Banking Exams Exam  >  Banking Exams Questions  >  The Government has announced to lower the add... Start Learning for Free
The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.
  • a)
    Rs 40,000 crore
  • b)
    Rs 10,000 crore
  • c)
    Rs 30,000 crore
  • d)
    Rs 20,000 crore
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing require...
Explanation:

The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs 20,000 crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017. This decision has been taken due to the improved fiscal situation and the government's efforts to control the fiscal deficit.

Reasons for lowering the additional borrowing requirement:

1. Improved fiscal situation: The government has been able to improve its fiscal situation by increasing revenue through various measures such as the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and demonetization. These efforts have helped in reducing the fiscal deficit and the need for additional borrowing.

2. Control over fiscal deficit: The government has been focused on controlling the fiscal deficit, which is the difference between the government's total expenditure and its total revenue. By lowering the additional borrowing requirement, the government aims to reduce the fiscal deficit and maintain fiscal discipline.

3. Economic growth: The Indian economy has been experiencing robust growth in recent years, which has led to increased tax revenues for the government. This has reduced the need for additional borrowing to fund the government's expenditure.

4. Market conditions: The government has also taken into consideration the prevailing market conditions while deciding to lower the additional borrowing requirement. Lowering the borrowing requirement will help in maintaining stability in the financial markets.

5. Investor confidence: By reducing the additional borrowing requirement, the government aims to boost investor confidence in the Indian economy. This will attract more investments, both domestic and foreign, and contribute to the overall economic growth.

Impact of lowering the additional borrowing requirement:

1. Reduced interest burden: Lowering the additional borrowing requirement will help in reducing the interest burden on the government. This will free up funds that can be used for developmental activities and other priority areas.

2. Better debt management: By lowering the borrowing requirement, the government will be able to manage its debt more effectively. This will help in maintaining the sustainability of public finances and reduce the risk of default.

3. Positive signal to the market: The decision to lower the additional borrowing requirement sends a positive signal to the financial markets. It shows the government's commitment to fiscal discipline and stability, which is likely to be appreciated by investors.

4. Fiscal consolidation: Lowering the additional borrowing requirement is a step towards achieving fiscal consolidation. It will help in reducing the fiscal deficit and bring the government's finances on a more sustainable path.

In conclusion, the government's decision to lower the additional borrowing requirement to Rs 20,000 crore from Rs 50,000 crore is a positive step towards fiscal consolidation and maintaining stability in the financial markets. It reflects the government's efforts to control the fiscal deficit and improve the overall fiscal situation.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in underline to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.In February 2010 the Medical Council of India announced a major change in the regulation governing the establishment of medical colleges. With this change, corporate entities werepermittedto open medical colleges. The new regulation also carried the following warning: “permission shall be with-drawn if the colleges resort to commercialization”. Since the regulation does not elaborate on what constitutes “resorting to commercialisation”, this will presumably be a matter left to the discretion of the Government.A basic requirement for a new medical college is a pre-existing hospital that will serve as a teaching hospital. Corporate entities have hospitals in the major metros and that is where they will have to locate medical colleges. The earlier mandated land requirement for a medical college cam-pus, minimum of 25 acres of contiguous land, cannot be fulfilled in the metros. Not surprisingly, yet another tweak has been made in the regulation, prescribing 10 acres as the new mini-mum campus size for 9 cities including the main metros. With this, the stage is set for corporate entities to enter the medical education market.Until now, medical education in India has been projected as a not for profit activity to be organised for the public good. While private bodies can run medical colleges, these can only be societies or trusts, legally non-profit organizations. In opening the door to corporate colleges, thus, a major policy change has been effected without changing the law or even a discussion in Parliament, but by simply getting acompliantMCI to change the regulation on establishment of medical colleges. This and other changes have been justified in the name of addressing the shortage of doctors. At the same time, over 50, existing medical colleges, including 15 run by the government, have been prohibited from admitting students in 2010 for having failed to meet the basic standards prescribed. Ninety per cent of these colleges have come up in the last 5 years. Particularlyshockingis the phenomenon of government colleges falling short of standards approved by the Government. Why are state government institutions not able to meet the requirements that have been approved by the central government? A severe problem faced by government-run institutions is attracting and retaining teaching faculty, and this is likely to be among the major reasons for these colleges failing to satisfy the MCI norms. The crisis building up on the faculty front has been flagged by various commissions looking Into problems of medical education over the years.An indicator of the crisis is the attempt to conjure up faculty when MCI carries out inspections of new colleges, one of its regulatory functions. Judging by news reports, the practice of presenting fake faculty-students or private medical practitioners hired for the day -during MCI inspections in private colleges is common. What is interesting is that even government colleges are adoptingunscrupulousmethods. An-other indicator is the extraordinary scheme, verging on the ridiculous that is being put in place by the MCI to make inspections ‘foolproof. Faculty in all medical colleges are to be issued an RFID based smart card by the MCI with a unique Faculty Number. The card, it is argued, will eliminate the possibility of a teacher being shown on the faculty of more than one college and establish if the qualifications of a teacher are genuine. In the future it is projected that biometric RFID readers will be in-stalled in the colleges that will enable a Faculty Identification, Tracking and Monitoring System to monitor faculty from within the college and even remotely from MCI headquarters.The picture above does not even start to reveal the true and pathetic situation of medical care especially in rural India. Only a fraction of the doctors and nursing professionals serve rural areas where 70 per cent of our population lives. The Health Ministry, with the help of the MCI, has been active in proposing yet another ‘innovative’ solution to the problem of lack of doctors in the rural areas. The proposal is for a three-and-a-half year course to obtain the degree of Bachelor of Rural Medicine and Surgery (BRMS). Only rural candidates would be able to join this course. The study and training would happen at two different levels -Community Health Centers for 18 months, and sub-divisional hospitals for a further period of 2 years -and be conducted by retired professors. After completion of training, they would only be able to serve in their own state in district hospitals, community health centres, and primary health centres.The BRMS proposal has invited sharp criticism from some doctors’ organisations on the grounds that it is discriminatory to have two different standards of health care one for urban and the other for rural areas, and that the health care provided by such graduates will be compromised. At the other end is the opinion expressed by some that “something is better than nothing”, that since doctors do not want to serve in rural areas, the government may as well create a new cadre of medics who will be obliged to serve there. The debate will surely pick up after the government formally lays out its plans. What is apparent is that neither this proposal nor the various stopgap measures adopted so far address the root of the problem of health care. The far larger issue is government policy, the low priority attached by the government to the social sector as a whole and the health sector in particular, evidenced in the paltry allocations for maintaining and upgrading medical infrastructure and medical education and for looking after precious human resources.Q. Which of the following is/are the change/s announced by the MCI in the regulation governing the establishment of medical colleges?(

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people, excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.The court was referring to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proposed by the government, which allows a claimant for Indian citizenship to “change his legacy” by submitting additional documents at the ‘claims and objections’ stage. The court asked whether this would amount to “re-doing the claims” of those left out from the draft NRC published on July 30.A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Nariman on Tuesday said allowing a claimant to change his legacy would amount to “tinkering with the family tree” and re-doing the verification process.“You see, a claimant submits documents to prove his legacy from his father. A family tree is drawn, which includes the claimant’s siblings, etc. The authorities verify his claim with each one of the member in the family tree before deciding his claim [for citizenship]. Now, your SOP says that a person can submit fresh documents claiming to prove his legacy from his grandfather. Now, the family tree has to be recreated. Everything has to be re-verified. This amounts to redoing the entire exercise. Why?”, Justice Gogoi asked Attorney General K.K. Venugopal.Besides, the Bench pointed out, the government, in the beginning, had specified that documents on legacy would be allowed to be filed only once. Now, it has changed tack to permit additional documents to be filed. “Are you not contradicting yourself here?” Justice Gogoi asked Mr. Venugopal.The court directed Assam State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela to file a report on the ramifications of the government's proposal to submit fresh documents. Mr. Hajela has to file his report before September 5, the next date of hearing.Meanwhile, the court deferred the receipt of claims and objections to a later date. This stage was supposed to start within the next days, on August 30, and would have continued till October 28.“Allowing a person to suddenly pull out an additional document, that too at the 'claims and objections' stage, will upset the apple cart,” Justice Nariman observed.Mr. Venugopal countered that the government is giving “another chance to people who risk losing all their rights”.To this, Justice Nariman agreed that the court was dealing with “human problems of a huge magnitude”.“Consequences are so severe that should they be given one more chance. Suppose a claimant has misfired once but can deliver in the next. Why should such a person not be given another chance?” Justice Nariman asked Mr. Hajela, stakeholders and petitioners in the litigation.To this, Mr. Hajela said reopening of family trees would risk the possibility of “trading of legacies or meeting of minds”. "Giving a second chance would only open trading in legacies. There may be people who are willing to sell the legacies to others,” he said.The Supreme Court further asked Mr. Hajela to submit a report with a time-frame to carry out the sample re-verification of at least 10 per cent of the names included in the final draft NRC. This is after Mr. Hajela placed before the Bench a district-wise data of the percentage of the population who have been excluded from the final draft NRC.Which among the following is true regarding the view of the Supreme Court regarding the Standard Operating Procedure announced by the government?

The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2025 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Government has announced to lower the additional borrowing requirement for the current fiscal to Rs _____ crore from Rs 50,000 crore as estimated in December 2017.a)Rs 40,000 croreb)Rs 10,000 crorec)Rs 30,000 crored)Rs 20,000 croreCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Top Courses for Banking Exams

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev