GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  ---- how many particles an atom has, the numb... Start Learning for Free
 ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.
  • a)
    In contrast
  • b)
    No matter
  • c)
    However
  • d)
    Although
  • e)
    On grounds that
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually n...
Explanation:
The question states that in order for the number of particles in an atom to be the same, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons. We need to choose the option that best connects this information.
Option A: In contrast
- This option suggests a contrast between two ideas, but there is no contrasting idea presented in the question. Therefore, option A is not the correct answer.
Option B: No matter
- This option suggests that it doesn't matter what the number of particles in an atom is. However, the question clearly states that the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons. Therefore, option B is not the correct answer.
Option C: However
- This option suggests a contrast or contradiction between two ideas. In this case, there is no contrasting idea presented in the question. Therefore, option C is not the correct answer.
Option D: Although
- This option suggests a contrast or contradiction between two ideas. In this case, the idea that the number of electrons needs to be the same as the number of protons is presented as a contrast to the idea of the number of particles in an atom. Therefore, option D is a possible correct answer.
Option E: On grounds that
- This option suggests that the number of electrons needs to be the same as the number of protons based on certain grounds or reasons. However, the question does not provide any specific grounds or reasons for this relationship. Therefore, option E is not the correct answer.
Based on the analysis above, the correct answer is Option B: No matter.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

On May 5th, 1997, the European edition of Business Tech Magazine led with Hoffman’s cover story "Internet Communities: How Theyre Shaping Electronic Commerce". This cover story highlights the extent to which the term virtual community has become almost synonymous with various forms of group-CMC (computer-mediated communication), including email-list forums, chat-systems such as IRC, web-based discussion areas and UseNet news-groups. There was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article as to whether the group-CMC discussions are really communities, rather how the community, as opposed to content, can be used to encourage people to return to a particular part of cyberspace for commercial gain. In a similar vein, Simpson and Armstrong in "Internet Gain" argue that ignoring virtual communities would be a great loss of a marketing tool for businesses. They define virtual communities as computer-mediated space where there is an integration of content and communication with an emphasis on member-generated content. Not all virtual community commentators agree with the Spartan position taken by Hoffman. Rheingold, one of the prime popularizers of the term virtual community, provides us with a more emotive definition in his book The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. According to Rheingold, "virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace". Rheingolds definition is extremely popular and has been quoted in many discussions about virtual communities. As discussed below, for social scientists, particularly sociologists, Rheingolds definition raises many issues, especially concerning the notion of community. This is because Rheingold argues via a variety of analogies from the real world such as homesteading that virtual communities are indeed new forms of "community". In fact, Rheingold implies that virtual communities are actually "a kind of ultimate flowering of a community". Moreover, Rheingold maintains that whenever computer-mediated communications technology becomes available; people inevitably create communities with it. Rheingold can thus be labeled as a technological determinist as he holds that there is a predictable relationship between technology and peoples behavior. The debate over the validity of Rheingolds position has raised doubts about the existence of virtual communities and the appropriate use of the term. Weinreich claims that the idea of virtual communities must be wrong because the community is a collective of kinship networks that share a common geographic region, a common history, and a shared value system, usually rooted in a common religion. In other words, Weinreich rejects the existence of virtual communities because group-CMC discussions cannot possibly meet his definition. In Weinreichs view, anyone with even a basic knowledge of sociology understands that information exchange in no way constitutes a community.Q.Weinreich rejects Rheingold’s inclusion of virtual communities in the definition of communities for all of the following reasons EXCEPT

Article 1From a local Southern California newspaper.Typically, fewer people vote in local elections that in national ones, but participation can vary widely by state. A new poll has found that more people in California vote in local elections than do people in Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico combined. This has been attributed to the high number of independent voters in our state, as well as the high enthusiasm for local elections. City councilman Brad Zellman was pleased to see such a high turnout at the recent city council election. “It’s a unique opportunity for local citizens’ votes to carry more weight than they would in big national elections, and it’s great to have so much participation in these smaller campaigns state-wide.”Article 2Editorial from the Opinion section of a competing newspaper.The recent city council election has seen many a politico claim that the increased voter turnout is due to local citizens wanting to be a part of an election where their vote is proportionally more important. However, it is incorrect to suggest that voting in local elections somehow means your vote “counts more.” True, local politicians make decisions that affect day-to-day operations of our cities, but national politicians make decisions that ultimately affect the outcomes of our lives. When you vote for national figures in larger elections, your vote matters more because you are voting for people who will ultimately have a bigger impact on your life long-term.Article 3Results from recent California elections.City councilman elections: 13,000 local votes cast (22% of the eligible population vote d), 80% of citizens who voted were polled as “extremely satisfied” with the results. District representative elections: 1.9 million votes cast (19% of the eligible population voted), 67% of citizens who voted were polled as “extremely satisfied” with the results.Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the articles support the inference as stated?Californians are more concerned with politics than are people in Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico.The “weight” Zellman describes refers to the scale of political decision-making.

Article 1News article in an environmental publication.July 19 – If current trends continue, fossil fuels will be exhausted by 2052. Industry and transportation and the inability of governments to put stricter emissions regulations in place means that there will be a greater demand for alternative energy sources. Additionally, recent concerns about the high-cost of implementing new systems such as public transportation in industrialized areas has led many voters to actually strike down propositions to subsidize alternative fuel research.Article 2Interview with a well-known scientist.August 3 – Dr. Lisa Goodman, one of the team of architects behind several new battery-operated commercial vehicles, has criticized the government’s unwillingness to aggressively lobby voters to pass measures to reduce fossil fuel usage. She suggests that without a significant reduction in per-person fossil fuel consumption, the rate of global warming could soon increase threefold.“I know that voters continue to reject costly measures to reduce widespread fossil fuel consumption such as large-scale public transportation projects, and that politicians are naturally going to avoid stumping for unpopular policies. However, if something isn’t done soon, by 2055, a barrel of gasoline may become a luxury that only the rich can afford.”Article 3Article from a weekly news magazine.August 29 – The price of crude oil has jumped by 500% over the last decade as a decrease in supply has met with an increased demand. This demand has encouraged many new oil wells to launch in the Gulf of Mexico, and some American environmental groups have expressed concern that certain oil companies are not following the safest procedures, emphasizing that the companies are more concerned with the speed of extraction than the well-being of the ecosystem. Some scientists in the Gulf have called for an increase in safety regulations for oil companies drilling off the coast, but the companies warn that this may dramatically increase the cost of crude oil, at a time when many Americans are already struggling to pay the increased price.Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the three articles support the inference as stated?Q.Politicians usually do not agree with one another on issues of global warming and fossil fuel consumption.

Directions: Each multi-source reasoning question is based on a series of information contained in text, charts, or tables. For each practice you should examine the relevant information and select the best answer of the choices given.Article - 1News article in an environmental publication.July 19 – If current trends continue, fossil fuels will be exhausted by 2052. Industry and transportation and the inability of governments to put stricter emissions regulations in place means that there will be a greater demand for alternative energy sources. Additionally, recent concerns about the high-cost of implementing new systems such as public transportation in industrialized areas has led many voters to actually strike down propositions to subsidize alternative fuel research.Article - 2Interview with a well-known scientist.August 3 – Dr. Lisa Goodman, one of the team of architects behind several new battery-operated commercial vehicles, has criticized the government’s unwillingness to aggressively lobby voters to pass measures to reduce fossil fuel usage. She suggests that without a significant reduction in per-person fossil fuel consumption, the rate of global warming could soon increase threefold.“I know that voters continue to reject costly measures to reduce widespread fossil fuel consumption such as large-scale public transportation projects, and that politicians are naturally going to avoid stumping for unpopular policies. However, if something isn’t done soon, by 2055, a barrel of gasoline may become a luxury that only the rich can afford.”Article - 3Article from a weekly news magazine.August 29 – The price of crude oil has jumped by 500% over the last decade as a decrease in supply has met with an increased demand. This demand has encouraged many new oil wells to launch in the Gulf of Mexico, and some American environmental groups have expressed concern that certain oil companies are not following the safest procedures, emphasizing that the companies are more concerned with the speed of extraction than the well-being of the ecosystem. Some scientists in the Gulf have called for an increase in safety regulations for oil companies drilling off the coast, but the companies warn that this may dramatically increase the cost of crude oil, at a time when many Americans are already struggling to pay the increased price.Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the three articles support the inference as stated?Q.Politicians usually do not agree with one another on issues of global warming and fossil fuel consumption.

The government of Storinia has proposed to conduct several particle physics experiments in Antarctica, as described below.The ultra-high-energy cosmic ray detector (UHECR-D) will track a variety of subatomic particles traveling from outer space with exceptionally high kinetic energy by recording secondary showers of particles created by these UHECRs as they collide with the upper atmosphere.The polyethylene naphthalate neutrino observatory (PEN-NO) will search for neutrinos, extremely light and fast subatomic particles that interact only weakly with normal matter.To prevent spurious results from cosmic rays, PEN-NO will be buried deep below the ice.The magnetic monopole detector (MaMoD) will attempt to verify the existence of magnetic monopoles, hypothetical subatomic particles postulated by some physical theories to be left over from the creation of the universe.The purpose of UHECR-D is to ascertain the identity, composition, and extraterrestrial origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, which are much less prevalent and well-understood than lower-energy cosmic rays. PEN-NO will measure the mass and speed of neutrinos produced in particle accelerators and nuclear reactors, both to reduce uncertainty in the known mass of a neutrino and to contribute to the resolution of a recent challenge to Einsteins theory of relativity posed by the observation of neutrinos supposedly traveling slightly faster than light. PEN-NO will also measure the passage of solar and other neutrinos of astronomical origin. Finally, if MaMoD is successful in its search, it will provide experimental proof for Diracs explanation of charge quantization and fix an asymmetry in Maxwells equations of electromagnetism.The government of Storinia projects that it will cost $42 million in total and take 2 years to construct UHECR-D, PEN-NO, and MaMoD. The government also projects that once construction is finished, the annual operating budget for each experiment will be $3.6 million for UHECR-D, $4.3 million for PEN-NO, and $2.7 million for MaMoD. All these figures are in real 2012 dollars (removing the effect of predicted inflation).Q. For each of the following particle types, select Can Conclude if you can conclude from the informationprovided that the particles in question have a minimal effect on ordinary matter. Otherwise,select Cannot Conclude.1.Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray2.Neutrinos produced in particle accelerators3.Magnetic monopole

Top Courses for GMAT

---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice ---- how many particles an atom has, the number of electrons usually needs to be the same as the number of protons.a)In contrastb)No matterc)Howeverd)Althoughe)On grounds thatCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev