Marcia ______ by the time we got there.a)leftb)leavesc)have leftd)had leftCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Marcia ______ by the time we got there.a)left...

Marcia ______ by the time we got there.

a)
left
b)
leaves
c)
have left
d)
had left

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Marcia ______ by the time we got there.a)leftb)leavesc)have leftd)had ...

To determine the correct verb form to fill in the blank, we need to consider the context and the tense used in the sentence.
Given that the sentence is in the past tense, we need to use the past perfect tense to indicate an action that happened before another past action.
The correct answer is had left because it correctly uses the past perfect tense.
Explanation:
- The sentence is in the past tense, indicated by the phrase "by the time we got there."
- The action of Marcia leaving occurred before the time we arrived.
- The past perfect tense, "had left," is used to indicate an action that happened before another past action.
- The other options, "left," "leaves," and "have left," do not correctly convey the sequence of events in the past.
To summarize:
- The correct verb form to fill in the blank is had left.
- This is because the sentence is in the past tense, and the past perfect tense is used to indicate an action that happened before another past action.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.The Law of Nations is founded, I have said, on the general principles of right and justice, on the broad fundamental distinctions between right and wrong, or as Montesquieu defines it, “on the principle that nations ought in time of peace to do each as much good, and in time of war as little harm as possible.” These are the principles from which any rule must be shown to spring, before it can be said to be a rule for international guidance. But what are the principles of right and wrong? These are not left to the individual reason of the interpreter of the law for the time being, but are to be decided by the public opinion of the civilized world, as it stands at the time when the case arises.It may immediately be asked—How is that public opinion to be ascertained? The answer is—By ascertaining the differences in opinion between the present and the past. For this purpose it must be observed, that the views of a past age are easily ascertainable, in matters of law, from theoretical writings, history, and judicial decisions; and these views may be reduced to definition. Modern universal intelligence will either agree or disagree in these views. In the mass of instances it will agree, as progress on such points is at all times slow; and not only will the points of disagreement be few, but they will be salient, striking, and generally of popular notoriety. Present, universal, or international opinion, has therefore two portions. 1. That in which it accords with the views of a past generation, which has become historical. 2. That in which it differs from or contradicts those views.Q.According to the passage, why is modern universal intelligence most likely to agree with the pastviews in majority of the cases?

View answer

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.The Law of Nations is founded, I have said, on the general principles of right and justice, on the broad fundamental distinctions between right and wrong, or as Montesquieu defines it, “on the principle that nations ought in time of peace to do each as much good, and in time of war as little harm as possible.” These are the principles from which any rule must be shown to spring, before it can be said to be a rule for international guidance. But what are the principles of right and wrong? These are not left to the individual reason of the interpreter of the law for the time being, but are to be decided by the public opinion of the civilized world, as it stands at the time when the case arises.It may immediately be asked—How is that public opinion to be ascertained? The answer is—By ascertaining the differences in opinion between the present and the past. For this purpose it must be observed, that the views of a past age are easily ascertainable, in matters of law, from theoretical writings, history, and judicial decisions; and these views may be reduced to definition. Modern universal intelligence will either agree or disagree in these views. In the mass of instances it will agree, as progress on such points is at all times slow; and not only will the points of disagreement be few, but they will be salient, striking, and generally of popular notoriety. Present, universal, or international opinion, has therefore two portions. 1. That in which it accords with the views of a past generation, which has become historical. 2. That in which it differs from or contradicts those views.Q.Based on the information in the passage, in which of the following situations would it become difficult to ascertain public opinion?

View answer

What would be the best option to complete the passage?It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So ________.

View answer

By the time Maria finished her report, she _______ working on the computer for over three hours.

View answer

Archeologists have discovered three sites showing conclusive evidence for the mastery of fire in Tanzania, from a period slightly after the time that Homo habilis was present in Africa. These sites clearly were founded by Homo erectus, the descendent species of Homo habilis that migrated north, out of Africa and into Asia. Homo erectus was known to have mastered fire, from ample evidence at sites in Asia. There is no reason to attribute mastery of fire to Homo ergaster, the descendent species of Homo habilis that remained in Africa.Q. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT