President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public s...

President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.

a)
now that
b)
though
c)
due to
d)
nevertheless
e)
for fear that

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American invo...

Explanation:
To explain why President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support in American involvement in the war in Vietnam, the correct answer is option C: due to. Let's break down the reasons:
1. Public opinion: The public's opinion turned against the war in Vietnam due to various factors such as the high number of casualties, the lack of progress in achieving victory, and the growing anti-war movement.
2. Casualties: The increasing number of American casualties in Vietnam caused public outrage and led to a decline in support for the war. The war became increasingly unpopular as the death toll rose.
3. Media coverage: The media played a crucial role in shaping public opinion about the war. Journalists reported on the grim reality of the conflict, including the devastation caused by bombings and the atrocities committed by both sides. This coverage contributed to the erosion of public support for the war.
4. Protests and anti-war movement: The war in Vietnam sparked significant protests across the United States. Students, activists, and other groups organized demonstrations, marches, and rallies, demanding an end to American involvement in the conflict. These protests further influenced public opinion and reduced support for the war.
5. Policies and strategies: President Johnson's handling of the war, including his escalation of troop levels and the implementation of controversial policies such as the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, also contributed to the loss of public support. Many Americans questioned the effectiveness and justification of these actions.
In summary, President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support due to a combination of factors, including casualties, media coverage, protests, and the perceived ineffectiveness of his policies. These factors ultimately led to a decline in public support for American involvement in the war in Vietnam.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.Q.The passage suggests which of the following about African American slaves in the late 1700s?

View answer

When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.Q.Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

View answer

When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.Q.The passage suggests which of the following about African American families in colonial New York and New Jersey?

View answer

In a recent study, Mario García argues that in the United States between 1930 and 1960 the group of political activists he calls the “Mexican American Generation” was more radical and politically diverse (5) than earlier historians have recognized. Through analysis of the work of some of the era’s most important scholars, García does provide persuasive evidence that in the 1930s and 1940s these activists anticipated many of the reforms proposed by the more (10) militant Chicanos of the 1960s and 1970s. His study, however, suffers from two flaws.First, García’s analysis of the evidence he provides to demonstrate the Mexican American Generation’s political diversity is not entirely (15) consistent. Indeed, he undermines his primary thesis by emphasizing an underlying consensus among various groups that tends to conceal the full significance of their differences. Groups such as the League of United Latin American Citizens, an (20) organization that encouraged Mexican Americans to pursue a civil rights strategy of assimilation into the United States political and cultural mainstream, were often diametrically opposed to organizations such as the Congress of Spanish-Speaking People, a coalition (25) group that advocated bilingual education and equal rights for resident aliens in the United States. García acknowledges these differences but dismisses them as insignificant, given that the goals of groups as disparate as these centered on liberal reform, not (30) revolution. But one need only note the fierce controversies that occurred during the period over United States immigration policies and the question of assimilation versus cultural maintenance to recognize that Mexican American political history since 1930 (35) has been characterized not by consensus but by intense and lively debate.Second, García may be exaggerating the degree to which the views of these activists were representative of the ethnic Mexican population residing in the (40) United States during this period. Noting that by 1930 the proportion of the Mexican American population that had been born in the United States had significantly increased, García argues that between 1930 and 1960 a new generation of Mexican American (45) leaders appeared, one that was more acculturated and hence more politically active than its predecessor. Influenced by their experience of discrimination and by the inclusive rhetoric of World War II slogans, these leaders, according to García, were determined to (50) achieve full civil rights for all United States residents of Mexican descent. However, it is not clear how far this outlook extended beyond these activists. Without a better understanding of the political implications of important variables such as patterns of bilingualism (55) and rates of Mexican immigration and naturalization, and the variations in ethnic consciousness these variables help to create, one cannot assume that an increase in the proportion of Mexican Americans born in the United States necessarily resulted in an increase (60) in the ethnic Mexican population’s political activism.The passage suggests that García assumes which one of the following to have been true of Mexican Americans between 1930 and 1960?

View answer

When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a difference between free African Americans in colonial New York and New Jersey and free African Americans in the colonial South?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice President Lyndon Baines Johnson lost public support ---- American involvement in the war in Vietnam.a)now thatb)thoughc)due tod)neverthelesse)for fear thatCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam