Question Description
Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for ACT 2025 is part of ACT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the ACT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for ACT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for ACT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for ACT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:In the passages that follow, some words and phrases are underlined and numbered. In the answer column, you will find alternatives for the words and phrases that are underlined. If you think that the original version is best, choose “NO CHANGE,”. You will also find questions about a particular section of the passage, or about the entire passage. These questions will be identified either by an underlined portion or by a number in a box. Look for the answer that clearly expresses the idea, is consistent with the style and tone of the passage, and makes the correct use of standard written English. Read the passage through once before answering the questions. For some questions, you should read beyond the indicated portion before you answer.PassageBody ArmorIf you were an officer of the law or an armed military person, would you prefer to wear a “bullet-proof vest” or “soft body armor” under your (1) suit and uniform?(2) Most often the person would probably opt for the bullet-proof vest, as its name tends to denote a higher level of security. The problem, though, is that no“bullet-proof vest” (3) is really bullet-proof. In fact, there is no protective clothing currently available that offers complete protection from firearms.As weaponry and ammunition have changed through (4) the centuries; so have the materials from which protective clothing is made. During the black powder era of the 1700s, silk (5) was the material of choice to ward off injury or death from a black powder ball. Black powder propelled lead balls were much slower than present-day bullets, and silk was sometimes fairly effective protection against weapons at longer ranges. During World War II, the “flak jacket” was developed as a protective device. (6) Soon, the best this attire could do was to protect the wearer from shrapnel, not from the bullets themselves. (7) Today’s modernprotective vests are made from a variety of synthetic materials, some of which are (8) more with effectiveness than others. The idea is to produce a material that is strong enough to ward off high-speed bullets yet light enough to allow for ease of movement. This can be a daunting task when cost is also considered,(9)Most people have the idea that protective gear causes a bullet to deflect off (10) of it, almost similar to a Ping-Pong ball hitting the lid of a tin can. However, these vests actually absorb the impact of the (11) bullet spreading its energy around the body (12) rather than been sustained in a single area.(13) Normally, the layers of the vest’s material will stop the bullet from entering the body. However, the vest’s wearer is very likely to sustain bruises (14) and perhaps even internal injuries.Most police officers and military personnel are happy to don their protective clothing as they head out on their assignments. However, they know better than anyone that their safety and security cannot be (15) entrusting completely to their protective gear.Q. (14)The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion. If the writer chooses to delete this phrase, the paragraph would primarily lose a statement that suggests:a)wearing protective gear does not necessarily ensure that there will be a lack of serious injury.b)wearing protective clothing ensures that there will be absolute safety from serious injury.c)wearing protective gear always protects the wearer from death.d)a wearer of protective gear will probably only sustain bruises.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice ACT tests.