All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage and ans... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.

Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the town's economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.

Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the town's identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the town's economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.

The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.
Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?
  • a)
    A survey reveals that the majority of the town's youth would return if there were more job opportunities.
  • b)
    A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.
  • c)
    A report indicates a significant increase in the town's tourism revenue over the past year.
  • d)
    An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that fol...
The proponents' main argument is based on the need for economic revival and job creation to prevent the youth from leaving. If a survey indicates that the majority of the town's youth would return for more job opportunities, it would support the proponents' claim that the industrial plant is necessary for economic growth and retention of the youth, thus strengthening their argument.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. The primary purpose of this passage is to

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. The author implies that the town council members

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. According to the passage, which of the following is a concern of those opposing the industrial plant?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the given question. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering the question.Technological change is recognised as one of the main drivers of long-term growth. In the coming decades, radical innovations such as mobile internet and cloud computing are likely to revolutionise production processes, particularly in developing countries.It is undebatable that technology makes production processes more efficient, thereby increasing the competitiveness of countries and reducing their vulnerability to market fluctuations. Structural change, i.e. the transition from a labour-intensive to a technology-intensive economy, drives economic upgrading. Low income countries thus acquire the necessary capabilities to catch up and reduce the gap with per capita incomes in high income countries.Catching up, unfortunately, does not occur frequently. In the last 50 years, only a few countries were successful in rapidly industrialising and achieving sustained economic growth. Technology was always a key driver in these cases and they successfully developed an advanced technology-intensive industry.Though technology is linked to sustainable growth, it is uncertain whether it can simultaneously create social inclusiveness and environmental sustainability. Technological change also requires the labour force to be prepared to use increasingly complex machinery and equipment, which widens the inequality between highly skilled and unskilled workers in terms of wage distribution. Industrialisation has historically been accompanied by increasing pollution and the depletion of natural resources. Economic growth also entails a rise in the use of inputs, materials and fossil fuels, which generate environmental pollution and degradation, especially in low income countries.From an economic point of view, globalisation and the fragmentation of production at international level have facilitated the diffusion of new technologies through the intensification of trade in sophisticated manufacturing goods. However, this diffusion of technology has in many cases not translated into concrete growth opportunities due to the lack of technological capabilities and the capacity of countries to promote innovation systems. Innovation needs to be supported by appropriate interventions that strengthen the process from technology invention to adoption by firms as was the case in benchmark countries such as China and the Republic of Korea.Even though technology and automation generally improve people's working conditions, the number of jobs may decrease as a result, with workers being replaced by machines. But, the technological change itself can mitigate this effect. New technologies also generate new markets, for example the waste and recycling industry, reduce the prices of consumer goods and provide opportunities for new investments with higher levels of profitability. Most importantly, the expansion of new technologically-intensive industries absorbs those workers who have lost their jobs to machines.Despite these positive dynamics, the current trend of technological change does not guarantee that we will follow a sustainable path in the future.Q. According to the passage, which of the following is a key benefit of adopting technology?

Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.Scientists recently declared that the evidence is compelling enough to say that humanitys impact on the Earths atmosphere, oceans and wildlife has pushed the world into the new epoch.Britain is a world leader on the environment and has played a pivotal role in the European Union on this issue since 1986, when Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act, which established the EUs competence in this area. Yet the impact that leaving the EU would have on the UKs environmental standards rarely features in discussions. The evidence so far is clear: families in Britain, rivers, beaches and special places would pay the price if UK voted to leave.In 1995, under the last Conservative government, the UK was dirty man of Europe. Some 83% of the household waste went to landfill and just 7% was recycled or composted. By 2014, thanks to a series of EU directives, the UKs recycling rate had reached 45%.The UK currently recycles 90% of construction materials, well ahead of other countries. The Birds and Habitats Directives enabled bird and carnivore species to recover. The Natura 2000 Directive obliges the UK government to provide protected nature zones. Renewable energy capacity is growing, thanks to national targets set by the EU Renewable Energy Directive. In 2013, 15% of electricity produced in the UK came from renewable sources. Not only is the carbon footprint shrinking, it has created opportunities for renewable energy companies to grow. EU environmental legislation allows the phasing out of inefficient lightbulbs on an EU-wide basis. Also, higher standards on new car efficiency help lower fuel costs. Such strong regulations allow monitoring of environmental standards and tracking deviations. All this progress is at risk if the UK votes to leave. Anyone who thinks the environment will be better off if UK left the EU should take a long hard look at the Tory record.The Tories have talked green but acted blue.The Chinese and Indian governments have invited the European commission to help them to clean up their water and air. The EU now has global expertise in the environment. The evidence is clear. The EU has more influence globally with the UK as a member. Andas a member, UK has more influence globally. UKs voice in the Paris climate change talks was amplified because it is a part of a club of 28 countries. Leaving would mean implementing EU environment law without a seat at the table and a vote in decisions. When the UK can lead from the inside, why would it walk away? Ensuring the UK has a cleaner, greener future relies on the EU membership. Anyone who argues otherwise will be on the wrong side of history.Q.Which of the following is true in regard to UKs exit from the EU?

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:In a small town nestled in the mountains, a debate has ignited among its inhabitants. The town, known for its pristine environment and a community of avid gardeners, faces a dilemma: a proposed construction of a large-scale industrial plant that promises economic growth but threatens to disrupt the ecological balance. As the town council prepares to vote on the proposal, two camps have emerged with fervent supporters on each side.Proponents of the industrial plant argue that the towns economy has stagnated for years, and the plant would bring much-needed jobs and revenue. They point to the declining population, especially among the youth, who leave in search of better opportunities. They believe that the environmental impact can be mitigated and that the town cannot afford to pass up this chance for revival.Opponents, however, fear the irreversible damage to the environment and the potential loss of the towns identity as a haven for nature lovers. They emphasize the importance of preserving the unique flora and fauna, the potential health risks associated with industrial pollution, and the disruption to the local ecosystem. They also argue that the towns economy can be bolstered by promoting ecotourism and leveraging its natural beauty, rather than relying on industrialization.The debate has reached a fever pitch, with both sides lobbying the town council members, who find themselves torn between the promise of economic prosperity and the responsibility to safeguard the environment. As the day of the vote approaches, tensions rise, friendships strain, and the future of the town hangs in the balance.Q. Which of the following hypothetical scenarios would strengthen the argument of the proponents of the industrial plant?a)A survey reveals that the majority of the towns youth would return if there were more job opportunities.b)A neighboring town successfully integrates industrial development with environmental conservation.c)A report indicates a significant increase in the towns tourism revenue over the past year.d)An environmental study predicts minimal impact of the industrial plant on the local ecosystem.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup