Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefand#64257;cient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefand#64257;cient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefand#64257;cient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass andtimes; g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

ACT Exam > ACT Questions > Directions:Read the passages and choose the b...

Directions: Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.

Passage
A group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.
Experiment 1
A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.
The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.
This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).
The results are shown in Table 1.

Experiment 2
The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.

Q. Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?

a)
Brand Y only.
b)
Brand Z only.
c)
Brands X and Y only.
d)
Brands X and Z only.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each questi...

Table 2 shows the results of Experiment 2. In the table, brands X and Y were both tested with 50 g, 150 g, and 250 g objects.
Brand Z, however, was only tested with 150 g and 250 g objects. Answer choice B is correct because only brand Z cooking spray was tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2.

Answered by Orion Classes · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for ACT exam

Similar ACT Doubts

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Based on the results of Experiments 1 and 2, which of the following combinations would result in the surface with the least coefﬁcient of static friction?

View answer

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.The students’ instructor gave them one piece of nonstick cookware and asked them to identify the brand. The students repeated the procedures followed in Experiment 1 and obtained average forces of 0.088 N for the 150 gram object and 0.149 N for the 250 gram object. Which of the following brands would most likely have produced these results?

View answer

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.The results of the 2 experiments support the conclusion that as the weight of an object increases, the average force required to move it from rest generally

View answer

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.If Experiment 1 was repeated for Brand B cookware with a 200 gram mass, the average force needed to disturb the object from rest would be closest to

View answer

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageFriction is the resistance to the movement of one object past another object with which the ﬁrst object is in contact.A group of students performed several experiments using rectangular blocks of various materials and a smooth inclined plane 2 meters in length. To compare how different materials are affected by friction, the blocks were placed at the top of the plane and released to travel the 2-meter distance. The time in seconds (s) that it took for each block to reach the end of the inclined plane was recorded.Experiment 1The group of students wanted to know which materials moved down the plane in the shortest amount of time. The students used blocks of wood, steel, aluminum, glass, plastic, and concrete. The dimensions of each block were the same, the volume of each block remained constant, and the mass of the blocks was varied. The incline of the plane was set at 45 for each trial. The students conducted 3 trials for each material, and recorded the results in Table 1.Experiment 2The students conducted a similar experiment as in Experiment 1 to test the effect of volume on the time that it took for the blocks to move down the inclined plane. The results are shown in Table 2.Experiment 3Objects can be rated according to their ability to move efﬁciently. The students created a scale from 5 to 30 (least to most resistant to motion due to friction) and tested four objects of a known rating. Three trials were conducted for each object, using the same methods as in Experiment 1. The results are shown in Table 3.Q.In which of the following ways are the designs of Experiments 1 and 2 different?

View answer

Top Courses for ACTView all

ACT Mock Test Series 2025

Biology for ACT

How to Prepare for ACT

Mathematics for ACT

Chemistry for ACT

Top Courses for ACT

View all

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for ACT 2025 is part of ACT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the ACT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for ACT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for ACT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for ACT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageA group of students conducted several experiments using a variety of nonstick cookware, a spring scale, and several different weighted objects. Their goal was to determine which brand of cookware products had the best nonstick surface by measuring the coefﬁcient of static friction, which is a measure of how resistant a stationary object is to movement.Experiment 1A student connected the spring scale to a weighted object that was placed inside a piece of nonstick cookware as shown in Figure 1.The students planned to calculate the coefﬁcient of static friction by determining the force required to disturb an object from rest. During the experiment, one student anchored the nonstick cookware be holding tightly to the handle while the other student attached a weighted, smooth steel object to the spring scale. The student pulled on the spring until the object began to move. A third student recorded the force in newtons, N, indicated on the spring scale at the moment the object began to move across the nonstick surface.This procedure was repeated for 3 different brands of cookware; each brand of cookware was tested with various weighted objects. The coefﬁcient of static friction was calculated by dividing the average force required to move the object by its weight (mass × g, the gravitational constant).The results are shown in Table 1.Experiment 2The students performed an experiment similar to Experiment 1, except three different brands of cooking spray were applied to the same cookware surface before the weights were put in place. The results are shown in Table 2.Q.Which brand(s) of cooking spray was/were tested with only 2 different weights in Experiment 2?a)Brand Y only.b)Brand Z only.c)Brands X and Y only.d)Brands X and Z only.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice ACT tests.

Explore Courses for ACT exam