CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the passage and answer the q... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.
Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?
The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some ''cunning demon'' who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.
We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?
It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those 'inner borders' of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no 'cunning demon' can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.
I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.
Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes' claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?
  • a)
    When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.
  • b)
    Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.
  • c)
    Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.
  • d)
    All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene ...
The only contradiction to Descartes' claim about reality is option 4 as it aptly describes the author's point of view. The author in the third paragraph takes each of the senses and describes how each of them makes our perception real. He states, "Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?" All the other options do not explain why Descartes' reasoning is unjustified. Option 1 is too narrow and just relates with the concept of dieting, so it is incorrect. Option 2 is also very specific and does not provide us the greater reason why the author believes that Descartes' claim is "unjustified and unreasonable". Option 3 is also very specific and stated in the very first line of the third paragraph. Hence, incorrect.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene ...
Understanding the Author's Perspective
The author of the passage critiques Descartes' skepticism regarding the reliability of human perception. Descartes questions whether what we perceive is real or merely a dream, suggesting that our senses might deceive us.
Reasons for the Critique
- The author feels that such doubt is "unjustified and unreasonable" because:
- Trust in Senses: The author emphasizes that human beings were endowed with five senses for a purpose, implying that these senses are fundamentally trustworthy.
- Reality of Perception: The belief that perceptions reflect reality is central to the author’s argument. They assert that denying the truth of our senses undermines the very essence of human experience.
- Choice to Believe: The author posits that individuals naturally gravitate toward beliefs that affirm their experiences. This belief reinforces the idea that what we perceive is valid and should not be constantly doubted.
Conclusion
In summary, the author advocates for a perspective that embraces the reliability of human senses, asserting that it is unreasonable to perpetually question their validity. Instead, they encourage acceptance of sensory experiences as truthful reflections of reality, thereby rejecting Descartes' radical skepticism. This belief aligns with the idea that our perceptions, while not infallible, form the foundation of our understanding of the world.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. The author says the following about inner borders EXCEPT

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Which one of the following statements best describes the crux of the passage?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. According to the passage, which of the following problems did Descartes focus on inMeditations on First Philosophy?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.Classical and New Age (alternativ e) music are often promoted for relaxation and stress relief. A Google search for "Mozart and relaxation" yielded 39,700 hits, while a search for "New Age music and relaxation" yielded 16,200 hits. But what are the specific psychological effects of these popular forms of music? We approached this question from the perspective of ABC (Attentional Behavioral Cognitive) relaxation theory, a comprehensive and empirically-based approach to understanding a wide range of relaxation activities.Smith has proposed that different approaches to relaxation have different positive psychological effects. In developing his perspective, Smith examined over 200 texts for a wide range of relaxation activities (progressive muscle relaxation, autogenie training, yoga, breathing exercises, imagery, creative visualization, tai chi, self-hypnosis, meditation, contemplation, and prayer) and developed an initial lexicon of 400 relaxation-related terms. Through item screening and a series of eight separate factor analytic studies, involving a combined sample of 2,616 participants, Smith and his colleagues identified what are currently relaxation state (R-State) categories: Sleepiness, Disengagement , Rested/Refreshed, Energized, Physical Relaxation, At ease/Peace, Joy, Mental Quiet, Childlike Innocence, Thankfulness and Love, Mystery, Awe and Wonder, Prayerfulness, and Timeless/Boundless/Infinite. The fifteenth R-State, Aware, is a metastate that can either exist alone or in combination with other states. Note that most research has combined two highly correlated R-States, Energized and Aware, into a single variable, Strength and Awareness.Music researchers frequently examine only self reports of "relaxation." ABC relaxation theory and research suggests this is not sufficient. "Relaxation" is only one of 15 factor dimensions of positive relaxation-related experience that may contribute to reduced stress. To elaborate, factor analytic studies show that self-reported "relaxation" consistently and highly loads on one R-State-"At ease/Peace." In other words, individuals who claim to feel "relaxed" are in fact reporting high levels of R-State At ease/Peace. Conversely, those who report a type of relaxation or music not to be relaxing, may in fact be experiencing other R-States, for example Disengagement, Mental Quiet, or Mystery. These R-States may well have important clinical applications.The importance of examining R-States other than "relaxation" becomes clear when we examine complete literature on ABC relaxation theory. To date, over 35 studies involving over 10,000 participants have examined the differences and commonalities of over 40 various approaches to relaxation. Practitioners of progressive muscle relaxation often recall feeling R-States Disengagement and Physical Relaxation. Practitioners of yoga stretching recall Strength and Awareness. Meditators experience Mental Quiet. However, little research has examined R-States associated with listening to music. Ritchie, Holmes, and Alien and Lewis found that those who select music as their preferred form of passive relaxation consistently recall feeling Joy as well as Strength and Awareness while listening to music. However, these were retrospective studies and the type of music was not identified. And, as we have noted, other music researchers have generally limited their attention to types of music that appear to evoke self-reported "relaxation".Q. The primary purpose of the passage is to

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.Classical and New Age (alternativ e) music are often promoted for relaxation and stress relief. A Google search for "Mozart and relaxation" yielded 39,700 hits, while a search for "New Age music and relaxation" yielded 16,200 hits. But what are the specific psychological effects of these popular forms of music? We approached this question from the perspective of ABC (Attentional Behavioral Cognitive) relaxation theory, a comprehensive and empirically-based approach to understanding a wide range of relaxation activities.Smith has proposed that different approaches to relaxation have different positive psychological effects. In developing his perspective, Smith examined over 200 texts for a wide range of relaxation activities (progressive muscle relaxation, autogenie training, yoga, breathing exercises, imagery, creative visualization, tai chi, self-hypnosis, meditation, contemplation, and prayer) and developed an initial lexicon of 400 relaxation-related terms. Through item screening and a series of eight separate factor analytic studies, involving a combined sample of 2,616 participants, Smith and his colleagues identified what are currently relaxation state (R-State) categories: Sleepiness, Disengagement , Rested/Refreshed, Energized, Physical Relaxation, At ease/Peace, Joy, Mental Quiet, Childlike Innocence, Thankfulness and Love, Mystery, Awe and Wonder, Prayerfulness, and Timeless/Boundless/Infinite. The fifteenth R-State, Aware, is a metastate that can either exist alone or in combination with other states. Note that most research has combined two highly correlated R-States, Energized and Aware, into a single variable, Strength and Awareness.Music researchers frequently examine only self reports of "relaxation." ABC relaxation theory and research suggests this is not sufficient. "Relaxation" is only one of 15 factor dimensions of positive relaxation-related experience that may contribute to reduced stress. To elaborate, factor analytic studies show that self-reported "relaxation" consistently and highly loads on one R-State-"At ease/Peace." In other words, individuals who claim to feel "relaxed" are in fact reporting high levels of R-State At ease/Peace. Conversely, those who report a type of relaxation or music not to be relaxing, may in fact be experiencing other R-States, for example Disengagement, Mental Quiet, or Mystery. These R-States may well have important clinical applications.The importance of examining R-States other than "relaxation" becomes clear when we examine complete literature on ABC relaxation theory. To date, over 35 studies involving over 10,000 participants have examined the differences and commonalities of over 40 various approaches to relaxation. Practitioners of progressive muscle relaxation often recall feeling R-States Disengagement and Physical Relaxation. Practitioners of yoga stretching recall Strength and Awareness. Meditators experience Mental Quiet. However, little research has examined R-States associated with listening to music. Ritchie, Holmes, and Alien and Lewis found that those who select music as their preferred form of passive relaxation consistently recall feeling Joy as well as Strength and Awareness while listening to music. However, these were retrospective studies and the type of music was not identified. And, as we have noted, other music researchers have generally limited their attention to types of music that appear to evoke self-reported "relaxation".Q. None of the following can be unmistakably inferred from the first paragraph of the passageEXCEPT

Top Courses for CAT

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Rene Descartes arrived at certain fundamental principles that could be undoubtedly considered as true by questioning everything. In his Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes focused on the problem of distinguishing between wakefulness and dreaming. How can we say what reality is if there is the possibility that we are simply dreaming it?The French philosopher argues that there is no reliable sign to tell when we are dreaming, and when we are in fact experiencing reality. Being deeply religious, the philosopher goes on to suggest that this might be a trick of some cunning demon who tries to deceive naive souls by leading them to believe that whatever is around them is real which, in fact, is a false assumption. The question that Descartes raised roughly four hundred years ago has puzzled me and caused me to question whether it is at all rational to doubt everything we perceive through hearing, seeing, touching, tasting, and smelling. To me, such a superfluous discretion is rather unjustified and unreasonable.We believe what we want to believe. When we choose to believe or doubt, we do it for a reason that we might not admit to ourselves or others, but there is always a reason. Thus, when we cannot think of a reason not to trust our senses, then why should we doubt it?It is no secret that what we believe has every chance of becoming true, even if it is not already in our perceived reality. Visualization techniques, psychological training, and gestalt therapy classes that have gained tremendous popularity in the past 20-25 years all teach us to control what we think, to focus on positive thinking, and to demolish those inner borders of our conscience that tell us our dreams are impossible to achieve, our skills are limited, and our opportunities are few. Let us choose to believe the opposite, and not doubt the possibility of us being the masters of our lives, so that no cunning demon can distract us with false perceptions and throw us off the right path.I think it is against the nature of our body and mind to doubt our own senses at every point in time. We were created with the five senses for a reason, whether it was by God, by nature, or some other supernatural force. It is difficult to doubt the fact that we function the way we function, and perceive the way we perceive. Let us admit that there is information that humanity does not know, millions of discoveries are yet to be made, and much more that remains undiscovered by us. Does that make our lives pointless? I do not think so. I choose to believe that what I perceive is true and what I sense is trustworthy.Q. Why does the author of the passage feel that Descartes claim was "unjustified and unreasonable"?a)When we deprive ourselves of something, it is to get something we desire.b)Whether we choose to believe or doubt, there is always a reason for it.c)Human beings believe what they want to believe and cannot be deceived.d)All human perceptions are true and senses are trustworthy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev