Question Description
A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for MCAT 2024 is part of MCAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the MCAT exam syllabus. Information about A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for MCAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for MCAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for MCAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A 19th century scientist investigates cell growth by placing boiled broth in one Erlenmeyer flask and non-boiled broth in another flask. The scientist covered both flasks so that air could not enter the flasks and observed the flasks for two weeks. Neither flask grew any biological matter. From this the scientist concluded that abiogenesis or spontaneous generation was an invalid theory.Select the best evaluation of the above experiment and conclusiona)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because living objects often require air to grow regardless if their origin was spontaneous or not.b)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because cells can only grow from other cells.c)Since no colonies of cells grew in either flask, the conclusion is a valid conclusion because spontaneous generation predicts that cells should grow spontaneously.d)The conclusion is an invalid conclusion because the scientist did not wait long enough for anaerobic cells to grow in the broth.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice MCAT tests.