GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > A research on early language development conc...
Start Learning for Free
A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.
Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?
- a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.
- b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.
- c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a child's early language development.
- d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.
- e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves one's skills in English.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
A research on early language development concluded that children born ...
The argument in the passage states that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better English language skills by the age of 5 compared to children born in non-English-speaking countries. It further concludes that if a couple from a non-English-speaking country were to start their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better English skills than if they had stayed in their home country.
We are asked to find an option that weakens this conclusion the most. Let's analyze each option:
(a) Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.
This option directly contradicts the premise of the argument and, if true, would weaken the conclusion. However, we are looking for the option that weakens the conclusion the most, and this option does not provide any additional information or explanation.
This option directly contradicts the premise of the argument and, if true, would weaken the conclusion. However, we are looking for the option that weakens the conclusion the most, and this option does not provide any additional information or explanation.
(b) The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.
This option attacks the reliability of the research mentioned in the passage. If the research is statistically unreliable, then the conclusion based on that research becomes less convincing. However, this option does not address the specific comparison between children born in English-speaking countries and those born in non-English-speaking countries.
This option attacks the reliability of the research mentioned in the passage. If the research is statistically unreliable, then the conclusion based on that research becomes less convincing. However, this option does not address the specific comparison between children born in English-speaking countries and those born in non-English-speaking countries.
(c) The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a child's early language development.
This option weakens the conclusion by introducing another factor that may influence a child's language development: the language spoken at home. It suggests that even if the family moves to an English-speaking country, if they continue speaking their native language at home, it could impact the child's English language acquisition. This option provides an alternative explanation for the difference in language skills observed between the two groups.
This option weakens the conclusion by introducing another factor that may influence a child's language development: the language spoken at home. It suggests that even if the family moves to an English-speaking country, if they continue speaking their native language at home, it could impact the child's English language acquisition. This option provides an alternative explanation for the difference in language skills observed between the two groups.
(d) There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English-speaking countries.
This option introduces variability within both groups, indicating that language skills are not solely determined by the country of birth. While it challenges the generalization made in the conclusion, it does not specifically weaken the comparison between the two groups of children.
This option introduces variability within both groups, indicating that language skills are not solely determined by the country of birth. While it challenges the generalization made in the conclusion, it does not specifically weaken the comparison between the two groups of children.
(e. Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves one's skills in English.
This option supports the conclusion by providing a reason why children in English-speaking countries might have better English language skills. It does not weaken the argument but rather reinforces it.
This option supports the conclusion by providing a reason why children in English-speaking countries might have better English language skills. It does not weaken the argument but rather reinforces it.
Therefore, option (c) weakens the conclusion the most by introducing the importance of the language spoken at home as a crucial factor in a child's early language development, suggesting that the country of residence alone may not be the sole determining factor in language acquisition.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
A research on early language development concluded that children born ...
Understanding the Conclusion
The passage concludes that children from non-English-speaking countries will acquire better English skills if raised in an English-speaking country until age 5. This conclusion is based on the assumption that the environment significantly influences language development.
Weakening the Conclusion
To weaken this conclusion, we need to introduce a factor that suggests the environment alone may not be sufficient for language acquisition.
Option C Analysis
- The statement from option C posits that "The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a child's early language development."
- This implies that even if children are raised in an English-speaking environment, if their parents primarily speak a non-English language at home, the children's exposure to English may be limited.
Impact of Option C
- If the home language is predominantly non-English, children may not fully benefit from the English-speaking environment outside of the home.
- Thus, children may not achieve the expected level of English proficiency by age 5, contradicting the passage's conclusion.
Other Options Analysis
- Option A: Disputes the research's findings but does not address home language impact.
- Option B: Questions the reliability of the study but doesn't mitigate the environmental influence.
- Option D: Discusses individual parent proficiency but doesn't focus on the home language's effect.
- Option E: Supports the conclusion by emphasizing exposure.
Conclusion
In summary, option C effectively weakens the passage's conclusion by introducing the critical role of home language, suggesting that an English-speaking environment alone may not guarantee superior English skills if the home language differs.
The passage concludes that children from non-English-speaking countries will acquire better English skills if raised in an English-speaking country until age 5. This conclusion is based on the assumption that the environment significantly influences language development.
Weakening the Conclusion
To weaken this conclusion, we need to introduce a factor that suggests the environment alone may not be sufficient for language acquisition.
Option C Analysis
- The statement from option C posits that "The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a child's early language development."
- This implies that even if children are raised in an English-speaking environment, if their parents primarily speak a non-English language at home, the children's exposure to English may be limited.
Impact of Option C
- If the home language is predominantly non-English, children may not fully benefit from the English-speaking environment outside of the home.
- Thus, children may not achieve the expected level of English proficiency by age 5, contradicting the passage's conclusion.
Other Options Analysis
- Option A: Disputes the research's findings but does not address home language impact.
- Option B: Questions the reliability of the study but doesn't mitigate the environmental influence.
- Option D: Discusses individual parent proficiency but doesn't focus on the home language's effect.
- Option E: Supports the conclusion by emphasizing exposure.
Conclusion
In summary, option C effectively weakens the passage's conclusion by introducing the critical role of home language, suggesting that an English-speaking environment alone may not guarantee superior English skills if the home language differs.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice A research on early language development concluded that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries. Therefore, if a newly married couple from a non- English-speaking country were to begin their family in an English-speaking country and stay there until their children turn at least 5, their children are expected to acquire better skills in English than they would likely have acquired if the family had continued to stay in its home country.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Experts in early language development do not believe that children born in English-speaking countries acquire better skills in English by the age of 5 than children born in non-English-speaking countries.b)The research mentioned was carried out with only 100 children and is, therefore, statistically unreliable.c)The language spoken at home plays a crucial role in a childs early language development.d)There are some parents from non-English-speaking countries who speak better English than some parents from English- speaking countries.e)Staying in an English-speaking country gives better exposure to English than staying in a non-English-speaking country, and thus improves ones skills in English.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup