GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of scie...
Start Learning for Free
Science teacher: An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.
Which one of the following is an assumption the science teacher's argument requires?
- a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.
- b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.
- c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.
- d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.
- e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful...
(A) Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. - WRONG. Bit of an extreme case rather an inference.
(B) Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues. - WRONG. Its like C only. A comparison is not necessarily true.
(C) Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all. - WRONG. This can be somewhat an inference for this passage. However, it is not true neither it helps.
(D) No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues. - WRONG. There can be such a situation wherein out of 1000 courses only 2 teach but eventually that leads us to nowhere. The argument still remains valid as it follows the majority aspects. So, this choice is a extreme case or exceptional case that does not help us in reaching the conclusion. It does not necessarily need to be true.
(E) The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. - CORRECT. If not so then conclusion falls apart.
(B) Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues. - WRONG. Its like C only. A comparison is not necessarily true.
(C) Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all. - WRONG. This can be somewhat an inference for this passage. However, it is not true neither it helps.
(D) No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues. - WRONG. There can be such a situation wherein out of 1000 courses only 2 teach but eventually that leads us to nowhere. The argument still remains valid as it follows the majority aspects. So, this choice is a extreme case or exceptional case that does not help us in reaching the conclusion. It does not necessarily need to be true.
(E) The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. - CORRECT. If not so then conclusion falls apart.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Science teacher:An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives. But the skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making such decisions. Therefore, secondary school science courses should teach students to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues, such as health and public policy, instead of or perhaps in addition to teaching more abstract aspects of science.Which one of the following is an assumption the science teachers argument requires?a)Secondary schools should teach only those skills that are the most useful for the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.b)Teaching secondary school students the more abstract aspects of science is at least as important as teaching them to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.c)Adults who have an abstract knowledge of science are no better at evaluating science-based arguments regarding practical issues than are adults who have no knowledge of science at all.d)No secondary school science courses currently teach students how to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues.e)The ability to evaluate science-based arguments regarding practical issues is sometimes useful in making the decisions that adults typically make in their daily lives.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup