ACT Exam  >  ACT Questions  >  Directions:Read the passages and choose the b... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.
Passage
HUMANITIES:
This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903
My reader may well feel that goodness is already
the most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yet
he may at the same time suspect that there is something
about it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It
(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothing
else does, so that no estimate of its influence can be
excessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick out
a dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enter
into business, we always do it in the hope of attaining
(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-
tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt to
assume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-
nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarity
obscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So
(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of life
that it is hard to disentangle.
Consequently, we employ the word or some
synonym of it during pretty much every waking hour of
our lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned
(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”
fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”
“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He could
not make men and women talk right without incessant
reference to this concept.
(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I do
not ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actually
do. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-
logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get at
the plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader
(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions he
uses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches to
it. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,
we will through them inquire when and why we call
things good.
(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,
a knife is made for something, for cutting. Whenever
the knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, and
with a minimum of effort on the part of him who steers
it, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or
(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,
then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, looking
at the matter from another point of view, whenever the
handle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following its
lines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that
(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,
the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,
an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and in
its conformity to the hand. Its goodness always has
reference to something outside itself, and is measured
(50) by its performance of an external task.
Or take something not so palpable. What glorious
weather! When we woke this morning, drew aside our
curtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”
And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We
(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to its
various purposes. Intending to go to our office, we saw
there was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew that
the streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,
business and social duties would move forward easily.
(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a good
day we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted to
something outside itself.
A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.
There when the question is asked, “Has the baby
(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-
ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying or
quiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquired
positive standards of measurement. It must be reckoned
in negative terms, a failure to disturb.
(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in the
remark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is good
without respect.” We must have some respect or end in
mind in reference to which the goodness is compared.
Good always means good “for.” That little preposition
(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need not
audibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and the
day for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.
To be bad or good implies external reference. To be
good means to be an efficient means; and the end to
(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the word
good is spoken.
In short, whenever we inspect the usage of the
word good, we always find behind it an implication of
some end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The
(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.
Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-
thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamlet
says, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinking
makes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or
(90) act when it becomes good.
Q. The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:
  • a)
    both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.
  • b)
    neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.
  • c)
    both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.
  • d)
    neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each questi...
The best answer is c. The author writes “goodness always has reference to something outside itself, and is measured by its performance of an external task.” The author goes on to write, “The knife is good for cutting and the day for business ... To be bad or good implies external reference.” This best supports answer choice c.
Explore Courses for ACT exam

Similar ACT Doubts

Direction:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageNATURAL SCIENCE: Heredity and Gene-linkage: A Possible RelationshipThe ability of every organism on earth to repro-duce is the hallmark of life. Reproduction can be eitherasexual, involving a single parent, or sexual, involvingtwo parents. Sexual reproduction begets offspring that(5)inherit half of their genes from each parent. This trans-mission of genes from one generation to the next iscalled heredity.Each hereditary unit, the gene, contains specificencoded information that translates into an organism’s(10)inherited traits. Inherited traits range from hair color,to height to susceptibility to disease. Genes are actu-ally segments of the DNA molecule, and it is theprecise replication of DNA that produces copies ofgenes that can be passed from parents to offspring.(15)DNA is subdivided into chromosomes that each includehundreds or thousands of genes. The specific traits orcharacteristics of each offspring depend on the arrange-ment and combination of the chromosomes supplied byboth parents.(20)Genes located on the same chromosome tend tobe inherited together. Transmission of these so-calledlinked genes can affect the inheritance of two dif-ferent characteristics. Thomas Hunt Morgan was thefirst biologist to associate specific genes with specific(25)chromosomes. In the early 20th century, Morganselected a species of fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster,on which to study his genetic theory. The fruit fly is aprolific breeder, producing hundreds of offspring in asingle mating. In addition, the fruit fly has only four(30)pairs of easily distinguishable chromosomes, makingit the ideal experimental organism. Soon after Morgancommenced working with Drosophila, he began tonotice variations in certain traits.For example, Morgan noticed that the natural(35)characteristics of Drosophila included gray bodiesand normal wings. However, mutant examples ofthese characteristics sometimes appeared; these flieshad black bodies, and much smaller, vestigial wings.Morgan crossed female flies that appeared normal, but(40)carried the mutant genes, with males that exhibited themutations. He expected the offspring to include equalnumbers of gray flies with normal wings, black flieswith vestigial wings, gray flies with vestigial wings,and black flies with normal wings. What he found was(45)a disproportionate number of gray flies with normalwings and black flies with vestigial wings, which sug-gested to him that the genes for body color and wingsize are transmitted together from parents to offspringbecause they are located on the same chromosome and(50)must be somehow linked.Additional research conducted by Morgan onD. melanogaster demonstrated that many, often spon-taneous mutations occur across generations. Theseobservations, together with the results of experiments(55)carried out to test his theory on linked genes, ledMorgan to postulate that the location of the genes onthe chromosomes contributes to the likelihood of anygiven gene being transmitted from parent to offspring.This theory of linear arrangement, along with Morgan’s(60)other important contributions to the field of genetics,led to his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiologyor Medicine in 1933.Current research exploring the significance oflinked genes reveals that many factors affect the trans-(65)mission of certain traits from parents to offspring. Thelocation of genes on a particular chromosome is but oneof a multitude of determinants involved in whether ornot a characteristic will be inherited.Q.With which of the following statements would the author most likely agree?

Direction:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageNATURAL SCIENCE: Heredity and Gene-linkage: A Possible RelationshipThe ability of every organism on earth to repro-duce is the hallmark of life. Reproduction can be eitherasexual, involving a single parent, or sexual, involvingtwo parents. Sexual reproduction begets offspring thatLine 5inherit half of their genes from each parent. This trans-mission of genes from one generation to the next iscalled heredity.Each hereditary unit, the gene, contains specificencoded information that translates into an organism’s10inherited traits. Inherited traits range from hair color,to height to susceptibility to disease. Genes are actu-ally segments of the DNA molecule, and it is theprecise replication of DNA that produces copies ofgenes that can be passed from parents to offspring.15DNA is subdivided into chromosomes that each includehundreds or thousands of genes. The specific traits orcharacteristics of each offspring depend on the arrange-ment and combination of the chromosomes supplied byboth parents.20Genes located on the same chromosome tend tobe inherited together. Transmission of these so-calledlinked genes can affect the inheritance of two dif-ferent characteristics. Thomas Hunt Morgan was thefirst biologist to associate specific genes with specific25chromosomes. In the early 20th century, Morganselected a species of fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster,on which to study his genetic theory. The fruit fly is aprolific breeder, producing hundreds of offspring in asingle mating. In addition, the fruit fly has only four30pairs of easily distinguishable chromosomes, makingit the ideal experimental organism. Soon after Morgancommenced working with Drosophila, he began tonotice variations in certain traits.For example, Morgan noticed that the natural35characteristics of Drosophila included gray bodiesand normal wings. However, mutant examples ofthese characteristics sometimes appeared; these flieshad black bodies, and much smaller, vestigial wings.Morgan crossed female flies that appeared normal, but40carried the mutant genes, with males that exhibited themutations. He expected the offspring to include equalnumbers of gray flies with normal wings, black flieswith vestigial wings, gray flies with vestigial wings,and black flies with normal wings. What he found was45a disproportionate number of gray flies with normalwings and black flies with vestigial wings, which sug-gested to him that the genes for body color and wingsize are transmitted together from parents to offspringbecause they are located on the same chromosome and50must be somehow linked.Additional research conducted by Morgan onD. melanogaster demonstrated that many, often spon-taneous mutations occur across generations. Theseobservations, together with the results of experiments55carried out to test his theory on linked genes, ledMorgan to postulate that the location of the genes onthe chromosomes contributes to the likelihood of anygiven gene being transmitted from parent to offspring.This theory of linear arrangement, along with Morgan’s60other important contributions to the field of genetics,led to his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiologyor Medicine in 1933.Current research exploring the significance oflinked genes reveals that many factors affect the trans-65mission of certain traits from parents to offspring. Thelocation of genes on a particular chromosome is but oneof a multitude of determinants involved in whether ornot a characteristic will be inherited.Q.As it is used in line 28, the word prolific most nearly means

Direction:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageNATURAL SCIENCE: Heredity and Gene-linkage: A Possible RelationshipThe ability of every organism on earth to repro-duce is the hallmark of life. Reproduction can be eitherasexual, involving a single parent, or sexual, involvingtwo parents. Sexual reproduction begets offspring that(5)inherit half of their genes from each parent. This trans-mission of genes from one generation to the next iscalled heredity.Each hereditary unit, the gene, contains specificencoded information that translates into an organism’s(10)inherited traits. Inherited traits range from hair color,to height to susceptibility to disease. Genes are actu-ally segments of the DNA molecule, and it is theprecise replication of DNA that produces copies ofgenes that can be passed from parents to offspring.(15)DNA is subdivided into chromosomes that each includehundreds or thousands of genes. The specific traits orcharacteristics of each offspring depend on the arrange-ment and combination of the chromosomes supplied byboth parents.(20)Genes located on the same chromosome tend tobe inherited together. Transmission of these so-calledlinked genes can affect the inheritance of two dif-ferent characteristics. Thomas Hunt Morgan was thefirst biologist to associate specific genes with specific(25)chromosomes. In the early 20th century, Morganselected a species of fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster,on which to study his genetic theory. The fruit fly is aprolific breeder, producing hundreds of offspring in asingle mating. In addition, the fruit fly has only four(30)pairs of easily distinguishable chromosomes, makingit the ideal experimental organism. Soon after Morgancommenced working with Drosophila, he began tonotice variations in certain traits.For example, Morgan noticed that the natural(35)characteristics of Drosophila included gray bodiesand normal wings. However, mutant examples ofthese characteristics sometimes appeared; these flieshad black bodies, and much smaller, vestigial wings.Morgan crossed female flies that appeared normal, but(40)carried the mutant genes, with males that exhibited themutations. He expected the offspring to include equalnumbers of gray flies with normal wings, black flieswith vestigial wings, gray flies with vestigial wings,and black flies with normal wings. What he found was(45)a disproportionate number of gray flies with normalwings and black flies with vestigial wings, which sug-gested to him that the genes for body color and wingsize are transmitted together from parents to offspringbecause they are located on the same chromosome and(50)must be somehow linked.Additional research conducted by Morgan onD. melanogaster demonstrated that many, often spon-taneous mutations occur across generations. Theseobservations, together with the results of experiments(55)carried out to test his theory on linked genes, ledMorgan to postulate that the location of the genes onthe chromosomes contributes to the likelihood of anygiven gene being transmitted from parent to offspring.This theory of linear arrangement, along with Morgan’s(60)other important contributions to the field of genetics,led to his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiologyor Medicine in 1933.Current research exploring the significance oflinked genes reveals that many factors affect the trans-(65)mission of certain traits from parents to offspring. Thelocation of genes on a particular chromosome is but oneof a multitude of determinants involved in whether ornot a characteristic will be inherited.Q. According to the passage, if the genes for blue eyes and brown hair are located on the same chromosome

Direction:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageNATURAL SCIENCE: Heredity and Gene-linkage: A Possible RelationshipThe ability of every organism on earth to repro-duce is the hallmark of life. Reproduction can be eitherasexual, involving a single parent, or sexual, involvingtwo parents. Sexual reproduction begets offspring that(5)inherit half of their genes from each parent. This trans-mission of genes from one generation to the next iscalled heredity.Each hereditary unit, the gene, contains specificencoded information that translates into an organism’s(10)inherited traits. Inherited traits range from hair color,to height to susceptibility to disease. Genes are actu-ally segments of the DNA molecule, and it is theprecise replication of DNA that produces copies ofgenes that can be passed from parents to offspring.(15)DNA is subdivided into chromosomes that each includehundreds or thousands of genes. The specific traits orcharacteristics of each offspring depend on the arrange-ment and combination of the chromosomes supplied byboth parents.(20)Genes located on the same chromosome tend tobe inherited together. Transmission of these so-calledlinked genes can affect the inheritance of two dif-ferent characteristics. Thomas Hunt Morgan was thefirst biologist to associate specific genes with specific(25)chromosomes. In the early 20th century, Morganselected a species of fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster,on which to study his genetic theory. The fruit fly is aprolific breeder, producing hundreds of offspring in asingle mating. In addition, the fruit fly has only four(30)pairs of easily distinguishable chromosomes, makingit the ideal experimental organism. Soon after Morgancommenced working with Drosophila, he began tonotice variations in certain traits.For example, Morgan noticed that the natural(35)characteristics of Drosophila included gray bodiesand normal wings. However, mutant examples ofthese characteristics sometimes appeared; these flieshad black bodies, and much smaller, vestigial wings.Morgan crossed female flies that appeared normal, but(40)carried the mutant genes, with males that exhibited themutations. He expected the offspring to include equalnumbers of gray flies with normal wings, black flieswith vestigial wings, gray flies with vestigial wings,and black flies with normal wings. What he found was(45)a disproportionate number of gray flies with normalwings and black flies with vestigial wings, which sug-gested to him that the genes for body color and wingsize are transmitted together from parents to offspringbecause they are located on the same chromosome and(50)must be somehow linked.Additional research conducted by Morgan onD. melanogaster demonstrated that many, often spon-taneous mutations occur across generations. Theseobservations, together with the results of experiments(55)carried out to test his theory on linked genes, ledMorgan to postulate that the location of the genes onthe chromosomes contributes to the likelihood of anygiven gene being transmitted from parent to offspring.This theory of linear arrangement, along with Morgan’s(60)other important contributions to the field of genetics,led to his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiologyor Medicine in 1933.Current research exploring the significance oflinked genes reveals that many factors affect the trans-(65)mission of certain traits from parents to offspring. Thelocation of genes on a particular chromosome is but oneof a multitude of determinants involved in whether ornot a characteristic will be inherited.Q. What is the main idea of the last paragraph?

Direction:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageNATURAL SCIENCE: Heredity and Gene-linkage: A Possible RelationshipThe ability of every organism on earth to repro-duce is the hallmark of life. Reproduction can be eitherasexual, involving a single parent, or sexual, involvingtwo parents. Sexual reproduction begets offspring that(5)inherit half of their genes from each parent. This trans-mission of genes from one generation to the next iscalled heredity.Each hereditary unit, the gene, contains specificencoded information that translates into an organism’s(10)inherited traits. Inherited traits range from hair color,to height to susceptibility to disease. Genes are actu-ally segments of the DNA molecule, and it is theprecise replication of DNA that produces copies ofgenes that can be passed from parents to offspring.(15)DNA is subdivided into chromosomes that each includehundreds or thousands of genes. The specific traits orcharacteristics of each offspring depend on the arrange-ment and combination of the chromosomes supplied byboth parents.(20)Genes located on the same chromosome tend tobe inherited together. Transmission of these so-calledlinked genes can affect the inheritance of two dif-ferent characteristics. Thomas Hunt Morgan was thefirst biologist to associate specific genes with specific(25)chromosomes. In the early 20th century, Morganselected a species of fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster,on which to study his genetic theory. The fruit fly is aprolific breeder, producing hundreds of offspring in asingle mating. In addition, the fruit fly has only four(30)pairs of easily distinguishable chromosomes, makingit the ideal experimental organism. Soon after Morgancommenced working with Drosophila, he began tonotice variations in certain traits.For example, Morgan noticed that the natural(35)characteristics of Drosophila included gray bodiesand normal wings. However, mutant examples ofthese characteristics sometimes appeared; these flieshad black bodies, and much smaller, vestigial wings.Morgan crossed female flies that appeared normal, but(40)carried the mutant genes, with males that exhibited themutations. He expected the offspring to include equalnumbers of gray flies with normal wings, black flieswith vestigial wings, gray flies with vestigial wings,and black flies with normal wings. What he found was(45)a disproportionate number of gray flies with normalwings and black flies with vestigial wings, which sug-gested to him that the genes for body color and wingsize are transmitted together from parents to offspringbecause they are located on the same chromosome and(50)must be somehow linked.Additional research conducted by Morgan onD. melanogaster demonstrated that many, often spon-taneous mutations occur across generations. Theseobservations, together with the results of experiments(55)carried out to test his theory on linked genes, ledMorgan to postulate that the location of the genes onthe chromosomes contributes to the likelihood of anygiven gene being transmitted from parent to offspring.This theory of linear arrangement, along with Morgan’s(60)other important contributions to the field of genetics,led to his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiologyor Medicine in 1933.Current research exploring the significance oflinked genes reveals that many factors affect the trans-(65)mission of certain traits from parents to offspring. Thelocation of genes on a particular chromosome is but oneof a multitude of determinants involved in whether ornot a characteristic will be inherited.Q.The passsage states that all of the following are examples of inherited traits EXCEPT

Top Courses for ACT

Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for ACT 2025 is part of ACT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the ACT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for ACT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for ACT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for ACT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:Read the passages and choose the best answer to each question.PassageHUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from The Nature of Goodness by George Herbert Palmer ©1903My reader may well feel that goodness is alreadythe most familiar of all the thoughts we employ, and yethe may at the same time suspect that there is somethingabout it perplexingly remote. Familiar it certainly is. It(5) attends all our wishes, acts, and projects as nothingelse does, so that no estimate of its influence can beexcessive. When we take a walk, read a book, pick outa dress, visit a friend, attend a concert, cast a vote, enterinto business, we always do it in the hope of attaining(10) something good. Since they are so frequently encoun-tering goodness, both laymen and scholars are apt toassume that it is altogether clear and requires no expla-nation. But the very reverse is the truth. Familiarityobscures. It breeds instincts and not understanding. So(15) woven has goodness become with the very web of lifethat it is hard to disentangle.Consequently, we employ the word or somesynonym of it during pretty much every waking hour ofour lives. Wishing some test of this frequency I turned(20) to Shakespeare, and found that he uses the word “good”fifteen hundred times, and its derivatives “goodness,”“better,” and “best,” about as many more. He couldnot make men and women talk right without incessantreference to this concept.(25) How then do we employ the word “good”? I donot ask how we ought to employ it, but how we actuallydo. For the present, we shall be engaged in a psycho-logical inquiry, not an ethical one. We need to get atthe plain facts of usage. I will therefore ask each reader(30) to look into his own mind, see on what occasions heuses the word, and decide what meaning he attaches toit. Taking up a few of the simplest possible examples,we will through them inquire when and why we callthings good.(35) Here is a knife. When is it a good knife? Why,a knife is made for something, for cutting. Wheneverthe knife slides evenly through a piece of wood, andwith a minimum of effort on the part of him who steersit, when there is no disposition of its edge to bend or(40) break, but only to do its appointed work effectively,then we know that a good knife is at work. Or, lookingat the matter from another point of view, whenever thehandle of the knife neatly fits the hand, following itslines and presenting no obstruction, we may say that(40) in these respects also the knife is a good knife. That is,the knife becomes good through adaptation to its work,an adaptation realized in its cutting of the wood and inits conformity to the hand. Its goodness always hasreference to something outside itself, and is measured(50) by its performance of an external task.Or take something not so palpable. What gloriousweather! When we woke this morning, drew aside ourcurtains and looked out, we said “It is a good day!”And of what qualities of the day were we thinking? We(55) meant, I suppose, that the day was well fitted to itsvarious purposes. Intending to go to our office, we sawthere was nothing to hinder our doing so. We knew thatthe streets would be clear, people in an amiable mood,business and social duties would move forward easily.(60) In fact, whatever our plans, in calling the day a goodday we meant to speak of it as excellently adapted tosomething outside itself.A usage more curious still occurs in the nursery.There when the question is asked, “Has the baby(65) been good?” one discovers by degrees that the anx-ious mother wishes to know if it has been crying orquiet. This elementary life has as yet not acquiredpositive standards of measurement. It must be reckonedin negative terms, a failure to disturb.(70) This signification of goodness is lucidly put in theremark of Shakespeare’s Portia, “Nothing I see is goodwithout respect.” We must have some respect or end inmind in reference to which the goodness is compared.Good always means good “for.” That little preposition(75) cannot be absent from our minds, though it need notaudibly be uttered. The knife is good for cutting and theday for business. Omit the “for,” and goodness ceases.To be bad or good implies external reference. To begood means to be an efficient means; and the end to(80) be furthered must be already in mind before the wordgood is spoken.In short, whenever we inspect the usage of theword good, we always find behind it an implication ofsome end to be reached. Good is a relative term. The(85) good is the useful, and it must be useful for something.Silent or spoken, it is the mental reference to some-thing else which puts all meaning into it. So Hamletsays, “There’s nothing either good or bad, but thinkingmakes it so.” No new quality is added to an object or(90) act when it becomes good.Q.The author of the passage asserts that the weather and a knife are similar because:a)both are defined as good if and only if they can be helpful to many people for a variety of reasons.b)neither can be defined as good unless they remain consistent and unchanged in the wake of fluctuating circumstances.c)both are defined as good when their characteristics serve appropriate external circumstances.d)neither one can be good unless a universal definition of the concept is accepted.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice ACT tests.
Explore Courses for ACT exam

Top Courses for ACT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev