Question Description
Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Climate change mitigation strategies are often evaluated based on their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, a deeper analysis reveals hidden costs that are seldom accounted for in initial assessments. These costs are multifaceted, encompassing not only economic factors but also social and ecological dimensions.One such hidden cost is the social displacement caused by large-scale renewable energy projects. For instance, the construction of massive solar farms often requires significant land use, which can lead to the displacement of local communities and the disruption of their livelihoods. Similarly, biofuel production has been linked to deforestation and the conversion of agricultural land, affecting food security and biodiversity.Another hidden cost is the economic burden on consumers. While the long-term benefits of climate change mitigation are clear, the short-term costs can be substantial. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy may involve upfront investments that are passed on to consumers, leading to higher energy prices and living costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households.Furthermore, the ecological costs of some mitigation strategies are not always evident. For example, the production of electric vehicles (EVs) involves mining for lithium and cobalt, which can have significant environmental impacts. The disposal of EV batteries also poses challenges in terms of recycling and waste management.Recognizing these hidden costs is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable climate change mitigation strategies. Policymakers must balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the need to address the broader implications of mitigation efforts.Q.What does the passage imply about the evaluation of climate change mitigation strategies?a)They are often overestimated in terms of their effectiveness.b)They are typically assessed without considering hidden costs.c)They are always economically beneficial in the short term.d)They invariably lead to social displacement and ecological damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.