CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage and ans... Start Learning for Free
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.

Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the town's economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.

Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the town's identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the town's economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.

The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.
Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?
  • a)
    A survey reveals that the majority of the town's youth would return if there were more job opportunities.
  • b)
    A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.
  • c)
    A report indicates a significant increase in the town's tourism revenue over the past year.
  • d)
    An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that fol...
The proponents' main argument is based on the need for economic revival and job creation to prevent the youth from leaving. If a survey indicates that the majority of the town's youth would return for more job opportunities, it would support the proponents' claim that the industrial plant is necessary for economic growth and retention of the youth, thus strengthening their argument.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. The primary purpose of this passage is to

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. According to the passage, which of the following is a concern of those opposing the industrial plant?

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. The author implies that the town council members

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the given question. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering the question.Technological change is recognised as one of the main drivers of long-term growth. In the coming decades, radical innovations such as mobile internet and cloud computing are likely to revolutionise production processes, particularly in developing countries.It is undebatable that technology makes production processes more efficient, thereby increasing the competitiveness of countries and reducing their vulnerability to market fluctuations. Structural change, i.e. the transition from a labour-intensive to a technology-intensive economy, drives economic upgrading. Low income countries thus acquire the necessary capabilities to catch up and reduce the gap with per capita incomes in high income countries.Catching up, unfortunately, does not occur frequently. In the last 50 years, only a few countries were successful in rapidly industrialising and achieving sustained economic growth. Technology was always a key driver in these cases and they successfully developed an advanced technology-intensive industry.Though technology is linked to sustainable growth, it is uncertain whether it can simultaneously create social inclusiveness and environmental sustainability. Technological change also requires the labour force to be prepared to use increasingly complex machinery and equipment, which widens the inequality between highly skilled and unskilled workers in terms of wage distribution. Industrialisation has historically been accompanied by increasing pollution and the depletion of natural resources. Economic growth also entails a rise in the use of inputs, materials and fossil fuels, which generate environmental pollution and degradation, especially in low income countries.From an economic point of view, globalisation and the fragmentation of production at international level have facilitated the diffusion of new technologies through the intensification of trade in sophisticated manufacturing goods. However, this diffusion of technology has in many cases not translated into concrete growth opportunities due to the lack of technological capabilities and the capacity of countries to promote innovation systems. Innovation needs to be supported by appropriate interventions that strengthen the process from technology invention to adoption by firms as was the case in benchmark countries such as China and the Republic of Korea.Even though technology and automation generally improve people's working conditions, the number of jobs may decrease as a result, with workers being replaced by machines. But, the technological change itself can mitigate this effect. New technologies also generate new markets, for example the waste and recycling industry, reduce the prices of consumer goods and provide opportunities for new investments with higher levels of profitability. Most importantly, the expansion of new technologically-intensive industries absorbs those workers who have lost their jobs to machines.Despite these positive dynamics, the current trend of technological change does not guarantee that we will follow a sustainable path in the future.Q. According to the passage, which of the following is a key benefit of adopting technology?

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow: The only thing worse than being lied to is not knowing you’re being lied to. It’s true that plastic pollution is a huge problem, of planetary proportions. And it’s true we could all do more to reduce our plastic footprint. The lie is that blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it.Recycling plastic is to saving the Earth what hammering a nail is to halting a falling skyscraper. You struggle to find a place to do it and feel pleased when you succeed. But your effort is wholly inadequate and distracts from the real problem of why the building is collapsing in the first place. The real problem is that single-use plastic—the very idea of producing plastic items like grocery bags, which we use for an average of 12 minutes but can persist in the environment for half a millennium—is an incredibly reckless abuse of technology.Encouraging individuals to recycle more will never solve the problem of a massive production of single-use plastic that should have been avoided in the first place.As an ecologist and evolutionary biologist, I have had a disturbing window into the accumulating literature on the hazards of plastic pollution. Scientists have long recognized that plastics biodegrade slowly, if at all, and pose multiple threats to wildlife through entanglement and consumption. More recent reports highlight dangers posed by absorption of toxic chemicals in the water and by plastic odors that mimic some species’ natural food. Plastics also accumulate up the food chain, and studies now show that we are likely ingesting it ourselves in seafood. . . .Beginning in the 1950s, big beverage companies like Coca-Cola and Anheuser-Busch, along with Phillip Morris and others, formed a nonprofit called Keep America Beautiful. Its mission is/was to educate and encourage environmental stewardship in the public.... At face value, these efforts seem benevolent, but they obscure the real problem, which is the role that corporate polluters play in the plastic problem. This clever misdirection has led journalist and author Heather Rogers to describe Keep America Beautiful as the first corporate greenwashing front, as it has helped shift the public focus to consumer recycling behavior and actively thwarted legislation that would increase extended producer responsibility for waste management.... The greatest success of Keep America Beautiful has been to shift the onus of environmental responsibility onto the public while simultaneously becoming a trusted name in the environmental movement....So what can we do to make responsible use of plastic a reality? First: reject the lie. Litterbugs are not responsible for the global ecological disaster of plastic. Humans can only function to the best of their abilities, given time, mental bandwidth and systemic constraints. Our huge problem with plastic is the result of a permissive legal framework that has allowed the uncontrolled rise of plastic pollution, despite clear evidence of the harm it causes to local communities and the world’s oceans. Recycling is also too hard in most parts of the U.S. and lacks the proper incentives to make it work well.Q. It can be inferred that the author considers the Keep America Beautiful organisation

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev