I ________ such majestic mountains before I went to Banff.a)never seenb)had never seenc)never have seend)never sawCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > I ________ such majestic mountains before I w...

I ________ such majestic mountains before I went to Banff.

a)
never seen
b)
had never seen
c)
never have seen
d)
never saw

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

I ________ such majestic mountains before I went to Banff.a)never seen...

To solve this question, we need to identify the correct verb tense that conveys the intended meaning of the sentence. Let's analyze the given options:
A:

never seen

- This option uses the present perfect tense, which is incorrect because the action of seeing the majestic mountains occurred in the past before going to Banff.
B:

had never seen

- This option uses the past perfect tense, which is the correct verb tense to express an action that occurred before another past action. It conveys the meaning that the speaker had not seen majestic mountains before going to Banff.
C:

never have seen

- This option uses the present perfect tense, which is incorrect for the same reason as option A.
D:

never saw

- This option uses the simple past tense, which does not convey the sequence of events correctly. It suggests that the action of seeing the majestic mountains happened after going to Banff.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B: had never seen.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The progress of astronomy has always been closely associated with the development and application of mechanical processes and skill. Before the seventeenth century, the size of the planets could not be measured, the satellites of the planets except the Earths moon were unknown, the phases of Mercury and Venus were merely conjectured, and accurate positions of the sun, moon, and planets among the stars, and of the stars among themselves, were impossible all because there were no telescopes. More than a half century elapsed after the invention of the telescope before Picard combined it with a graduated circle in such a way that the measurement of angles was greatly improved. Then arose the necessity for accurate time. Although Galileo had learned the principles governing the pendulum, astronomy had to wait for the mechanical genius of Huygens before a satisfactory clock was invented around 1657.Nearly all the large reflecting telescopes ever built were constructed by astronomers who possessed great facility in practical mechanics. The rapid and significant advances in nearly all departments of astronomy in the past century would not have been possible except through the skill and patience of glassmakers, opticians, and engineers. The principles of spectrum analysis as formulated by Kirchho allowed for the discovery of the elements composing every heavenly body. The deftness of Wollaston showed that light could not be analyzed unless it first passed through a very narrow slit. Even in our modern day the power of the telescope and spectroscope has been vastly extended by the optical skill and mechanical dexterity of individuals such as Rowland, Hastings and Brashear, all Americans.An observatory site should have a fairly unobstructed horizon, as much freedom from cloud as possible, good foundations for the instruments, and a very steady atmosphere. To understand the necessity of a steady atmosphere, look at some distant outdoor object through a window on a hot summer day. The object appears blurry and wavering. Similarly, currents of warm air continually rise from the earth to upper regions of the atmosphere, and colder air comes down and rushes underneath. Although these atmospheric movements are often invisible to the eye, their effect is plainly visible in the telescope as a blurry distortion. In order for an ideally-designed telescope to perform perfectly, it must be located in a perfect atmosphere. Otherwise its full power cannot be employed. All hindrances of atmosphere are most advantageously avoided in arid or desert regions of the globe, at elevations of 3000 to 10,000 feet above sea level. Higher mountains have as yet been only partially investigated, and it is not known whether difficulties of occupying them permanently would more than counterbalance the gain which greater elevation would afford.It can be inferred from the passage that

View answer

She _________ the ocean before she moved to Vancouver.

View answer

The following emails come from the Public Relations division of a largenon-profit organization.Hello Gloria!We have to choose a caterer for the upcoming gala. Two underconsideration are DoxySource and BrightRight. Although DoxySource hasdelivered satisfactory service in the past, our First Annual Sponsors Galapromises to be the largest event we have ever hosted, and BrightRight isknown for large event planning and production. However, I’d like moreinformation before switching from a tried and true contractor. Also, I’d liketo consider how to justify any over-budget costs from using BrightRight, ifthat comes up. I am committed to using only one provider. Please work up acomparison of costs of services and rentals for BrightRight andDoxySource. We require: tables, audio, food, and a punch fountain orfountains (a dessert fountain would be a lovely addition). Our budget is$6,000.00, and we plan for a maximum of 400 people.Thanks!Evelyn SchottGala CoordinatorHello Evelyn,I’ve broken out the data in the following chart:BrightRight offers packages that are generally more elegant andcomprehensive, and more expensive. For instance, we can choose a singlefull meal set, such as “The Greek Feast,” for the entire gala. Using DoxySource, while more economical and flexible in the catering, does meanmore hands-on involvement on our end.The biggest price difference comes in the audio systems. BrightRight,which consistently hosts events with attendance of several hundreds, offerscomplex systems that include lights and sound effects, in addition to highdefinitionaudio reproduction. DoxySource offers two standard, large publicaddress systems. I am not sure whether the Gala will need all the flash andsizzle of the high-end sound system; but the projected attendance is abovethe recommended usage for DoxySource’s P.A. systems. Due to electricalconcerns, we can only have one P.A. system at the gala.Gloria WelchAdministrative Assistant, Public RelationsQ.Based on the information in the communications above, and assuming themaximum number of guests, which of the following must be true?If the large punch fountain from BrightRight is sufficientfor 400 guests, then using smaller fountains from DoxySource to servethe same number of guests would cost at least 20% less per gallon.

View answer

The following emails come from the Public Relations division of a largenon-profit organization.Hello Gloria!We have to choose a caterer for the upcoming gala. Two underconsideration are DoxySource and BrightRight. Although DoxySource hasdelivered satisfactory service in the past, our First Annual Sponsors Galapromises to be the largest event we have ever hosted, and BrightRight isknown for large event planning and production. However, I’d like moreinformation before switching from a tried and true contractor. Also, I’d liketo consider how to justify any over-budget costs from using BrightRight, ifthat comes up. I am committed to using only one provider. Please work up acomparison of costs of services and rentals for BrightRight andDoxySource. We require: tables, audio, food, and a punch fountain orfountains (a dessert fountain would be a lovely addition). Our budget is$6,000.00, and we plan for a maximum of 400 people.Thanks!Evelyn SchottGala CoordinatorHello Evelyn,I’ve broken out the data in the following chart:BrightRight offers packages that are generally more elegant andcomprehensive, and more expensive. For instance, we can choose a singlefull meal set, such as “The Greek Feast,” for the entire gala. Using DoxySource, while more economical and flexible in the catering, does meanmore hands-on involvement on our end.The biggest price difference comes in the audio systems. BrightRight,which consistently hosts events with attendance of several hundreds, offerscomplex systems that include lights and sound effects, in addition to highdefinitionaudio reproduction. DoxySource offers two standard, large publicaddress systems. I am not sure whether the Gala will need all the flash andsizzle of the high-end sound system; but the projected attendance is abovethe recommended usage for DoxySource’s P.A. systems. Due to electricalconcerns, we can only have one P.A. system at the gala.Gloria WelchAdministrative Assistant, Public RelationsQ.Based on the information in the communications above, and assuming themaximum number of guests, which of the following must be true?If the coordinator uses DoxySource, she can add thechocolate fountain without a budget increase assuming chocolatefountains supplies cost $0.50 per guest.

View answer

The following emails come from the Public Relations division of a largenon-profit organization.Hello Gloria!We have to choose a caterer for the upcoming gala. Two underconsideration are DoxySource and BrightRight. Although DoxySource hasdelivered satisfactory service in the past, our First Annual Sponsors Galapromises to be the largest event we have ever hosted, and BrightRight isknown for large event planning and production. However, I’d like moreinformation before switching from a tried and true contractor. Also, I’d liketo consider how to justify any over-budget costs from using BrightRight, ifthat comes up. I am committed to using only one provider. Please work up acomparison of costs of services and rentals for BrightRight andDoxySource. We require: tables, audio, food, and a punch fountain orfountains (a dessert fountain would be a lovely addition). Our budget is$6,000.00, and we plan for a maximum of 400 people.Thanks!Evelyn SchottGala CoordinatorHello Evelyn,I’ve broken out the data in the following chart:BrightRight offers packages that are generally more elegant andcomprehensive, and more expensive. For instance, we can choose a singlefull meal set, such as “The Greek Feast,” for the entire gala. Using DoxySource, while more economical and flexible in the catering, does meanmore hands-on involvement on our end.The biggest price difference comes in the audio systems. BrightRight,which consistently hosts events with attendance of several hundreds, offerscomplex systems that include lights and sound effects, in addition to highdefinitionaudio reproduction. DoxySource offers two standard, large publicaddress systems. I am not sure whether the Gala will need all the flash andsizzle of the high-end sound system; but the projected attendance is abovethe recommended usage for DoxySource’s P.A. systems. Due to electricalconcerns, we can only have one P.A. system at the gala.Gloria WelchAdministrative Assistant, Public RelationsQ.Which of the following statements can be most reasonably inferred fromthe messages between the Gala Coordinator and the AdministrativeAssistant?Fountains are an optional element of the gala.

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT