All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage and ans... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devil's Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between nature's flora and fauna.

Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.

The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.

The "Devil's Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planet's biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that nature's workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.
Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?
  • a)
    The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.
  • b)
    The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.
  • c)
    The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devil's Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.
  • d)
    The "Devil's Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that fol...
The passage does not support the claim that indigenous farming practices are responsible for the dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees. Instead, it attributes this phenomenon to the relationship between the tree and the ants.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. The passage suggests that the "Devils Garden" is significant because

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. What is the primary focus of the passage?

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. According to the passage, the discovery of the relationship between the tree and the ants has led scientists to

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The global climate change debate has gone badly wrong. Many mainstream environmentalists are arguing for the wrong actions and for the wrong reasons, and so long as they continue to do so they put all our futures in jeopardy. My diagnosis is a twofold ethical failure: of pragmatism and perspective (or, more eloquently, of ‘sense and sensibility’). Many environmentalists argue that climate change is fundamentally a values problem. And yet their interpretation of this has taken a narrow moralising form that systematically excludes consideration of such important ethical values as improving the lives of the 1 billion people presently living in unacceptable poverty or even protecting other aspects of the environment (such as wilderness areas). That narrowness also leads to self-defeating policy proposals founded almost entirely in the economy of nature rather than political economy. The result is a fixation on global CO2 levels alone as the problem and solution, at the cost of systematic and broad evaluation of the feasible policy space. These foundational errors have induced a kind of millenarian meltdown in many otherwise sensible people, to the extent that to be an environmentalist these days is to fear the oncoming storm and know that all hope is lost. To put it mildly, people in this state of mind are not well placed to contribute helpfully to the political debate about what we should do about the fact of climate change. In their reconciliation with despair environmentalists are not only mistaken, but display a disturbing symmetry with those opponents of action who are mistakenly complacent about the status quo. My recommended treatment, to reinvigorate their confidence as well as their ethics, is a dose of economic reasoning.It is clearly a scientific fact that the worlds regional climates are changing substantially and at unprecedented speed as a result of the global warming produced by the greenhouse gases emitted by human activity (in particular by the industrialisation of the West). But science does not have the legitimacy or resources to tell us what we should do about climate change. We have to work out for ourselves, through public reasoning and politics, the implications of scientific facts for what we have reason to value, and what to do about them. As well as incorporating the full range of our ethical concerns and values (sensibility) such a debate requires further facts about how our socio-economic institutions interact with the environmental mechanisms (sens e). Relying on the natural scientific account alone leads us to fixate on the minutiae of greenhouse gas emissions levels and climate sensitivity, while drastically simplifying the human side.It is often said, and very plausibly, that climate change is difficult for human minds and political institutions to grasp and act on because it’s global scale and long-term (inter-generational) and complex causal mechanisms present a perfect moral storm (e.g. Stephen Gardiner). One way of dealing with such difficult problems is to moralise them, and this seems to be the strategy currently favoured by mainstream environmentalists. Climate change is thus simplified and personalised as a simple ‘values’ choice: Are you for the planet or against it? Morality in this sense concerns strict but simple universal rules that everyone should follow without regard to personal situations or consequences - on the model of laws. On this model, ones carbon footprint is a moral crime (against the planet presumably) which one should feel guilty about and strive to reduce. As of course are other peoples carbon emissions: they deserve to be shamed or otherwise forced into submission by the righteous ones.In trying to tackle climate change by directly dealing with the causal mechanism of CO2 levels we have framed the situation as an enormous collective action problem - how to persuade 7 billion people to adopt the new morality of carbon rationing (and prevent free-riding). Everyone who thinks this through recognises that it is impossible to realise without enormous government coercion (severe rationing along the lines of Chinas one-child policy). That requirement explains many climate change warriors antipathy to democratic principles on this point - it seems easier to persuade all 200 governments to be adopt carbon authoritarianism than to persuade all those people individually (e.g. James Lovelock). However even the government coercion approach fails - see the failures of every inter-governmental treaty, from Kyoto to Copenhagen - and the reasons are obvious.The moralisation approach undermines itself since it frames climate change narrowly in terms of righteousness. Inevitably deliberation about action gets bogged down in an interminable blame-game about what justice requires - who had their industrial revolution first, etc. Furthermore, the moral duties of different actors do not all point the same way: poor country governments have a clear and over-riding moral duty to help their citizens achieve the high quality of life which the West takes for granted, and which is inevitably energy (carbon) intensive. And then there is the practical economics: the world still has lots of coal, especially in the poor world, that can produce electricity at 3c per kwh (which renewables cannot possibly compete with without radical technological breakthroughs, even with the strongest moral rhetori c). No comprehensive global political solution to greenhouse gases is possible. We need to go back and think again.Q.Para phrase the line:Relying on the natural scientific account alone leads us to fixate on the minutiae of greenhouse gas emissions levels and climate sensitivity, while drastically simplifying the human side.

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The global climate change debate has gone badly wrong. Many mainstream environmentalists are arguing for the wrong actions and for the wrong reasons, and so long as they continue to do so they put all our futures in jeopardy. My diagnosis is a twofold ethical failure: of pragmatism and perspective (or, more eloquently, of ‘sense and sensibility’). Many environmentalists argue that climate change is fundamentally a values problem. And yet their interpretation of this has taken a narrow moralising form that systematically excludes consideration of such important ethical values as improving the lives of the 1 billion people presently living in unacceptable poverty or even protecting other aspects of the environment (such as wilderness areas). That narrowness also leads to self-defeating policy proposals founded almost entirely in the economy of nature rather than political economy. The result is a fixation on global CO2 levels alone as the problem and solution, at the cost of systematic and broad evaluation of the feasible policy space. These foundational errors have induced a kind of millenarian meltdown in many otherwise sensible people, to the extent that to be an environmentalist these days is to fear the oncoming storm and know that all hope is lost. To put it mildly, people in this state of mind are not well placed to contribute helpfully to the political debate about what we should do about the fact of climate change. In their reconciliation with despair environmentalists are not only mistaken, but display a disturbing symmetry with those opponents of action who are mistakenly complacent about the status quo. My recommended treatment, to reinvigorate their confidence as well as their ethics, is a dose of economic reasoning.It is clearly a scientific fact that the worlds regional climates are changing substantially and at unprecedented speed as a result of the global warming produced by the greenhouse gases emitted by human activity (in particular by the industrialisation of the West). But science does not have the legitimacy or resources to tell us what we should do about climate change. We have to work out for ourselves, through public reasoning and politics, the implications of scientific facts for what we have reason to value, and what to do about them. As well as incorporating the full range of our ethical concerns and values (sensibility) such a debate requires further facts about how our socio-economic institutions interact with the environmental mechanisms (sens e). Relying on the natural scientific account alone leads us to fixate on the minutiae of greenhouse gas emissions levels and climate sensitivity, while drastically simplifying the human side.It is often said, and very plausibly, that climate change is difficult for human minds and political institutions to grasp and act on because it’s global scale and long-term (inter-generational) and complex causal mechanisms present a perfect moral storm (e.g. Stephen Gardiner). One way of dealing with such difficult problems is to moralise them, and this seems to be the strategy currently favoured by mainstream environmentalists. Climate change is thus simplified and personalised as a simple ‘values’ choice: Are you for the planet or against it? Morality in this sense concerns strict but simple universal rules that everyone should follow without regard to personal situations or consequences - on the model of laws. On this model, ones carbon footprint is a moral crime (against the planet presumably) which one should feel guilty about and strive to reduce. As of course are other peoples carbon emissions: they deserve to be shamed or otherwise forced into submission by the righteous ones.In trying to tackle climate change by directly dealing with the causal mechanism of CO2 levels we have framed the situation as an enormous collective action problem - how to persuade 7 billion people to adopt the new morality of carbon rationing (and prevent free-riding). Everyone who thinks this through recognises that it is impossible to realise without enormous government coercion (severe rationing along the lines of Chinas one-child policy). That requirement explains many climate change warriors antipathy to democratic principles on this point - it seems easier to persuade all 200 governments to be adopt carbon authoritarianism than to persuade all those people individually (e.g. James Lovelock). However even the government coercion approach fails - see the failures of every inter-governmental treaty, from Kyoto to Copenhagen - and the reasons are obvious.The moralisation approach undermines itself since it frames climate change narrowly in terms of righteousness. Inevitably deliberation about action gets bogged down in an interminable blame-game about what justice requires - who had their industrial revolution first, etc. Furthermore, the moral duties of different actors do not all point the same way: poor country governments have a clear and over-riding moral duty to help their citizens achieve the high quality of life which the West takes for granted, and which is inevitably energy (carbon) intensive. And then there is the practical economics: the world still has lots of coal, especially in the poor world, that can produce electricity at 3c per kwh (which renewables cannot possibly compete with without radical technological breakthroughs, even with the strongest moral rhetori c). No comprehensive global political solution to greenhouse gases is possible. We need to go back and think again.Q.The author would agree with which of the following statements:I. The speed at which the climate change is being witnessed presently has not been seen before.II. Climate change arguments are often dumbed down to the simplistic levels of a yes or no question.III. Climate change cannot be confined to a narrow framework based on righteousness.

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In the heart of the Amazon rainforest, a botanical enigma has piqued the interest of scientists and environmentalists alike. This enigma is the "Devils Garden," a peculiar patch of land where only one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta, seems to thrive, while all others are conspicuously absent. For years, this anomaly baffled researchers, prompting theories ranging from soil peculiarities to indigenous farming practices. However, recent studies have shed light on a rather astonishing interplay between natures flora and fauna.Upon closer examination, scientists discovered that the Duroia hirsuta tree has an unlikely ally: the Myrmelachista schumanni ant. These ants form a mutualistic relationship with the tree, wherein the tree provides nectar from its stems, which is not found in any other species in the area. In return, the ants protect the tree from encroaching plant species by deploying a potent herbicide secreted from their bodies, effectively creating a botanical monoculture around their home.The discovery of this relationship has profound implications for our understanding of mutualism and its impact on biodiversity. It raises the question of whether human intervention in preserving biodiversity should take into account such complex natural relationships, which can sometimes lead to the dominance of a single species over others in a given area. This phenomenon also highlights the delicate balance ecosystems maintain, which can be easily disrupted by external factors.The "Devils Garden" serves as a microcosm of the larger issues facing our planets biodiversity. As the world grapples with environmental changes and human encroachment, the survival of such unique and intricate ecosystems hangs in the balance. It reminds us that natures workings are far more complex and interconnected than they appear, and preserving biodiversity requires a deep understanding of these relationships.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?a)The Duroia hirsuta tree provides nectar from its stems exclusively to Myrmelachista schumanni ants.b)The Myrmelachista schumanni ants deploy a natural herbicide to protect Duroia hirsuta trees.c)The dominance of Duroia hirsuta trees in the "Devils Garden" is a result of indigenous farming practices.d)The "Devils Garden" is an example of a botanical monoculture.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup