous with various forms of group-CMC (computer-mediated communication), including email-list forums, chat-systems such as IRC, web-based discussion areas and UseNet news-groups. There was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article as to whether the group-CMC discussions are really communities, rather how the community, as opposed to content, can be used to encourage people to return to a particular part of cyberspace for commercial gain. In a similar vein, Simpson and Armstrong in "Internet Gain" argue that ignoring virtual communities would be a great loss of a marketing tool for businesses. They define virtual communities as computer-mediated space where there is an integration of content and communication with an emphasis on member-generated content. Not all virtual community commentators agree with the Spartan position taken by Hoffman. Rheingold, one of the prime popularizers of the term virtual community, provides us with a more emotive definition in his book The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. According to Rheingold, "virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace". Rheingolds definition is extremely popular and has been quoted in many discussions about virtual communities. As discussed below, for social scientists, particularly sociologists, Rheingolds definition raises many issues, especially concerning the notion of community. This is because Rheingold argues via a variety of analogies from the real world such as homesteading that virtual communities are indeed new forms of "community". In fact, Rheingold implies that virtual communities are actually "a kind of ultimate flowering of a community". Moreover, Rheingold maintains that whenever computer-mediated communications technology becomes available; people inevitably create communities with it. Rheingold can thus be labeled as a technological determinist as he holds that there is a predictable relationship between technology and peoples behavior. The debate over the validity of Rheingolds position has raised doubts about the existence of virtual communities and the appropriate use of the term. Weinreich claims that the idea of virtual communities must be wrong because the community is a collective of kinship networks that share a common geographic region, a common history, and a shared value system, usually rooted in a common religion. In other words, Weinreich rejects the existence of virtual communities because group-CMC discussions cannot possibly meet his definition. In Weinreichs view, anyone with even a basic knowledge of sociology understands that information exchange in no way constitutes a community.Q.According to Simpson and Armstrong, virtual communities

The recruitment and development of talent is a growing priority for many organizations, and is increasingly regarded as an important competitive advantage. One example of this emphasis on talent development is the creation of so-called ‘C’ level executive roles—Chief Talent or Personnel Officer—that represent the interests of the Human Resources department. This is a significant change from past years, during which Human Resources was generally considered a lower priority, even a necessary evil, and a destination for executives that did not thrive in other departments.This change has had an important beneficiary—women.An extraordinarily high proportion of Human Resources departments are run by women, reflecting the composition of the departments themselves. For better or worse, Human Resources positions have long been perceived as natural roles for women, as women are generally regarded as more nurturing and service-oriented than their male counterparts. As these traits are considered core to the functioning of effective Human Resources personnel, the advancement of women within HR departments has been routine and that, in turn, has attracted more women. Additionally, the lifestyle of workers in the Human Resources department is often not as demanding in terms of hours and weekends worked as it is for workers in other departments; many women with children find this appealing.The preponderance of female heads of Human Resources departments and the higher prioritization of talent development have combined to give many female executives increased authority and influence. Many women, after performing well in a Human Resources capacity, have been given additional responsibilities in other departments. Also, more female executives have been asked to represent their organizations at industry conferences, further increasing their visibility.Q.The passage implies that an organization with a Chief Talent Officer

Top Courses for GMAT

Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?a)Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.b)Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.c)The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.d)Local sheriffs departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.e)The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev