All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
ACT Exam  >  ACT Questions  >  Directions:In the passages that follow, some ... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.
Passage
Body Armor
If you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?
(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no “bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.
As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modern protective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)
Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area. 
(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries. 
Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.
Q. (6)
  • a)
    No change
  • b)
    Nevertheless,
  • c)
    Unfortunately,
  • d)
    Therefore,
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your ACT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are und...
The best answer is c. This question requires you to select the best transition between sentences. The word “soon” implies a sense of time that does not fit within the context of the paragraph. Eliminate answer choice a. The paragraph discusses the importance of protecting the wearer from bullets.
It makes sense that, because the flak-jacket did not protect the wearer from bullets, that the best transition word to use is “unfortunately.”
Explore Courses for ACT exam

Similar ACT Doubts

Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageCoffee in the ShadeWho would have thought that there was any connection between a cup of coffee and a bird, butterfly, or even a bat? Such seems to be the case, (1) however, as methods for cultivating coffee plants have gradually changed over the past 30 to 40 years. Coffee plants were first discovered growing (2) naturally, in Africa; hundreds of years ago. The plants grew under a wide canopy of forests, which protected the coffee plants’ tender leaves from the burning sun. As coffee was introduced to (3) other country, growers would naturally attempt to simulate the plants’ preferred natural habitat. (4) Nevertheless, coffee plantations all over the world could be found growing successfully in the shade of tall trees. These trees provided more than shade for (5) coffee plants; so they were also home and protection for many species of birds, reptiles, insects, and other plants.Over the past several decades, (6) growers were developing a new kind of coffee plant, one which (7) is not only tolerant of the sun but thrives in open sunlight. Sun-grown coffee produced as much as three times the yield of shade-grown coffee in the same (8) amount with time and space.(9) Consequently, the high demand for coffee throughout the world makes the sun-grown method of coffee production appear to be the best method.1. It has been discovered, however, that there are some unanticipated consequences to using this newer method ofgrowing coffee.2. First, (10) there might be a chance of rain, often washing away the soil’s nutrients and minerals.3. Ornithologists (11) who are discovering alarming decreases in some species of songbirds that migrate to the northern United States.4. This necessitates an increased use of fertilizers and additives, which is labor-intensive and liable to create health risks.5. Second, (12) as forests are taken down to make way for sun-grown coffee plants, native and migratory (13) birds, as well as many other fauna and flora, no longer have a home.6. This is threatening many species, and the effect is now being examined and recorded.7. Finally, more pesticides and insecticides are used in the sun-grown method, all of which take their toll on both the environment and the long-term health of the coffee plants themselves. (14)Today, shade-grown coffee is more difficult to find and thus more costly. Sitting out on the patio with a morning cup of coffee may soon be a much quieter experience in some locations due to the decimation of certain local songbird species. (15) As more people recognize the connection between coffee production and the environment, perhaps they will be willing to pay the higher prices, encouraging growers to return to the more natural method of producing this world-wide staple.Q. (12)Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion would NOT be acceptable?

Directions: In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.The following paragraphs may or may not be in the most logical order. You may be asked questions about the logical order of the paragraphs, as well as where to place sentences logically within any given paragraph.PassageMichigan’s Mesmeric StoneSome residents of Michigan would probably be (1) surprised and shocked to learn that, during the Devonian Age, 350 million years ago, this northern state was located near the earth’s equator. At that time, Michigan was (2) hidden underneath by a warm body of water. It was this marine environment that eventually produced Michigan’s unique rock formation known as the Petoskey stone.The light brown Petoskey stone is easily distinguished from other stones (3) having its pattern of numerous and contiguous six-sided cells. These cells were once the living coral that was present during the Devonian Age, which (4) slow became petrified into rock that was then gradually carried north by the slow movement of glaciers. Petoskey stones can vary in appearance, largely due to the content of each coral cell. Most Petoskey stones contain high levelsof calcite, (5) but some also contain quartz, pyrite, silica, and other minerals. Because of this variety in makeup, polishing a Petoskey stone can either be a fairly simple task or one that (6) highly requires a high level of skill and patience.1. Some rock collectors might be fortunate to find a Petoskey stone that has been naturally polished by (7) wind; sand; and water.2. In many cases, though, the stones are not exposed to the elements, so some hard labor might be necessary to produce a smooth, shiny surface that displays the stones’ unique pattern.3. (8) Despite this, the calcite contained in Petoskey stone is highly conducive to (9) hand polishing; it is soft enough to give way to sandpaper, yet strong enough to accept the polishing compound that is usually applied once all the scratch marks have been carefully sanded away.4.It is important to take time to remove all of the scratches, (10) then they will be present in the finished stone along with the coral fossils. (11)For the serious rock enthusiast, investing in an electric rock tumbler is a good way to simplify the process of rock-polishing. Simply place the collected rocks into the paint-can sized canister, add polishing compound, and push the button. This begins a long rotation process whereby the (12) stones are abraded until they have a smooth, glossy finish.One advantage of using a rock tumbler instead of hand polishing the stones (13) are that the tumbler can do the work while you scout for more stones to put in it!Petoskey stones are often difficult to find, depending on the season of the year. Generally, early spring will bring in a new crop of stones after the ice has melted and the stones have been pushed to the shorelines of the northern Great Lakes. (14) A good rain will highlight the Petoskey stone’s coral pattern, making it easier to spot in the sand. Of course, you can always find Petoskey stones in tourist shops throughout the northern part of the state, but it is much more fun and satisfying to locate one yourself as you walk along the beautiful beaches of Michigan.Q. (8)

Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageCoffee in the ShadeWho would have thought that there was any connection between a cup of coffee and a bird, butterfly, or even a bat? Such seems to be the case, (1) however, as methods for cultivating coffee plants have gradually changed over the past 30 to 40 years. Coffee plants were first discovered growing (2) naturally, in Africa; hundreds of years ago. The plants grew under a wide canopy of forests, which protected the coffee plants’ tender leaves from the burning sun. As coffee was introduced to (3) other country, growers would naturally attempt to simulate the plants’ preferred natural habitat. (4) Nevertheless, coffee plantations all over the world could be found growing successfully in the shade of tall trees. These trees provided more than shade for (5) coffee plants; so they were also home and protection for many species of birds, reptiles, insects, and other plants.Over the past several decades, (6) growers were developing a new kind of coffee plant, one which (7) is not only tolerant of the sun but thrives in open sunlight. Sun-grown coffee produced as much as three times the yield of shade-grown coffee in the same (8) amount with time and space.(9) Consequently, the high demand for coffee throughout the world makes the sun-grown method of coffee production appear to be the best method.1. It has been discovered, however, that there are some unanticipated consequences to using this newer method ofgrowing coffee.2. First, (10) there might be a chance of rain, often washing away the soil’s nutrients and minerals.3. Ornithologists (11) who are discovering alarming decreases in some species of songbirds that migrate to the northern United States.4. This necessitates an increased use of fertilizers and additives, which is labor-intensive and liable to create health risks.5. Second, (12) as forests are taken down to make way for sun-grown coffee plants, native and migratory (13) birds, as well as many other fauna and flora, no longer have a home.6. This is threatening many species, and the effect is now being examined and recorded.7. Finally, more pesticides and insecticides are used in the sun-grown method, all of which take their toll on both the environment and the long-term health of the coffee plants themselves. (14)Today, shade-grown coffee is more difficult to find and thus more costly. Sitting out on the patio with a morning cup of coffee may soon be a much quieter experience in some locations due to the decimation of certain local songbird species. (15) As more people recognize the connection between coffee production and the environment, perhaps they will be willing to pay the higher prices, encouraging growers to return to the more natural method of producing this world-wide staple.Q. (7)Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion would NOT be acceptable?

Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassagePuzzling NumbersThe Japanese number game Sudoku has taken the world (1) with storm. While crossword puzzles seem to be the game of choice, (2) they need only sit in an airport or doctor’s office in any city to see how Sudoku is slowly overtaking the popular word game.In the most common game of Sudoku, the player is faced with a nine-by-nine space grid with a total of 81 spaces. The solution to the puzzle requires a number, one through nine, to be placed in each box. (3) Each number must appear only once in each row and only once in each column. A Sudoku puzzle will begin with a few digits already in place. The solver’s (4) task, is to figure out which numeral belongs in the remaining empty spaces. While being a math whiz is no requirement for this seemingly simple process, a level of logic and reasoning (5) is necessary in order to choose the correct number for each space. As with most such activities, practice makes perfect with Sudoku. The puzzles that seem impossible at first glance (6) eventual become more manageable.The name Sudoku is derived from the phrase single number in the Japanese language. (7) Nevertheless, its definition refers to the placement or allotment of a single number. This puzzle is aptly (8) named, since the misplacement of a single number spells the beginning of an incorrect solution. For this reason, Sudoku (9) should have been played using a pencil with a good eraser.It is nearly impossible to discern (10) which number the solver has placed incorrectly once an error is discovered. If you don’t have a pencil, use a pen to write the digit as a series of light dots. This way, (11) should you make a mistake, you can retrace your steps to locate and correct the original errant placement.There are certain strategies involved in solving a Sudoku puzzle, including the process of elimination. For example, if a row of nine spaces already has the number 4, that row cannot contain another 4. This goes for columns as well. The solver can use these clues and a bit of deduction to limit the possible combinations of numbers. By attacking the puzzle using (12) logic, you can turn the process into an amusing challenge rather than an impossible task.1. The origin of Sudoku is attributed to Leonhard Euler, the Swiss mathematician who (13) sometimes developed the game Magic Squares in 1783.2. In fact, Euler’s game was actually based on a game derived from Chinese folklore.3. The primary difference between Magic Squares and Sudoku is that Euler’s game has no grid dividing the puzzle and it is somewhat easier to solve, since there are multiple possibilities for a solution.4.In true Sudoku, each puzzle has only one solution.5. The puzzle’s difficulty varies according to the number of digits that are initially provided.6. When faced with a puzzle with only one 3 provided, for example, you can be sure that it will be more difficult to solve than a puzzle that already has half of the numbers placed in the correct boxes. (14)One has only to examine a local newspaper to ascertain the popularity of this addictive brain teaser. Where comics and crossword puzzles reign supreme, it is often easy to locate a grid of spaces and numbers tucked off in a corner, or even sitting boldly next to the time-honored crossword.Q. (8)Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion would be LEAST acceptable?

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageNATURAL SCIENCE: A Short History of HomeopathyHomeopathy is a system for treating physical dis-ease and other ailments using the theory of treating“like with like.” In practice, homeopathic medicineseeks substances that mimic an ailment’s symptoms;(5) this sameness is considered “likeness.” The substanceis then diluted to infinitesimal amounts and admin-istered to the patient in order to cure the problem.Homeopathic treatment is currently in use for every-thing from cancer to colds and flu, though many(10) scientists remain heavily skeptical about its efficacy.Homeopathy was developed in the late 18thcentury by the German medical doctor SamuelHahnemann. Despite being a physician himself,Hahnemann was deeply skeptical of the medical prac-(15) tices of his time. In general, 18th century medicinewas founded on the theory of the four temperaments,or “humors”: Choleric, Melancholic, Sanguine, andPhlegmatic. These temperaments were based on thevarious possible combinations of hot and cold and wet(20) and dry. A choleric, or angry, disposition meant thata person had a constitution that was essentially hotand dry. Phlegmatic, or unemotional, persons werethought to be cold and wet. Melancholy was caused byan excess of cold and dry, whereas Sanguine, or(25) passionate, persons were hot and wet.Humors theory was first developed by theGreek physician Hippocrates, the founder of westernmedicine, and later expanded upon by Galen. When aperson became ill, doctors believed it was because one(30) or more of the humors had come out of balance. Someof the best treatments were thought to be bloodlettingand purgation —the assumption being that these treat-ments would effectively drain off the excess humors.Other popular treatments included blistering plasters(35) and emetics. Often the treatment proved worse thanthe disease. Many patients died from excessive blood-loss or were poisoned by unregulated medications. Inthis environment, Hahnemann’s skepticism was wellwarranted.(40) Hahnemann first stumbled upon his theory whenhe was investigating a common treatment for malaria,cinchona bark. Modern scientists now know thatcinchona bark contains quinine—a substance still usedto treat malaria—but at the time, no one knew why(45) the bark was effective. Hahnemann chose to imple-ment the concept of treating “like with like” by testingan undiluted dose of the bark on himself. Finding thathe had symptoms similar to those of malaria sufferers,Hahnemann concluded that effective drugs must pro-(50) duce symptoms in healthy people that are similar tothose produced by the diseases that the drugs wouldbe expected to treat. Hahnemann further hypothesizedthat, while undiluted substances would only worsensymptoms in the sick, heavily diluted substances could(55) be effective for a cure. The doctor and his colleaguesthen proceeded to test a variety of substances to seewhat symptoms they induced, in the hopes of find-ing cures for diseases with similar symptoms. Perhapsnot surprisingly, Hahnemann’s new field of homeopa-(60) thy (i.e. “similar suffering”) was met with considerableresistance from doctors comfortable with their usualpractices.In fact, Hahnemann’s methodology for scien-tifically testing potential treatments was remarkably(65) modern. Nevertheless, his conclusions remain extraor-dinarily controversial. One of the main points ofcontention involves the standard homeopathic prac-tice of heavy dilution to create the appropriate doseof a substance. Dilution of homeopathic substances(70) happens in stages. Hahnemann had hypothesized thatshaking the solution after each dilution would imprintthe molecular “memory” of the original substance intothe solution, which would allow the diluted dose to beeffective without the possibility of overdose or adverse(75) side effects.Modern scientists have been unable to find anyevidence to support the theory of molecular memory. Infact, the idea that diluting a substance makes it strongerruns against the principles of chemistry and physics.(80) Moreover, scientists point to a lack of standardizedclinical data on homeopathic treatment. Clinical studiesthat do show effectiveness indicate that homeopathiccure rates are generally equal to those of placebos.Today, many conventional medical practitioners(85) generally disregard homeopathy. Homeopathic prac-titioners are frequently termed quacks by conven-tional scientists. Nevertheless, homeopathy remainsextremely popular both in the United States and abroad.In European countries such as France and England,(90) conventional doctors frequently prescribe homeopathictreatments for common illnesses such as colds and flu.Pharmacists who are trained to answer questions aboutthe homeopathic treatments’ use and desired effectsthen fill the prescriptions.Q.According to the passage, one of the reasons modern scientists are unable to find evidence to support homeopathic treatment is because

Top Courses for ACTView all

Top Courses for ACT

Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for ACT 2025 is part of ACT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the ACT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for ACT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for ACT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for ACT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (6)a)No changeb)Nevertheless,c)Unfortunately,d)Therefore,Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice ACT tests.
Explore Courses for ACT exam

Top Courses for ACT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup